Merged
Conversation
- Handle multiple WWW-Authenticate headers (per RFC 9110) - Client-side expiry check before paying (UX guardrail) - Refactor MCP decorator to use shared verify_or_challenge - Pass through actual verification error messages
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Ports valuable non-breaking improvements from the closed PR #7.
Changes
Multiple WWW-Authenticate header handling (RFC 9110)
WWW-Authenticateheaders with different auth schemesClient-side expiry check
expiresand it's already passed, skip payment attemptMCP decorator refactor
@requires_paymentdecoratorverify_or_challenge()functionTesting
test_skips_expired_challenge- verifies client doesn't pay expired challengestest_handles_multiple_www_authenticate_headers- verifies multi-header parsing