Replies: 5 comments
|
I chose Debian <3 No company owns it. Its community runs it, and a non-profit holds its assets, so no vendor can change its direction or licensing overnight. It is also technically solid, with long-supported stable releases, an open security process, signed archives, and leading work on reproducible builds. Ubuntu came close. Canonical does strong security work, including its new weekly kernel update cycle, but one company makes those decisions. Fedora has excellent engineering, but each release lasts only about 13 months and Red Hat steers its direction. The other options were either too niche, too unstable, or too much to maintain ourselves. |
|
We have a couple of giants we can stand on the shoulders of:
|
|
I've heard good things about Nix but I am more used to debian, my understanding is that nix shell can be used within debian so that would be a nice way to have a recommended path for gradual adoption. |
|
Ubuntu and copy Mint. Improve on that. |
|
Ubuntu for its hardware support. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Like the title says and is described on the site, one of the first step is choosing a mature Linux distribution to serve as the project's foundation. Ideally a strong upstream distribution will give us a stable base, proven security practices, and access to a large ecosystem of software.
24 votes ·
All reactions