Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Hello Tal, You are correct that the cleaning will produce different results based on whether there is clipping or not. There are a few ways you could try to work around this using the current pyAFQ outputs, but I think it is much easier for me to add a flag to pyAFQ to allow cleaning to optionally use the entire streamlines, even when clip_edges is true. I did that here: #201 Would you mind testing this for me? You can install it via: And then set, in segmentation_params, clip_edges=True and clean_unclipped=True Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
Thank you for your time and help.
I am currently using pyAFQ 3.0 with QSIPrep and MRtrix3 tractography.
Is there a recommended way to compute tract profiles using clip_edges=True, while still exporting the corresponding full (unclipped) bundles for visualization and QC?
If we run the segmentation twice (once with clip_edges=True and once with clip_edges=False), the outlier cleaning behaves differently and we get mismatched streamline counts.
I would appreciate any advice on the best practice for this workflow.
Thank you very much,
Tal Ohevia
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions