Skip to content

Incomplete assumption in Section 5 Epilogue? #499

@daikonradish

Description

@daikonradish

theorem Real.ratPow_of_equivR (x:Real) (q:ℚ) : equivR (x^q) = (equivR x)^(q:ℝ) := by

Hi, I think the assumption list here is incomplete. I've been looking at this for some time and I feel that another assumption is required in order to rewrite the lemmas from this section: (hx : x > 0). Otherwise, it's not possible to rewrite using Section 5.6's Real.ratPow_def.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions