Accuracy in README seems inaccurate.

[your-diary]

According to the README.md,

Accuracy

Cracker is not absolutely accurate. It is able to perform close to 100% accurate on first 624 32-bit generations, ~99.5% on the first 1 000, ~95% on the first 10 000 and then figures drop to ~50% accurate to generation 50 000.

but I think this is the value of total (or accumulated) accuracy.

When I plot the accuracy of recent 100 predictions, the plot drops much faster than the total accuracy. And IMHO this is a more appropriate measure when discussing prediction accuracy.

Though I do not think what is written in README.md is wrong, I think it is a bit confusive.

[tna0y]

The issue has been fixed in the latest update thanks to @mcfx