Skip to content

add: cleanup .gitignore decorator #1673

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2019
Merged

add: cleanup .gitignore decorator #1673

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2019

Conversation

@pared
Copy link
Contributor

@pared pared commented Mar 1, 2019

Fixes #1641

@pared pared force-pushed the 1641 branch 4 times, most recently from c6d1f53 to a47b136 Compare March 1, 2019 15:27
@pared pared requested review from dmpetrov and efiop March 1, 2019 15:50
efiop
efiop suggested changes Mar 1, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@efiop efiop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 🙂

efiop
efiop reviewed Mar 1, 2019
View reviewed changes
@pared pared force-pushed the 1641 branch 4 times, most recently from d3941da to 2c4fcd5 Compare March 5, 2019 13:17
@pared pared changed the title [WPI] add: cleanup .gitignore decorator add: cleanup .gitignore decorator Mar 5, 2019
@pared pared requested a review from efiop March 5, 2019 13:44
efiop
efiop suggested changes Mar 5, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@efiop efiop left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks really good! Is it worth creating something like @scm_context(or some better name) decorator that would do what revert_ignores_on_failure does and also remind_to_git_add logic that we've been talking about? What do you think?

@pared pared force-pushed the 1641 branch 4 times, most recently from 6724072 to c59df4a Compare March 6, 2019 09:52
efiop
efiop suggested changes Mar 6, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@efiop efiop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! A few more comments down below.

efiop
efiop suggested changes Mar 7, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@efiop efiop left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#1673 (comment)

Unit tests for that should be enough. E.g. something like mock add/run/imp/etc to raise an exception and check that scm_context did its job. No need to setup a full blown error scenario.

@pared pared requested a review from efiop March 7, 2019 14:59
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2019
Closed
efiop
efiop suggested changes Mar 11, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@efiop efiop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please rebase?

@pared pared requested a review from efiop March 11, 2019 21:56
efiop
efiop approved these changes Mar 13, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@efiop efiop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@efiop efiop merged commit ca64845 into treeverse:master Mar 13, 2019
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2019
Closed
@pared pared deleted the 1641 branch April 3, 2019 11:02
This was referenced Aug 7, 2020
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dmpetrov dmpetrov Awaiting requested review from dmpetrov

1 more reviewer

@efiop efiop efiop approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pared @efiop