ASoC: SOF: fixup the name of the new structs for IPC generic functionality by prefixing them with sof_#3415
Merged
ranj063 merged 26 commits intothesofproject:topic/sof-devfrom Feb 10, 2022
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
@plbossart, true, I'm not going attempt it today, but that is not going to be easier either. I'll sleep on it over the weekend. I'm tempted to do a name-by-name change and put a postit to the monitor to not forget this ;) |
Collaborator
Author
|
@plbossart, @ranj063, any preference on how this should be done?
|
Collaborator
I prefer this PR |
ranj063
previously approved these changes
Feb 9, 2022
Member
|
conflicts @ujfalusi ? |
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
…arrays Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
…ipelines Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
…-control Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Add sof_ prefix for the ops struct names. Note: breaks compilation and it will conflict when moved!!! Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
f70e1a2 to
482e28f
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
Changes since v1:
|
ranj063
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2022
plbossart
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
It slipped through the review that we have missed to prefix the ops structs with a proper
sof_prefix.We should have it right for upstream and we need a reminder which patches needs to be corrected.
Probably this is not the best way, but I went through all the patches and checked where the ops struct is used and added a fixup
specific to that patch. In Between the patches we will have non compiling code, which I don't like much, but when preparing for upstream and moving the fixes in position we will see how they broke and we are going to be forced to fix them up.
The other option would be to do separate patches for each struct, but it can not be a fixup anymore and the change needs to be done by hand when preparing things for sending out.
But, it will compile all the way.
I can swap to that if it is preferred..