Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
or
.
Download ZIP

Loading…

Update faq.txt #61

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

2 participants

@Creaprog

I remove dead links.

@Creaprog Creaprog Update faq.txt
I remove dead links.
d803394
@larbb

Linus does not accept pull requests from github. Send an e-mail to LKML.

@Creaprog

How to send an email to LKML ?

http://www.cadsoft.de/people/kls/vdr/ => Not Found. Apologies, but the page you requested could not be found.

http://www.metzlerbros.org/dvb/ => Not Found. The requested URL /dvb/ was not found on this server.

http://xinehq.de/ => The page is not displayed

http://cvs.tuxbox.org/ => projet dead, no code source :(

@vaussard vaussard referenced this pull request from a commit in vaussard/linux
Borislav Petkov x86: Improve the printout of the SMP bootup CPU table
As the new x86 CPU bootup printout format code maintainer, I am
taking immediate action to improve and clean (and thus indulge
my OCD) the reporting of the cores when coming up online.

Fix padding to a right-hand alignment, cleanup code and bind
reporting width to the max number of supported CPUs on the
system, like this:

 [    0.074509] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors:      #1  #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7 OK
 [    0.644008] smpboot: Booting Node   1, Processors:  #8  #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 OK
 [    1.245006] smpboot: Booting Node   2, Processors: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 OK
 [    1.864005] smpboot: Booting Node   3, Processors: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 OK
 [    2.489005] smpboot: Booting Node   4, Processors: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 OK
 [    3.093005] smpboot: Booting Node   5, Processors: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 OK
 [    3.698005] smpboot: Booting Node   6, Processors: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 OK
 [    4.304005] smpboot: Booting Node   7, Processors: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 OK
 [    4.961413] Brought up 64 CPUs

and this:

 [    0.072367] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors:    #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 OK
 [    0.686329] Brought up 8 CPUs

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Cc: wangyijing@huawei.com
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: guohanjun@huawei.com
Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130927143554.GF4422@pd.tnic
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
646e29a
@vaussard vaussard referenced this pull request from a commit in vaussard/linux
Borislav Petkov x86/boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
Turn it into (for example):

[    0.073380] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
[    0.074005] .... node   #0, CPUs:          #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7
[    0.603005] .... node   #1, CPUs:     #8   #9  #10  #11  #12  #13  #14  #15
[    1.200005] .... node   #2, CPUs:    #16  #17  #18  #19  #20  #21  #22  #23
[    1.796005] .... node   #3, CPUs:    #24  #25  #26  #27  #28  #29  #30  #31
[    2.393005] .... node   #4, CPUs:    #32  #33  #34  #35  #36  #37  #38  #39
[    2.996005] .... node   #5, CPUs:    #40  #41  #42  #43  #44  #45  #46  #47
[    3.600005] .... node   #6, CPUs:    #48  #49  #50  #51  #52  #53  #54  #55
[    4.202005] .... node   #7, CPUs:    #56  #57  #58  #59  #60  #61  #62  #63
[    4.811005] .... node   #8, CPUs:    #64  #65  #66  #67  #68  #69  #70  #71
[    5.421006] .... node   #9, CPUs:    #72  #73  #74  #75  #76  #77  #78  #79
[    6.032005] .... node  #10, CPUs:    #80  #81  #82  #83  #84  #85  #86  #87
[    6.648006] .... node  #11, CPUs:    #88  #89  #90  #91  #92  #93  #94  #95
[    7.262005] .... node  #12, CPUs:    #96  #97  #98  #99 #100 #101 #102 #103
[    7.865005] .... node  #13, CPUs:   #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111
[    8.466005] .... node  #14, CPUs:   #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119
[    9.073006] .... node  #15, CPUs:   #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127
[    9.679901] x86: Booted up 16 nodes, 128 CPUs

and drop useless elements.

Change num_digits() to hpa's division-avoiding, cell-phone-typed
version which he went at great lengths and pains to submit on a
Saturday evening.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com
Cc: wangyijing@huawei.com
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: guohanjun@huawei.com
Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130930095624.GB16383@pd.tnic
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
a17bce4
@zeitgeist87 zeitgeist87 referenced this pull request from a commit in zeitgeist87/linux
Andrew Morton ocfs2-do-not-return-dlm_migrate_response_mastery_ref-to-avoid-endless…
…loop-during-umount-checkpatch-fixes

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#56: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3087:
+                       if (tmp->type == DLM_MLE_MASTER) {$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#56: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3087:
+                       if (tmp->type == DLM_MLE_MASTER) {$

WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (23, 31)
#56: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3087:
+                       if (tmp->type == DLM_MLE_MASTER) {
+                               ret = DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF;

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#57: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3088:
+                               ret = DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF;$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#57: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3088:
+                               ret = DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF;$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#58: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3089:
+                               mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: master=%u, newmaster=%u, "$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#58: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3089:
+                               mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: master=%u, newmaster=%u, "$

WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#59: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3090:
+                               mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: master=%u, newmaster=%u, "
+                                               "telling master to get ref "

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#59: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3090:
+                                               "telling master to get ref "$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#59: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3090:
+                                               "telling master to get ref "$

WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#60: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3091:
+                                               "telling master to get ref "
+                                               "for cleared out mle during "

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#60: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3091:
+                                               "for cleared out mle during "$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#60: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3091:
+                                               "for cleared out mle during "$

WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#61: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3092:
+                                               "for cleared out mle during "
+                                               "migration\n", dlm->name,

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#61: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3092:
+                                               "migration\n", dlm->name,$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#61: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3092:
+                                               "migration\n", dlm->name,$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#62: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3093:
+                                               namelen, name, master,$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#62: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3093:
+                                               namelen, name, master,$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#63: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3094:
+                                               new_master);$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#63: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3094:
+                                               new_master);$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#64: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3095:
+                       }$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#64: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3095:
+                       }$

total: 9 errors, 13 warnings, 20 lines checked

NOTE: whitespace errors detected, you may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or
      scripts/cleanfile

./patches/ocfs2-do-not-return-dlm_migrate_response_mastery_ref-to-avoid-endlessloop-during-umount.patch has style problems, please review.

If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Cc: jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
b29f935
@swarren swarren referenced this pull request from a commit in swarren/linux-tegra
Andrew Morton ocfs2-do-not-return-dlm_migrate_response_mastery_ref-to-avoid-endless…
…loop-during-umount-checkpatch-fixes

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#56: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3087:
+                       if (tmp->type == DLM_MLE_MASTER) {$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#56: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3087:
+                       if (tmp->type == DLM_MLE_MASTER) {$

WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (23, 31)
#56: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3087:
+                       if (tmp->type == DLM_MLE_MASTER) {
+                               ret = DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF;

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#57: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3088:
+                               ret = DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF;$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#57: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3088:
+                               ret = DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF;$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#58: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3089:
+                               mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: master=%u, newmaster=%u, "$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#58: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3089:
+                               mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: master=%u, newmaster=%u, "$

WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#59: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3090:
+                               mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: master=%u, newmaster=%u, "
+                                               "telling master to get ref "

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#59: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3090:
+                                               "telling master to get ref "$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#59: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3090:
+                                               "telling master to get ref "$

WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#60: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3091:
+                                               "telling master to get ref "
+                                               "for cleared out mle during "

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#60: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3091:
+                                               "for cleared out mle during "$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#60: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3091:
+                                               "for cleared out mle during "$

WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#61: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3092:
+                                               "for cleared out mle during "
+                                               "migration\n", dlm->name,

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#61: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3092:
+                                               "migration\n", dlm->name,$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#61: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3092:
+                                               "migration\n", dlm->name,$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#62: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3093:
+                                               namelen, name, master,$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#62: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3093:
+                                               namelen, name, master,$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#63: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3094:
+                                               new_master);$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#63: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3094:
+                                               new_master);$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#64: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3095:
+                       }$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#64: FILE: fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:3095:
+                       }$

total: 9 errors, 13 warnings, 20 lines checked

NOTE: whitespace errors detected, you may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or
      scripts/cleanfile

./patches/ocfs2-do-not-return-dlm_migrate_response_mastery_ref-to-avoid-endlessloop-during-umount.patch has style problems, please review.

If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Cc: jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
216ace2
@swarren swarren referenced this pull request from a commit in swarren/linux-tegra
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
a585f87
@baerwolf baerwolf referenced this pull request from a commit in baerwolf/linux-stephan
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
commit a585f87 upstream.

The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
4f86b54
@tositrino tositrino referenced this pull request from a commit in tositrino/linux
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
commit a585f87 upstream.

The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
0218824
@mdrjr mdrjr referenced this pull request from a commit in hardkernel/linux
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
commit a585f87 upstream.

The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
e49dde8
@mdrjr mdrjr referenced this pull request from a commit in hardkernel/linux
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
commit a585f87 upstream.

The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
0e0dc73
@rogerq rogerq referenced this pull request from a commit in rogerq/linux
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
commit a585f87 upstream.

The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
ee651d1
@dormando dormando referenced this pull request from a commit in fastly/linux
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
commit a585f87 upstream.

The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
83fa27b
@Creaprog Creaprog closed this
@swarren swarren referenced this pull request from a commit in swarren/linux-tegra
Andrew Morton initramfs-support-initramfs-that-is-more-than-2g-checkpatch-fixes
WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#60: FILE: fs/isofs/compress.c:163:
 					       " page idx = %d, bh idx = %d,"
+					       " avail_in = %ld,"

WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#61: FILE: fs/isofs/compress.c:164:
+					       " avail_in = %ld,"
+					       " avail_out = %ld\n",

WARNING: missing space after return type
#76: FILE: include/linux/decompress/bunzip2.h:5:
+	    long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#77: FILE: include/linux/decompress/bunzip2.h:6:
+	    long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#94: FILE: include/linux/decompress/generic.h:5:
+			      long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#95: FILE: include/linux/decompress/generic.h:6:
+			      long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#122: FILE: include/linux/decompress/inflate.h:5:
+	   long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#123: FILE: include/linux/decompress/inflate.h:6:
+	   long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#140: FILE: include/linux/decompress/unlz4.h:5:
+	long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#141: FILE: include/linux/decompress/unlz4.h:6:
+	long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#158: FILE: include/linux/decompress/unlzma.h:5:
+	   long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#159: FILE: include/linux/decompress/unlzma.h:6:
+	   long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#177: FILE: include/linux/decompress/unlzo.h:5:
+	long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#178: FILE: include/linux/decompress/unlzo.h:6:
+	long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#210: FILE: include/linux/zlib.h:86:
+    uLong     avail_in;  /* number of bytes available at next_in */$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#215: FILE: include/linux/zlib.h:90:
+    uLong     avail_out; /* remaining free space at next_out */$

WARNING: __initdata should be placed after count
#259: FILE: init/initramfs.c:177:
+static __initdata unsigned long count;

WARNING: __initdata should be placed after remains
#268: FILE: init/initramfs.c:189:
+static __initdata long remains;

WARNING: missing space after return type
#385: FILE: lib/decompress_bunzip2.c:679:
+			long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#386: FILE: lib/decompress_bunzip2.c:680:
+			long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#401: FILE: lib/decompress_bunzip2.c:747:
+			long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#402: FILE: lib/decompress_bunzip2.c:748:
+			long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#427: FILE: lib/decompress_inflate.c:37:
+		       long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#428: FILE: lib/decompress_inflate.c:38:
+		       long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: Unnecessary space before function pointer arguments
#456: FILE: lib/decompress_unlz4.c:35:
+				long (*fill) (void *, unsigned long),

WARNING: Unnecessary space before function pointer arguments
#457: FILE: lib/decompress_unlz4.c:36:
+				long (*flush) (void *, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#479: FILE: lib/decompress_unlz4.c:179:
+			      long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#480: FILE: lib/decompress_unlz4.c:180:
+			      long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#529: FILE: lib/decompress_unlzma.c:283:
+	long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long);

WARNING: missing space after return type
#541: FILE: lib/decompress_unlzma.c:538:
+			      long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#542: FILE: lib/decompress_unlzma.c:539:
+			      long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#557: FILE: lib/decompress_unlzma.c:671:
+			      long(*fill)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: missing space after return type
#558: FILE: lib/decompress_unlzma.c:672:
+			      long(*flush)(void*, unsigned long),

WARNING: Unnecessary space before function pointer arguments
#586: FILE: lib/decompress_unlzo.c:112:
+				long (*fill) (void *, unsigned long),

WARNING: Unnecessary space before function pointer arguments
#587: FILE: lib/decompress_unlzo.c:113:
+				long (*flush) (void *, unsigned long),

total: 0 errors, 35 warnings, 479 lines checked

./patches/initramfs-support-initramfs-that-is-more-than-2g.patch has style problems, please review.

If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
c923ec1
@da-x da-x referenced this pull request from a commit
Commit has since been removed from the repository and is no longer available.
@pstglia pstglia referenced this pull request from a commit in pstglia/linux
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
4e736c2
@veprbl veprbl referenced this pull request from a commit in lab305itep/linux
Marek Vasut gpio: mxs: Allow for recursive enable_irq_wake() call
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320946

commit a585f87 upstream.

The scenario here is that someone calls enable_irq_wake() from somewhere
in the code. This will result in the lockdep producing a backtrace as can
be seen below. In my case, this problem is triggered when using the wl1271
(TI WlCore) driver found in drivers/net/wireless/ti/ .

The problem cause is rather obvious from the backtrace, but let's outline
the dependency. enable_irq_wake() grabs the IRQ buslock in irq_set_irq_wake(),
which in turns calls mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq() . But mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq()
calls enable_irq_wake() again on the one-level-higher IRQ , thus it tries to
grab the IRQ buslock again in irq_set_irq_wake() . Because the spinlock in
irq_set_irq_wake()->irq_get_desc_buslock()->__irq_get_desc_lock() is not
marked as recursive, lockdep will spew the stuff below.

We know we can safely re-enter the lock, so use IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK to
fix the spew.

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:1/18 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/18:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #1:  ((&fw_work->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0036308>] process_one_work+0x134/0x4a4
  #2:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-...}, at: [<c00685f0>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.33-00012-gf06b763-dirty #61
 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
 [<c0013eb4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
 [<c0011c74>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64)
 [<c005bb08>] (__lock_acquire+0x140c/0x1a64) from [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104)
 [<c005c6a8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x104) from [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
 [<c051d5a4>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88)
 [<c00685f0>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88) from [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4)
 [<c0068e78>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xf4) from [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24)
 [<c027260c>] (mxs_gpio_set_wake_irq+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44)
 [<c0068cf4>] (set_irq_wake_real+0x30/0x44) from [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4)
 [<c0068ee4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xf4) from [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c)
 [<c0310748>] (wlcore_nvs_cb+0x10c/0x97c) from [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58)
 [<c02be5e8>] (request_firmware_work_func+0x38/0x58) from [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4)
 [<c0036394>] (process_one_work+0x1c0/0x4a4) from [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394)
 [<c0036a4c>] (worker_thread+0x138/0x394) from [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0)
 [<c003cb74>] (kthread+0xa4/0xb0) from [<c000ee00>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
 wlcore: loaded

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
cf7d51d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Commits on Dec 15, 2013
  1. @Creaprog

    Update faq.txt

    Creaprog authored
    I remove dead links.
This page is out of date. Refresh to see the latest.
Showing with 0 additions and 14 deletions.
  1. +0 −14 Documentation/dvb/faq.txt
View
14 Documentation/dvb/faq.txt
@@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ Some very frequently asked questions about linuxtv-dvb
3. Which other DVB applications exist?
- http://www.cadsoft.de/people/kls/vdr/
- Klaus Schmidinger's Video Disk Recorder
-
- http://www.metzlerbros.org/dvb/
- Metzler Bros. DVB development; alternate drivers and
- DVB utilities, include dvb-mpegtools and tuxzap.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dvbtools/
Dave Chapman's dvbtools package, including
@@ -71,11 +65,6 @@ Some very frequently asked questions about linuxtv-dvb
http://www.dbox2.info/
LinuxDVB on the dBox2
- http://www.tuxbox.org/
- http://cvs.tuxbox.org/
- the TuxBox CVS many interesting DVB applications and the dBox2
- DVB source
-
http://www.linuxtv.org/downloads/
DVB Swiss Army Knife library and utilities
@@ -86,7 +75,6 @@ Some very frequently asked questions about linuxtv-dvb
mplayer
http://xine.sourceforge.net/
- http://xinehq.de/
xine
http://www.mythtv.org/
@@ -155,5 +143,3 @@ Some very frequently asked questions about linuxtv-dvb
- dvb-ttpci: The main driver for AV7110 based, full-featured
DVB-S/C/T cards
-
-eof
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.