Deprecate the tekton-provenance predicate format#292
Conversation
tekton-robot
added
the
size/L
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
priyawadhwa
force-pushed
the
deprecate
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5259c64 to
e1655f2
Compare
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
priyawadhwa
force-pushed
the
deprecate
branch
from
e1655f2 to
9f2a48d
Compare
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
|
/lgtm |
|
Hey @lukehinds thanks for the lgtm! I think prow also needs an |
For now, this will still work but we just print the error message. It can be removed in a future release, and I removed all docs around it as well.
priyawadhwa
force-pushed
the
deprecate
branch
from
9f2a48d to
a3eebe6
Compare
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dlorenc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
tekton-robot
added
the
approved
|
/lgtm |
5 participants
Added in a doc to describe how we plan to deprecate features. We can make an announcement for deprecation and then actually remove the feature two releases later.
For now, this will still work but we just print the error message.
It can be removed in a future release, and I removed all docs around it as well.
#293
ref #249