The W3C validator complains about /> endings of self-closing (void) tags when using an HTML5 doctype.
I tracked down where these occur in the plugin code and made a small commit in a branch of my own fork that switches these to plain >-tag endings when the doctype setting is set to HTML5. In combination with a similar commit in the textpattern code it appears to appease the W3C validator.
Is this worth submitting as a PR?
The W3C validator complains about
/>endings of self-closing (void) tags when using an HTML5 doctype.I tracked down where these occur in the plugin code and made a small commit in a branch of my own fork that switches these to plain
>-tag endings when the doctype setting is set to HTML5. In combination with a similar commit in the textpattern code it appears to appease the W3C validator.Is this worth submitting as a PR?