Skip to content

Conversation

@w3nl
Copy link
Contributor

@w3nl w3nl commented Jun 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated the app version to 1.12.0.
  • Refactor

    • Improved the response validation process to allow enhanced error logging with contextual details.

502

@w3nl w3nl requested a review from Copilot June 4, 2025 12:49
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes update the version in package.json, refactor the response validation handler to use a logger-aware higher-order function, and adjust the router setup to instantiate the response validation handler with a logger. No other dependencies, scripts, or exported entities are altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
package.json Updated version from "1.11.2" to "1.12.0".
src/handlers/response-validation.js Refactored to export a default higher-order function accepting a logger; added conditional logging.
src/router.js Changed to import and instantiate the response validation handler with a logger parameter.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Router
    participant Logger
    participant ResponseValidation

    Router->>Logger: Pass logger instance
    Router->>ResponseValidation: Instantiate with logger (makeResponseValidation(logger))
    Router->>ResponseValidation: Call as postResponseHandler (context, request, response)
    ResponseValidation->>Logger: Log error if validation fails (conditional)
Loading

Poem

A bunny with code in its paws,
Hopped in to tweak some laws—
Now logs are aware,
Of responses they share,
And the version hops forward—applause!
🐇✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

This comment was marked as outdated.

@w3nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

w3nl commented Jun 4, 2025

@coderabbitai summary

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Summary regeneration triggered.

@w3nl w3nl requested a review from Copilot June 4, 2025 13:00
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the response validation flow to emit structured error logs and bumps the package version to 1.12.0.

  • Refactored responseValidation into a factory (makeResponseValidation) that accepts a logger
  • Updated setupRouter to instantiate response validation with the injected logger
  • Added a basic logger mock in the router tests and bumped the app version

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
src/router.test.js Added a logger mock and adjusted the test invocation to include it
src/router.js Swapped the named import for responseValidation to makeResponseValidation(logger)
src/handlers/response-validation.js Converted to a default-export factory and added logger.error logging on validation failures
package.json Updated version from 1.11.2 to 1.12.0
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/handlers/response-validation.js:12

  • No existing tests cover the new error-logging path. Add a test that forces a validation failure and asserts that logger.error is called with the expected payload.
if (logger) {

src/handlers/response-validation.js:1

  • Update or add JSDoc above this export to explain that this is now a factory accepting a logger and returns the validation handler.
export default (logger) => (context, request, response) => {

return originalAjv
}
},
logger
Copy link

Copilot AI Jun 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The logger is being passed as a separate argument rather than inside the options object. It should be moved into the object literal (e.g., { ..., logger }) so it’s correctly injected by setupRouter.

Suggested change
logger
logger: logger

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@w3nl w3nl merged commit d0bddfd into v1.x Jun 4, 2025
11 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant