Skip to content

rwlock: include actionable in error message #3270

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 5, 2020
Merged

rwlock: include actionable in error message #3270

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
1c17d02
rwlock: include actionable in error message
Jan 31, 2020
e6ed5cc
rwlock: check blockers on a single method
Feb 5, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
49 changes: 18 additions & 31 deletions dvc/rwlock.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
from contextlib import contextmanager

from voluptuous import Schema, Invalid
from funcy.py3 import lmap, lfilter, lmapcat

from .exceptions import DvcException
from .lock import LockError
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -61,38 +60,25 @@ def _infos_to_str(infos):
)


def _check_no_writers(lock, info, path_infos):
for path_info in path_infos:
blocking_urls = lfilter(path_info.overlaps, lock["write"])
if not blocking_urls:
continue
def _check_blockers(lock, info, *, mode, waiters):
for path_info in waiters:
blockers = [
info
for path, infos in lock[mode].items()
if path_info.overlaps(path)
if info not in (infos if type(infos) is list else [infos])
]
Comment on lines +65 to +70
Copy link
Contributor

@Suor Suor Feb 6, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic is broken now. We create a list of info passed as param repeated 0 to several times, while in previous logic we were listing infos we've got from lock.

The right logic I guess is:

blockers = [
    blocker
    for path, infos in lock[mode].items()
    if path_info.overlaps(path)
    for blocker in (infos if isinstance(infos, list) else [infos])
    if blocker != info
]

Copy link
Contributor

@Suor Suor Feb 6, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in #3285.


writers = lmap(lock["write"].get, blocking_urls)
writers = lfilter(lambda i: info != i, writers)
if not writers:
if not blockers:
continue

raise LockError(
"'{}' is busy, it is being written to by:\n{}".format(
str(path_info), _infos_to_str(writers)
)
)


def _check_no_readers(lock, info, path_infos):
for path_info in path_infos:
blocking_urls = lfilter(path_info.overlaps, lock["read"])
if not blocking_urls:
continue

readers = lmapcat(lock["read"].get, blocking_urls)
readers = lfilter(lambda i: info != i, readers)
if not readers:
continue

raise LockError(
"'{}' is busy, it is being read by:\n{}".format(
str(path_info), _infos_to_str(readers)
"'{path}' is busy, it is being blocked by:\n"
"{blockers}\n"
"\n"
"If there are no processes with such PIDs, you can manually remove"
"'.dvc/tmp/rwlock' and try again.".format(
path=str(path_info), blockers=_infos_to_str(blockers)
)
)

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -171,8 +157,9 @@ def rwlock(tmp_dir, cmd, read, write):
info = {"pid": os.getpid(), "cmd": cmd}

with _edit_rwlock(tmp_dir) as lock:
_check_no_writers(lock, info, read + write)
_check_no_readers(lock, info, write)

_check_blockers(lock, info, mode="write", waiters=read + write)
_check_blockers(lock, info, mode="read", waiters=write)

rchanges = _acquire_read(lock, info, read)
wchanges = _acquire_write(lock, info, write)
Expand Down