Skip to content

Conversation

@skshetry
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. πŸ™

Yet Another Tree Abstraction 😒

@skshetry skshetry requested a review from efiop August 13, 2020 17:52
Comment on lines +79 to +80
t = tree._get_tree( # pylint: disable=protected-access
info
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is of-course going to be fixed by stats() as I said in other PR.

@efiop
Copy link
Contributor

efiop commented Aug 15, 2020

No longer relevant, since #4381 is merged.

@efiop efiop closed this Aug 15, 2020
@skshetry skshetry deleted the repo-tree-separate-abstraction branch August 15, 2020 14:30
@skshetry
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@efiop, I thought you'd like this? Anyway, thanks for merging. :)

@efiop
Copy link
Contributor

efiop commented Aug 15, 2020

@skshetry I like it, but the other PR is more wholesome :) I think we'll definitely introduce some good ideas from this PR in the upcoming changes πŸ™‚

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants