Skip to content

Conversation

@amit9oct
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@amit9oct amit9oct requested a review from Copilot March 31, 2025 07:07
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the Lean4 testing and execution functionality by refining the build command, extending test coverage for the "have" tactic, and enhancing goal text aggregation for unsolved proof states.

  • Updated the project build command in tests to include "lake exe cache get".
  • Added a new test method (test_simple_lean4_have_test) to validate the handling of the "have" tactic.
  • Modified goal text collection in the Lean4 executor to support multiple unsolved messages.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
src/test/simple_env_test.py Updated build command and added a new test to validate "have" tactic handling.
src/itp_interface/tools/lean4_sync_executor.py Refactored goal text handling for unsolved messages to support multiple entries.
pyproject.toml Incremented version number to 1.1.10.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • src/data/test/lean4_proj/Lean4Proj/Basic.lean: Language not supported
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/test/simple_env_test.py:546

  • [nitpick] Consider adding explicit assertions that validate the proof state rather than solely relying on exception raising when the proof finishes.
if done:

src/itp_interface/tools/lean4_sync_executor.py:870

  • [nitpick] Consider adding unit tests to verify that the updated handling of multiple goal texts correctly aggregates unsolved proof goals under various scenarios.
if len(goal_texts) == 0:

@amit9oct amit9oct merged commit 7394c79 into main Mar 31, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants