Skip to content

Revert "cleaned up exists_gt_of_lt_csSup and exists_le_of_lt_csInf"#476

Merged
teorth merged 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-474-KEV_testing2
Apr 4, 2026
Merged

Revert "cleaned up exists_gt_of_lt_csSup and exists_le_of_lt_csInf"#476
teorth merged 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-474-KEV_testing2

Conversation

@teorth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@teorth teorth commented Apr 3, 2026

Reverts #474

@teorth teorth merged commit b1c0107 into main Apr 4, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
@teorth teorth deleted the revert-474-KEV_testing2 branch April 4, 2026 01:54
shntnu added a commit to shntnu/analysis that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
…le guide

Document contributor guidelines that are currently only discoverable
through issue discussions and PR feedback:

- Build instructions (lake exe cache get && lake build)
- Sorry policy with the critical caveat that exercise assignments are
  not always visible in Lean docstrings — a theorem may be assigned as
  an exercise elsewhere in the textbook (e.g., Theorem 6.1.19 is
  Exercise 6.1.8, but the Lean source only says "Theorem 6.1.19(a)")
- Link to teorth#208 where the sorry policy was discussed
- Style conventions (faithfulness over golfing, with teorth#476 as precedent
  for reverts of proof cleanups)
- AI-assisted contribution requirements

The sorry policy caveat comes from direct experience: PR teorth#477 was
closed because Theorem 6.1.19 appeared non-exercise in the Lean source
but is assigned as Exercise 6.1.8 in the textbook.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
shntnu added a commit to shntnu/analysis that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
…le guide

Document contributor guidelines that are currently only discoverable
through issue discussions and PR feedback:

- Build instructions (lake exe cache get && lake build)
- Sorry policy with the critical caveat that exercise assignments are
  not always visible in Lean docstrings — a theorem may be assigned as
  an exercise elsewhere in the textbook (e.g., Theorem 6.1.19 is
  Exercise 6.1.8, but the Lean source only says "Theorem 6.1.19(a)")
- Link to teorth#208 where the sorry policy was discussed
- Style conventions (faithfulness over golfing, with teorth#476 as precedent
  for reverts of proof cleanups)
- AI-assisted contribution requirements

The sorry policy caveat comes from direct experience: PR teorth#477 was
closed because Theorem 6.1.19 appeared non-exercise in the Lean source
but is assigned as Exercise 6.1.8 in the textbook.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
shntnu added a commit to shntnu/analysis that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
…le guide

Document contributor guidelines that are currently only discoverable
through issue discussions and PR feedback:

- Build instructions (lake exe cache get && lake build)
- Sorry policy with the critical caveat that exercise assignments are
  not always visible in Lean docstrings — a theorem may be assigned as
  an exercise elsewhere in the textbook (e.g., Theorem 6.1.19 is
  Exercise 6.1.8, but the Lean source only says "Theorem 6.1.19(a)")
- Link to teorth#208 where the sorry policy was discussed
- Style conventions (faithfulness over golfing, with teorth#476 as precedent
  for reverts of proof cleanups)
- AI-assisted contribution requirements

The sorry policy caveat comes from direct experience: PR teorth#477 was
closed because Theorem 6.1.19 appeared non-exercise in the Lean source
but is assigned as Exercise 6.1.8 in the textbook.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant