-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
Rename traefik.docker.* labels for Docker Swarm to traefik.swarm.* #11247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
c93ab7e to
e5406c6
Compare
|
Hii @kevinpollet @rtribotte . I am not sure why test-unit job is failing. I checked it fails on master as well. Is there a way to see a condensed summary of failing tests ? Could you please take a look at this PR when you get a chance and suggest me what can i do here ? |
|
Hello @anchal00, Thank you for your contribution. |
|
@anchal00 We relaunched the CI, everything is ok now. |
e5406c6 to
c3ac5fe
Compare
|
Hii @kevinpollet @rtribotte, could you please review this PR when you get a chance. Thankyou |
|
Hello @anchal00, We are reviewing this pull request, to iterate faster, can we push review commits on your branch? |
|
Hii @kevinpollet , Sure you can push review commits to my branch. It's fine by me, so please go ahead ! |
sdelicata
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
cd415e7 to
8992fb8
Compare
403b1ae to
c5fe086
Compare
c5fe086 to
dbb45fc
Compare
kevinpollet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 👍
rtribotte
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
What does this PR do?
This PR adds support for
traefik.swarm.*labels and deprecatestraefik.docker.*labels for docker SwarmMotivation
Resolution for #11244
(as per suggestions from @kevinpollet in #11207 (review) )
More
Additional Notes
I took the liberty to slightly refactor the code as well, in order to get rid of nested if-else blocks. I hope that's not a problem.