test(contracts): add missing unit test coverage#26
Merged
Conversation
AttestedSettlementVerifier: - zero intentId, settlementModule, account, amount return false - wrong isMint flag returns false MARKSettlementModule: - totalSettledMint/Burn accumulates across multiple intents - setVerifier rejects EOA address RYLA: - supportsInterface returns correct values - setMinter/setBurner revert on zero address - burn reverts on zero amount MARKBridgeAdapter: - setBridgeLimits resets epoch and accumulator mid-epoch 71 tests pass (was 59).
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@contracts/test/unit/RYLA.t.sol`:
- Around line 89-99: The tests testSetMinterRevertsForZeroAddress and
testSetBurnerRevertsForZeroAddress currently use a bare vm.expectRevert();
update them to assert the specific RYLA custom error selectors instead: use
vm.expectRevert(RYLA.ZeroAddress.selector) (and likewise pin
vm.expectRevert(RYLA.InvalidAmount.selector) for the burn zero-amount test if
present) so the suite verifies the exact ZeroAddress() (and InvalidAmount() for
burn) error is thrown by token.setMinter, token.setBurner (and token.burn)
rather than allowing any revert.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: b09e53ae-a5d2-4e2d-9ba7-683ab0534cc5
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
contracts/test/unit/RYLA.t.solcontracts/test/unit/bridge/MARKBridgeAdapter.t.solcontracts/test/unit/settlement/AttestedSettlementVerifier.t.solcontracts/test/unit/settlement/MARKSettlementModule.t.sol
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fills coverage gaps identified during code review across all four contract test suites.
Changes
AttestedSettlementVerifier (+5 tests)
MARKSettlementModule (+2 tests)
RYLA (+4 tests)
MARKBridgeAdapter (+1 test)
Scope
contractsVerification
forge test— 71/71 pass (was 59)Risk
None — test-only changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit