Skip to content

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Aug 1, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Citations now include information about the index of the content block in which they appear.
    • Added support for a new citation type, "Thinking Content", expanding the recognized contexts for citations.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The OpenAPI specification for the Citation object was updated by introducing a new integer property, content_index, to indicate the citation's content block index. Additionally, the CitationType enum was extended with a new value, THINKING_CONTENT, expanding the recognized citation contexts.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
OpenAPI Citation Schema Update
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml
Added content_index property to Citation object and introduced THINKING_CONTENT to CitationType enum.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

In the fields of YAML, neat and bright,
A new index hops into sight.
Citations now know where they dwell,
And THINKING_CONTENT joins as well.
With enum hops and schema cheer,
The docs grow clearer, year by year!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202508011834

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@HavenDV HavenDV enabled auto-merge (squash) August 1, 2025 18:35
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit 940fc8b into main Aug 1, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202508011834 branch August 1, 2025 18:37
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Add content_index to Citation and THINKING_CONTENT to CitationType enum Aug 1, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (1)

13177-13179: Clarify constraints for the new content_index field

Good addition. To avoid ambiguity and enable stronger validation downstream, consider specifying explicit constraints:

  1. Add minimum: 0 (or exclusiveMinimum: -1) so negative indices are rejected.
  2. Add format: int32 to be consistent with other integer fields if you already use it elsewhere.
  3. If content_index is required for all citations, remember to list it in the required: array for the Citation schema; otherwise clients may treat it as optional and ignore it.
         content_index:
           type: integer
+          format: int32
+          minimum: 0
           description: Index of the content block in which this citation appears.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61a04c7 and f8a6322.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.Citation.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.CitationType.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test / Build, test and publish
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (1)

13241-13243: Ensure enum documentation & consumers cover THINKING_CONTENT

THINKING_CONTENT slots in cleanly, but two follow-ups are easy to miss:

  1. Extend the description string (Line 13245) so published docs mention the new value—otherwise generators may omit it.
  2. Verify every switch / if-else on CitationType in SDKs & services now handles THINKING_CONTENT; otherwise they will raise “unsupported type” errors at runtime.

No spec change needed here—just double-check docs and code paths.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants