Conversation
PM-3688 Fix onboarding bio-title payload
…ersonalization format for social links - https://topcoder.atlassian.net/browse/PM-2073
PM-3532 Update redux on open to work step
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| gap: $sp-3; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .selectWrapper { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[design]
The use of min-width: 360px; for .selectWrapper might cause layout issues on smaller screens. Consider using a responsive approach to ensure better adaptability across different screen sizes.
| .loadingSpinnerContainer { | ||
| position: relative; | ||
| height: 100px; | ||
| margin-top: -30px; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
The negative margin margin-top: -30px; in .loadingSpinnerContainer can lead to unexpected layout shifts, especially if the surrounding elements change. Consider using a different layout strategy to avoid relying on negative margins.
kkartunov
changed the title
|
|
||
| do { | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop | ||
| const response = await getChallengeResources(challengeId, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[performance]
Using no-await-in-loop can lead to performance issues as it waits for each iteration to complete before proceeding. Consider refactoring to use Promise.all for concurrent execution.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const statusAfterUpdate = payload.status || challengeInfo.status | ||
| if (winnerPayload.length > 0 && statusAfterUpdate !== 'COMPLETED') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The logic here assumes that the challenge status must be 'COMPLETED' if there are winners. This assumption should be validated with business requirements to ensure correctness.
| <a | ||
| href={`${EnvironmentConfig.API.V6}/challenges/${challenge.id}`} | ||
| <Link | ||
| to={`${challenge.id}`} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The to prop in the Link component should be a valid path string. Ensure that ${challenge.id} resolves to a valid route. Consider using a more descriptive route path if applicable.
| abbreviation: string | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export type ChallengeWinner = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
Consider using string for userId in ChallengeWinner to maintain consistency with other ID fields like id and typeId in the Challenge interface, which are strings. This could help avoid potential type mismatches when interacting with other parts of the system.
| export type ChallengePrize = { | ||
| description?: string | ||
| type: string | ||
| value: number |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Ensure that the value field in ChallengePrize is validated to prevent negative values, which may not make sense in the context of a prize.
| type UpdateChallengePayload = { | ||
| status?: Challenge['status'] | ||
| winners?: Array< | ||
| Pick<ChallengeWinner, 'handle' | 'placement' | 'userId'> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Consider validating the winners array to ensure that each winner has a unique placement value. This will prevent potential data inconsistencies where multiple winners could have the same placement.
| export const updateChallengeById = async ( | ||
| id: Challenge['id'], | ||
| data: UpdateChallengePayload, | ||
| ): Promise<Challenge> => xhrPatchAsync<UpdateChallengePayload, Challenge>( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
Ensure that the xhrPatchAsync function handles potential errors gracefully, such as network failures or server errors, and that these are communicated back to the caller appropriately.
| ), | ||
| personalizationInfo, | ||
| ] | ||
| const saveData: any = async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
The saveData function is typed as any. Consider specifying a more precise type to improve type safety and maintainability.
| } else { | ||
| await updateMemberPersonalizations(datas) | ||
| try { | ||
| await updateOrCreateMemberTraitsAsync(profileHandle || '', [{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ correctness]
The profileHandle is used with a fallback to an empty string. If profileHandle is undefined, this could lead to unexpected behavior when calling updateOrCreateMemberTraitsAsync. Consider validating profileHandle before use.
| @@ -1,14 +1,21 @@ | |||
| export interface OpenToWorkTrait { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
The OpenToWorkTrait interface is defined but not used within this file. Consider removing it if it's not needed, or ensure it's utilized appropriately elsewhere.
| referAs?: string | ||
| profileSelfTitle?: string | ||
| shortBio?: string | ||
| links?: Array<{ url: string; name: string }> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 design]
Consider defining a separate type or interface for the links array elements to improve reusability and clarity.
| if (!memberPersonalizationTraits) return | ||
|
|
||
| const personalizationData = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data || [] | ||
| const personalizationData = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data?.[0] || {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ correctness]
The change from find to direct access assumes that memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data always contains an object with the expected structure. This could lead to runtime errors if the data structure changes or if the data is not as expected. Consider adding validation or error handling to ensure the data structure is correct.
| setLoading(true) | ||
|
|
||
| const existingData = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data || [] | ||
| const existing = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data?.[0] || {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ correctness]
The change from existingData to existing assumes that memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data?.[0] is always an object. If this assumption is incorrect, it could lead to runtime errors. Consider adding checks or handling cases where the data might not be structured as expected.
|
|
||
| const nextPersonalizations = personalizationTrait?.traits?.data | ||
|
|
||
| if (Array.isArray(nextPersonalizations)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 maintainability]
The check Array.isArray(nextPersonalizations) is good, but consider logging or handling the case where nextPersonalizations is not an array to aid in debugging potential issues.
| setPersonalizationInfo({ | ||
| ...(personalizationInfo || {}), | ||
| setPersonalizationInfo(prev => ({ | ||
| ...(prev ?? props.reduxPersonalizations ?? {}), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Using prev ?? props.reduxPersonalizations ?? {} in setPersonalizationInfo could lead to unexpected behavior if prev is null or undefined. Consider ensuring prev is always an object to avoid potential issues with object spreading.
| availability, | ||
| preferredRoles, | ||
| }, | ||
| openToWork: openToWork |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 correctness]
The use of _.omitBy with _.isUndefined is appropriate for filtering out undefined values, but consider if there are any other falsy values that should also be omitted. If not, this is fine as is.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function isObjectLike(value: any): boolean { | ||
| return !!value && typeof value === 'object' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The isObjectLike function checks if a value is an object but does not exclude arrays, which are also objects in JavaScript. If the intention is to exclude arrays, consider using typeof value === 'object' && !Array.isArray(value).
| return !!value && typeof value === 'object' | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export function flattenPersonalizationData(personalizationData: UserTrait[] = []): UserTrait[] { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The flattenPersonalizationData function assumes that item.personalization is an array if it exists. Consider adding a type guard to ensure item.personalization is an array before iterating over it.
| .find(Boolean) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export function getPersonalizationLinks(personalizationData: UserTrait[] = []): UserTrait[] { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
In getPersonalizationLinks, the linksByKey set is used to deduplicate links by name and URL. This approach may not handle cases where URLs differ only by trailing slashes or query parameters. Consider normalizing URLs before deduplication.
|
|
||
| const memberTitleTrait: any | ||
| = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data?.find((trait: any) => trait.profileSelfTitle) | ||
| const memberTitle: string | undefined = useMemo( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The use of useMemo here is appropriate for memoizing the memberTitle, but ensure that getFirstProfileSelfTitle is a pure function. If it has side effects or depends on anything other than its arguments, it could lead to unexpected behavior.
| (trait: any) => trait.profileSelfTitle, | ||
| ) | ||
| setMemberTitle(profileSelfTitleData?.profileSelfTitle) | ||
| setMemberTitle(getFirstProfileSelfTitle(props.memberPersonalizationTraitsData)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ correctness]
The function getFirstProfileSelfTitle is used here to set the member title. Ensure that this function handles cases where memberPersonalizationTraitsData is undefined or empty to avoid potential runtime errors.
| updatedTitle, | ||
| props.memberPersonalizationTraitsData, | ||
| ) | ||
| const existing = props.memberPersonalizationTraitsData?.[0] || {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The assignment const existing = props.memberPersonalizationTraitsData?.[0] || {} assumes that the first element is the one to update. Ensure this logic aligns with the intended behavior, as it might overwrite data if memberPersonalizationTraitsData contains multiple entries.
| (trait: UserTrait) => trait.links, | ||
| ), [memberPersonalizationTraits]) | ||
| const memberLinks: UserTrait[] = useMemo( | ||
| () => getPersonalizationLinks(memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ correctness]
The getPersonalizationLinks function is now responsible for extracting links from memberPersonalizationTraits. Ensure that this function handles cases where memberPersonalizationTraits is undefined or does not contain the expected structure to avoid runtime errors.
| <div className={styles.links}> | ||
| { | ||
| memberLinks?.links.map((trait: UserTrait) => ( | ||
| memberLinks.map((trait: UserTrait) => ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The key prop for the list items is constructed using trait.name and trait.url. Ensure that both name and url are unique and consistently available to prevent potential key collisions or rendering issues.
| updatedLinks, | ||
| props.memberPersonalizationTraitsFullData ?? [], | ||
| ) | ||
| const existing = props.memberPersonalizationTraitsFullData?.[0] || {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The existing variable is assigned the first element of memberPersonalizationTraitsFullData or an empty object. Ensure that memberPersonalizationTraitsFullData is always an array or handle the case where it might be undefined or not an array to avoid potential runtime errors.
| if (!memberPersonalizationTraits) return | ||
|
|
||
| const personalizationData = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data || [] | ||
| const personalizationData = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data?.[0] || {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ correctness]
The change from find to direct access assumes that memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data always contains an object with the openToWork property at index 0. Ensure that this assumption is valid, as it could lead to runtime errors if the structure of data changes or if it is empty.
| setIsSaving(true) | ||
|
|
||
| const existingData = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data || [] | ||
| const existing = memberPersonalizationTraits?.[0]?.traits?.data?.[0] || {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
The change from using upsertTrait to manually constructing the personalizationData array removes the abstraction provided by upsertTrait. This could lead to potential errors if the logic for updating traits changes in the future. Consider whether maintaining the use of upsertTrait would improve maintainability.
| if ( | ||
| !hasOpenToWork | ||
| || !props.profile.availableForGigs | ||
| || (openToWorkItem.preferredRoles?.length === 0 && openToWorkItem.availability === undefined)) return <></> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 readability]
The condition (openToWorkItem.preferredRoles?.length === 0 && openToWorkItem.availability === undefined) could be simplified to !openToWorkItem.preferredRoles?.length && openToWorkItem.availability === undefined for better readability.
3 participants
Related JIRA Ticket:
https://topcoder.atlassian.net/browse/
What's in this PR?