Skip to content

Conversation

@phbnf
Copy link
Collaborator

@phbnf phbnf commented Oct 2, 2025

This PR:

  • cleans our README a bit
  • points at IPng's deployment and Cheese tool

@pimvanpelt FYI - thanks again for providing 🧀 !

@phbnf phbnf requested a review from AlCutter October 2, 2025 11:25
@phbnf phbnf added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 2, 2025
@phbnf phbnf marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2025 11:25
@phbnf phbnf requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2025 11:25
Copy link
Collaborator

@AlCutter AlCutter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth linking from the POSIX readme to the main readme for the ipng overview and links rather than duplicating?

Don't feel strongly either way :)

@phbnf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

phbnf commented Oct 2, 2025

I'll leave the information duplicated for now, links are hard to maintain as well. The callout on the README is really go give visibility, the info in the posix readme is for folks who are really getting hands on with it. If we simplify the main README at some point, I wouldn't want that information to be removed from the POSIX readme inadvertently.

@phbnf phbnf merged commit 699cb96 into transparency-dev:main Oct 2, 2025
9 checks passed
@pimvanpelt
Copy link
Contributor

🧀 thank you very much for linking it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants