chore: add narrow CODEOWNERS for security-sensitive paths#46
Merged
Conversation
saadqbal
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a narrow
.github/CODEOWNERSfile listing a small set of security-sensitive paths with@saadqbalas a required co-reviewer.Why
Reviewer choice is and remains the author's decision for the other 95% of PRs — pick whoever has context. This file only auto-requests an additional security-aware reviewer on a small list of files where a regression would be expensive (auth code, security-critical chart templates, training-pod specs, baked credentials, etc.).
Combined with the branch-protection rule "require review from CODEOWNERS", this ensures no critical path is merged without a security-literate set of eyes, while keeping the default author-pick model intact everywhere else.
What's protected
See the CODEOWNERS file. Short list per repo — tuned to the specific surfaces this repo exposes. If you think a path is missing, or one of the listed paths is overkill, comment on this PR and we'll adjust.
Effect on day-to-day work
@saadqbalas a requested reviewer alongside whoever the author picked. Both approvals are required before merge. Author can still add any other reviewer they want.Related
client,client-runtime,tracebloc-client,backend.🤖 Generated with Claude Code