Skip to content

Conversation

@adityamittal3107
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@adityamittal3107 adityamittal3107 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 12, 2026 10:38
@mnk-blr
Copy link
Collaborator

mnk-blr commented Jan 12, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @adityamittal3107, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an issue in the answerService by refining the getSQLQuery GraphQL mutation. The change specifically removes an unnecessary field from the query's selection, ensuring the mutation correctly fetches only the required data. This improves the robustness and correctness of the GraphQL API calls related to SQL query retrieval.

Highlights

  • GraphQL Query Correction: Removed an extraneous ${bachSessionId} field from the Answer__getQuery selection set within the getSQLQuery GraphQL mutation.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes the getSQLQuery GraphQL mutation by removing the bachSessionId field from the requested response fields. This is presumably because the Answer__getQuery endpoint does not return a session ID, and requesting it was causing an error. The change itself seems correct under this assumption. However, I've pointed out that the corresponding unit test was not updated to reflect this change in the response payload, which could lead to misleading test results. I've recommended updating the test mock to align with the new query structure.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/thoughtspot/visual-embed-sdk/@thoughtspot/visual-embed-sdk@408

commit: 3dcca89

@sonar-prod-ts
Copy link

sonar-prod-ts bot commented Jan 13, 2026

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@adityamittal3107 adityamittal3107 merged commit b1237f5 into main Jan 13, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants