Projects and keys #119
Projects and keys #119
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughUnifies API key guidance into authentication-focused Prerequisites/Note blocks, adds two Settings docs (managing API keys; projects & environments), inserts a Settings group in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Disabled knowledge base sources:
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 LanguageToolsettings/projects-and-environments.mdx[style] ~18-~18: ‘mixed together’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_MIXED_TOGETHER) 🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 732a957 in 3 minutes and 32 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1077lines of code in13files - Skipped
5files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
16draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. api-reference/introduction.mdx:9
- Draft comment:
The new block clearly outlines API key generation steps. Ensure the phrasing remains consistent across all docs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. datasets/sdk-usage.mdx:39
- Draft comment:
Improved note clarifying the prerequisite of setting TRACELOOP_API_KEY. Consistent language helps users. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. experiments/running-from-code.mdx:41
- Draft comment:
Note block updated for clarity on API key prerequisites; this aligns with the updated SDK guides. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. mint.json:178
- Draft comment:
New navigation group 'Settings' added with pages for managing API keys and projects. Verify the ordering meets UX expectations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
5. openllmetry/getting-started-go.mdx:109
- Draft comment:
Reformatted the API key generation section using and added a tip for verifying project/environment. The structure is clear. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
6. openllmetry/getting-started-nextjs.mdx:208
- Draft comment:
Updated Next.js instructions now mirror other SDK guides with a consistent note and code block for API key setup. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
7. openllmetry/getting-started-python.mdx:86
- Draft comment:
The Python guide now has a unified note block with clear instructions on generating and setting your API key. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
8. openllmetry/getting-started-ruby.mdx:80
- Draft comment:
Ruby guide updates now match the revised API key instructions from other languages. The note is clear and consistent. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
9. openllmetry/getting-started-ts.mdx:106
- Draft comment:
TypeScript instructions have been updated with a clear note block; consistency across language guides is maintained. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
10. openllmetry/integrations/traceloop.mdx:16
- Draft comment:
Updated integration guide now includes a step-by-step block for API key generation. The instructions are precise. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
11. prompts/quick-start.mdx:14
- Draft comment:
Removed redundant API key generation instructions in the prompt quick start. This streamlines the guide for users. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
12. settings/managing-api-keys.mdx:1
- Draft comment:
The new 'Managing API Keys' documentation is comprehensive with clear steps and warnings. It’s well-structured. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
13. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:1
- Draft comment:
The 'Projects and Environments' document is detailed and organized well. It effectively explains isolation and environment settings. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
14. openllmetry/integrations/traceloop.mdx:13
- Draft comment:
Possible typographical error: The header reads "Connecting OpenLLMetry to Traceloop directly". Should this be "Connecting OpenTelemetry to Traceloop directly"? - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
15. settings/managing-api-keys.mdx:252
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'OpenLLMetry' in the 'Getting Started' card might be intended to be 'OpenTelemetry'. Please check the spelling. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Based on historical feedback, this comment is too similar to comments previously marked by users as bad.
16. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:433
- Draft comment:
Typo detected in URL: '/openllmetry/getting-started-python' should likely be '/opentelemetry/getting-started-python'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% 1. The URL path uses 'openllmetry' which seems unusual. 2. However, since this is a new file, we don't have strong evidence that this is actually a typo - it could be an intentional product name or path. 3. Without access to the actual site structure or knowing if this URL works, we can't be certain this is incorrect. 4. The product seems focused on LLM observability, so 'openllmetry' could be an intentional play on 'opentelemetry'. I might be overthinking this - if it looks like a typo, it probably is. The similarity to 'opentelemetry' is very suspicious. However, without being able to verify the correct URL structure or having strong evidence this is wrong, I shouldn't assume it's a mistake. This could be an intentional product name. Since we don't have strong evidence that this URL is incorrect and it could be an intentional product name, we should err on the side of not making assumptions and delete the comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_YVUn649pMwXHrI9o
You can customize 
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx (1)
13-34: Effective problem/solution framing. The introduction clearly articulates the value of Projects and Environments. Minor note: Line 18's "get mixed together" could be tightened to "intermingle" or "commingled" for conciseness, though the current phrasing is clear and accessible.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
img/settings/project-dark.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngimg/settings/project-light.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngimg/settings/projects-dark.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngimg/settings/projects-light.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpackage-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
api-reference/introduction.mdx(1 hunks)datasets/sdk-usage.mdx(1 hunks)experiments/running-from-code.mdx(1 hunks)mint.json(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-go.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-nextjs.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-python.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-ruby.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-ts.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/integrations/traceloop.mdx(1 hunks)prompts/quick-start.mdx(1 hunks)settings/managing-api-keys.mdx(1 hunks)settings/projects-and-environments.mdx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx
[style] ~18-~18: ‘mixed together’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...s: - Traces from different services get mixed together - Production data appears alongside dev...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_MIXED_TOGETHER)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
experiments/running-from-code.mdx (1)
41-44: Consistent prerequisites update. This aligns well with the standardized pattern across the documentation set, directing users to the centralized API key management guide.prompts/quick-start.mdx (1)
16-19: Consistent prerequisites update. Aligns with the standardized pattern throughout the documentation for API key setup guidance.settings/managing-api-keys.mdx (1)
1-262: Verify projects-and-environments.mdx exists and is properly linked. The new managing-api-keys guide is comprehensive and well-structured. However, it references/settings/projects-and-environmentsat lines 23 and 242, but this file was not provided in the files for review. Ensure this file exists and is properly created as part of this PR, as it's also referenced in mint.json and appears to be a companion guide.datasets/sdk-usage.mdx (1)
39-42: Consistent prerequisites update. Aligns with the standardized API key guidance pattern across documentation.api-reference/introduction.mdx (1)
7-17: Clear API authentication guidance. The updated introduction with step-by-step key generation instructions and links to detailed guidance is a good improvement. The explicit app URL and link to detailed instructions provide a clear path for users.openllmetry/getting-started-nextjs.mdx (1)
210-233: Improved API key setup guidance with environment variable clarity. The replacement of verbose UI steps with a focused Note and explicitexport TRACELOOP_API_KEYexample makes the setup flow clearer. The troubleshooting tip with anchor link adds helpful context.Verify that the anchor link
/settings/managing-api-keys#troubleshootingresolves correctly. Looking at the managing-api-keys.mdx file, the "Troubleshooting" section begins at line 205, so the anchor should be valid.openllmetry/getting-started-ruby.mdx (1)
83-105: Consistent Ruby SDK setup guidance update. Mirrors the improvements made to the Next.js guide with clearer Note-based instructions, explicit environment variable example, and troubleshooting reference.mint.json (1)
181-187: The referenced file exists. Verification confirms thatsettings/projects-and-environments.mdxis present in the codebase at./settings/projects-and-environments.mdx. The navigation structure in mint.json correctly references both settings pages, and both files are available in the PR.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
openllmetry/getting-started-go.mdx (1)
112-135: Clear and consistent API key onboarding flow. The Note, environment variable export, and troubleshooting tip work together effectively to guide users through Traceloop setup.openllmetry/getting-started-ts.mdx (1)
109-131: Consistent with Go guide. The unified onboarding pattern across language guides strengthens the documentation.openllmetry/integrations/traceloop.mdx (2)
16-27: More granular step-by-step guidance appropriate for integrations context. The 5 numbered steps and clarification about project/environment scoping are more explicit than the getting-started guides, which is fitting for this section.
29-41: Helpful discovery path via Tip section. Directing users toward Projects and Environments documentation from the integration guide creates good cross-linking.openllmetry/getting-started-python.mdx (1)
89-111: Consistent with other language-specific guides. The harmonized pattern across Python, TypeScript, and Go guides creates a cohesive onboarding experience.settings/projects-and-environments.mdx (5)
35-66: Clear project definition and use-case guidance. The "When to Create a New Project" decision tree helps users make informed choices about project organization.
67-115: Thorough environment explanation with helpful cascading diagram. The distinction between organization-level and project-specific environments is well-explained, and the cascading behavior example clarifies a potentially complex concept.
117-252: Comprehensive setup and management guidance with appropriate safety warnings. The deletion warnings clearly communicate the irreversible nature of data loss, which is critical. The environment slug explanation (Line 160–162) is a helpful bridge to SDK implementation details.
267-425: Excellent best-practices and troubleshooting sections. The real-world scenarios (microservices, monorepo, multi-region) help users mentally model their own architecture, and the troubleshooting section is honest about limitations (e.g., "data cannot be moved between projects"). This builds user trust.
426-444: Strategic cross-linking in Related Resources. The four linked sections (Managing API Keys, Getting Started, Datasets, Prompts) help users navigate related workflows.
|
|
||
| Each API key is scoped to a specific **project + environment** combination: | ||
| - **Project**: Isolates data for different applications or services (e.g., "web-app", "api-service") | ||
| - **Environment**: Separates deployment stages (dev, stg, prd) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - **Environment**: Separates deployment stages (dev, stg, prd) | |
| - **Environment**: Separates deployment stages (development, staging, production) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I saw that we explicitly name these dev, stg, prd, or is this only in our account? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Its an inconsistincey in our system, in all pages dropdown they appear like I said, we should fix this in the settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmmm but that means changing the slug 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would solve this in a separate scope
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 00b29d6 in 2 minutes and 9 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
106lines of code in6files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. openllmetry/getting-started-go.mdx:117
- Draft comment:
Emoji added for the warning enhances visual emphasis. Ensure it aligns with accessibility (e.g., screen readers). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%None
2. openllmetry/getting-started-nextjs.mdx:216
- Draft comment:
Emoji added to the warning is a nice touch. Confirm accessibility for users relying on assistive tech. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%None
3. openllmetry/getting-started-python.mdx:94
- Draft comment:
Emoji addition in the warning is consistent. Ensure it meets accessibility requirements. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%None
4. openllmetry/getting-started-python.mdx:134
- Draft comment:
Removal of the 'Multiple Environments from One Application' snippet: ensure that alternative guidance is provided if needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. openllmetry/getting-started-ruby.mdx:88
- Draft comment:
Updated warning with an emoji looks good and is consistent with other guides. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%None
6. openllmetry/getting-started-ts.mdx:114
- Draft comment:
Emoji in the warning enhances the alert. Verify accessibility support. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%None
7. settings/managing-api-keys.mdx:59
- Draft comment:
Updated project description to 'applications or teams' is acceptable if intentional; ensure consistency across docs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_veMTr0AaoYCrGTqq
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
openllmetry/getting-started-go.mdx (1)
112-120: Note on emphasis consistency — see parallel concern on getting-started-nextjs.mdx.This follows the same pattern as the Next.js guide. Ensure the
⚠️ emoji styling and link formatting provide adequate visibility for the security-critical "copy immediately" guidance.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.gitignore(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-go.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-nextjs.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-python.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-ruby.mdx(1 hunks)openllmetry/getting-started-ts.mdx(1 hunks)settings/managing-api-keys.mdx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- openllmetry/getting-started-ts.mdx
- openllmetry/getting-started-python.mdx
- openllmetry/getting-started-ruby.mdx
🔇 Additional comments (11)
.gitignore (1)
2-2: Verify the gitignore syntax for the new lock file rule.The pattern
.package-lock.jsonuses a leading dot, which is typically for hidden config files. Did you intendpackage-lock.json(without the dot)? Or if targeting pnpm or yarn lock files, consider*-lock.yamlorpnpm-lock.yamlrespectively.openllmetry/getting-started-nextjs.mdx (3)
211-219: Note block structure provides clear guidance but verify emphasis for security-sensitive steps.The new Note block consolidates API key generation into a concise reference with a direct link and a warning callout (
⚠️ ). This is an improvement in clarity, though it replaces component-level emphasis (the old Warning block). The text emoji and link to detailed instructions should compensate, but ensure this is sufficiently prominent for users.Confirm: Does the
⚠️ emoji + text styling provide adequate visibility on your docs site, particularly for the "Copy immediately" guidance? If not, consider using a Warning or Caution component nested or adjacent to the Note.
221-225: Environment variable export example is clear and correct.The export statement and inline formatting are appropriate for quick reference.
230-233: Troubleshooting tip adds practical guidance.Linking to the detailed troubleshooting section in
/settings/managing-api-keys#troubleshootingis helpful for users experiencing issues.openllmetry/getting-started-go.mdx (1)
122-126: Environment variable export example is consistent and correct.Matches the format used in other getting-started guides.
settings/managing-api-keys.mdx (6)
56-71: Clarify whether environment names (dev, stg, prd) are examples or Traceloop conventions.The documentation uses "dev, stg, prd" as fixed environment names (line 27, 60, 186). Based on the past review comment, confirm whether these are:
- Traceloop's actual internal environment naming standard (literal), or
- Generic examples that users can customize.
If they're user-customizable, consider adding a note like: "By default, Traceloop provides dev, stg, and prd environments, though you can customize these names in your workspace settings." Alternatively, if they're fixed, you may want to emphasize this more clearly.
59-59: Project naming examples are concrete and helpful.Using service-oriented names ("orders-service", "users-service") aligns with real-world architecture and makes the concept of project isolation immediately clear.
Also applies to: 69-70
64-66: Environment variable auto-use note is placed well.The clarification that
TRACELOOP_API_KEYis automatically picked up by the SDK if set is valuable and properly positioned in the "Understanding API Keys" section.
114-139: Multi-language code examples for project-specific initialization are complete and correct.The Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, and Go examples show practical patterns for passing API keys directly to the SDK when environment variables don't suffice. Each example is clear and idiomatic to its language.
174-194: Best practices card layout is effective.The four-card grid (Secret Management, Key Rotation, Separate Keys Per Environment, Limit Key Exposure) covers security fundamentals in an accessible, scannable format.
196-233: Troubleshooting section is thorough and well-structured.Four scenarios (Authentication Failed, Not Seeing Traces, Wrong Data Appearing, Multiple Applications) with clear solutions address the most common user pain points. This will reduce support burden.
doronkopit5
left a comment
doronkopit5
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just fix the extra line you forgot to delete before merge,
recommending you to view the preview before merging
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed c16660c in 1 minute and 4 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
42lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. settings/managing-api-keys.mdx:62
- Draft comment:
Confirm rewording from 'send' to 'save' is intentional for data transmission semantics. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. settings/managing-api-keys.mdx:138
- Draft comment:
Ensure removal of the redundant initialization snippet doesn't omit needed examples. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
3. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:240
- Draft comment:
The new ordered deletion steps improve clarity; verify they match the UI flow. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_BSiPzFAwUdwcneFp
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx (1)
18-18: Consider tightening wording for clarity."Get mixed together" reads as slightly verbose. "Get mixed" or "get combined" would be more concise while maintaining meaning.
-- Traces from different services get mixed together +- Traces from different services get mixed
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
settings/managing-api-keys.mdx(1 hunks)settings/projects-and-environments.mdx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- settings/managing-api-keys.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx
[style] ~18-~18: ‘mixed together’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...s: - Traces from different services get mixed together - Production data appears alongside dev...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_MIXED_TOGETHER)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx (2)
1-451: Document structure and content is comprehensive and well-organized.The page effectively explains the Projects and Environments feature with clear problem statements, setup instructions, best practices, and troubleshooting. The use of cards, tips, warnings, and step-by-step guides provides good user experience. Cross-references to related documentation (Managing API Keys, Getting Started) support navigation flow. Once the copy-paste error is fixed, this is ready for publication.
9-10: Asset paths verified and confirmed correct.Both referenced images exist at the specified paths:
./img/settings/projects-light.png✓./img/settings/projects-dark.png✓The paths in the code are correct for this Mintlify documentation site. No changes needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed dfa4a29 in 2 minutes and 11 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
42lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:227
- Draft comment:
Consider using 'three-dot menu' instead of '3 dot menu' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:248
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'enviornment' should be corrected to 'environment'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:250
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'enviornment' should be corrected to 'environment' in the button label. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_xhjs8XSVXRactLUg
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx (1)
15-22: Minor: Consider more concise phrasing.Line 18 uses "mixed together," which static analysis flags as potentially wordy. Consider a shorter alternative:
When you have multiple applications or deployment stages: -- Traces from different services get mixed together +- Traces from different services get mixed - Production data appears alongside development experimentsThis is optional and does not affect clarity.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx
[style] ~18-~18: ‘mixed together’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...s: - Traces from different services get mixed together - Production data appears alongside dev...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_MIXED_TOGETHER)
[grammar] ~229-~229: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...roject you want to delete 3. Click the 3 dot menu 4. Click Delete project 5. ...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
[grammar] ~248-~248: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...t: 1. Open the app settings 2. Find the enviornment you want to delete 3. Click the 3 dot m...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~249-~249: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...rnment you want to delete 3. Click the 3 dot menu 4. Click Delete enviornment...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
[grammar] ~250-~250: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ... Click the 3 dot menu 4. Click Delete enviornment 5. Confirm the deletion **Organization-le...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
settings/projects-and-environments.mdx (1)
233-262: Verify environment deletion instructions are complete and accurate.The "Deleting Environments" section has been updated from the previous review to correctly describe environment deletion (no longer duplicating project steps). However, please verify:
- Are these the actual UI steps users will follow?
- Are there any differences between organization-level and project-specific environment deletion flows that should be clarified?
- The distinction below (lines 254–261) clarifies deletion impact but could be integrated more clearly into the main steps.
The current structure is good; this is a verification request to ensure accuracy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed b7a2056 in 34 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
16lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:247
- Draft comment:
Typo fixed in step 2: changed 'enviornment' to 'environment'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative, as it only states that a typo was fixed. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
2. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:250
- Draft comment:
Typo fixed in step 4: corrected 'Delete enviornment' to 'Delete environment'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative, as it only mentions a typo correction without suggesting any action or improvement. It doesn't provide any actionable feedback or code suggestion.
3. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:248
- Draft comment:
Typographical Correction: Changed 'enviornment' to 'environment'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative as it only points out a typographical correction. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
4. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:250
- Draft comment:
Typographical Correction: Changed 'Delete enviornment' to 'Delete environment'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative as it only points out a typographical correction. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
Workflow ID: wflow_C7zV9taqhv3TpmlU
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 1eca8d4 in 31 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
22lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:229
- Draft comment:
Improved formatting: '3 dot menu' changed to '3-dot menu' ensures consistent hyphenation. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. settings/projects-and-environments.mdx:249
- Draft comment:
Consistent style: using '3-dot menu' improves clarity over '3 dot menu'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_oQf6ABGGvbTpBzl8
You can customize
Important
Introduces a new Settings navigation group for managing API keys and Projects & Environments, standardizes API authentication messaging, and updates documentation and ignore rules.
mint.json.settings/managing-api-keys.mdxand Projects & Environments insettings/projects-and-environments.mdx.api-reference/introduction.mdx.openllmetry/getting-started-python.mdx,openllmetry/getting-started-go.mdx, andopenllmetry/getting-started-nextjs.mdx.datasets/sdk-usage.mdxandexperiments/running-from-code.mdx.mint.json.This description was created by
for 1eca8d4. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores