Skip to content

feat:Add unix_timestamp format to from in payment usage OpenAPI docs#211

Merged
HavenDV merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bot/update-openapi_202508181522
Aug 18, 2025
Merged

feat:Add unix_timestamp format to from in payment usage OpenAPI docs#211
HavenDV merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bot/update-openapi_202508181522

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Aug 18, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated API documentation to clarify accepted formats for the "from" query parameter on payment usage endpoints.
    • The parameter now explicitly documents support for YYYY.MM, current(-N), and Unix timestamp (seconds, UTC).
    • Applied to both payment usage endpoints to ensure consistency and reduce ambiguity for integrators.
    • No changes to parameter requirements, types, or responses; this is a clarification to improve understanding and usage.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Walkthrough

OpenAPI descriptions were updated for the “from” query parameter and the “From” schema to mention unix_timestamp (seconds, UTC) formatting alongside existing YYYY.MM and current(-N) formats for GET /payment/usage and GET /payment/usage/{api_token}. No types, requirements, or responses changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
OpenAPI docs
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml
Expanded description text for the “from” query parameter and “From” schema to include unix_timestamp (seconds, UTC) format for GET /payment/usage and GET /payment/usage/{api_token}; no structural or type changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my ears at timestamps new,
From months to unix seconds too.
Two usage paths now clearly say
Which time to send, which time to pay.
I stamp my paw—docs aligned, neat!
Hippity-hop, compliance complete. 🐇⏱️

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202508181522

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@HavenDV HavenDV enabled auto-merge (squash) August 18, 2025 15:23
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit 1fff4aa into main Aug 18, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202508181522 branch August 18, 2025 15:24
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Add unix_timestamp format to from in payment usage OpenAPI docs Aug 18, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (5)

3560-3568: Consider adding concrete examples to reduce ambiguity for multi-format "from" parameter

Type is string while allowing a unix timestamp; adding named examples will make client generation and human usage clearer without changing the schema shape.

Apply this diff to include examples alongside the updated description:

         - name: from
           in: query
-          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+          examples:
+            yyyy_mm:
+              summary: Year and month
+              value: '2025.08'
+            relative:
+              summary: Relative current month
+              value: 'current-1'
+            unix_ts:
+              summary: Unix timestamp (seconds, UTC)
+              value: '1723939200'
           required: true
           schema:
             title: From
-            type: string
-            description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+            type: string
+            description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'

3560-3568: Optional: Model the input more precisely with oneOf (string formats or integer unix ts)

If the backend accepts both numeric and string inputs, you can advertise that precisely and help codegen by using oneOf. If not, skip this.

         - name: from
           in: query
-          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
           required: true
           schema:
             title: From
-            type: string
-            description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+            oneOf:
+              - type: string
+                description: "YYYY.MM or 'current' or 'current-N'"
+              - type: integer
+                format: int64
+                description: 'Unix timestamp in seconds (UTC)'

Note: This is a non-breaking documentation improvement if the server already accepts both representations.


3562-3562: Nit: Align terminology with the rest of the spec

Elsewhere you use phrasing like "seconds since unix epoch". Consider changing "unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC)" to "seconds since Unix epoch (UTC)" for consistency.

-          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), seconds since Unix epoch (UTC) format'
...
-            description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+            description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), seconds since Unix epoch (UTC) format'

Also applies to: 3567-3567


3640-3654: DRY the “from” parameter across both usage endpoints to prevent drift

You updated the description in two places. To avoid future inconsistencies, extract a shared parameter in components and $ref it here and in /payment/usage.

Minimal change here (reference a shared parameter):

-        - name: from
-          in: query
-          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
-          required: true
-          schema:
-            title: From
-            type: string
-            description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/UsageFromParam'

And add this parameter once under components (outside this hunk):

components:
  parameters:
    UsageFromParam:
      name: from
      in: query
      description: "start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), seconds since Unix epoch (UTC) format"
      required: true
      examples:
        yyyy_mm:
          summary: Year and month
          value: "2025.08"
        relative:
          summary: Relative current month
          value: "current-1"
        unix_ts:
          summary: Unix timestamp (seconds, UTC)
          value: "1723939200"
      schema:
        type: string
        description: "start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), seconds since Unix epoch (UTC) format"

3648-3654: Mirror the examples/oneOf enhancement on the token-specific endpoint as well

Keep both endpoints aligned to avoid client confusion.

Apply this diff mirroring the examples block:

         - name: from
           in: query
-          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+          description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+          examples:
+            yyyy_mm:
+              summary: Year and month
+              value: '2025.08'
+            relative:
+              summary: Relative current month
+              value: 'current-1'
+            unix_ts:
+              summary: Unix timestamp (seconds, UTC)
+              value: '1723939200'
           required: true
           schema:
             title: From
             type: string
-            description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
+            description: 'start of period in YYYY.MM, current(-N), unix_timestamp (in seconds, UTC) format'
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 137183a and b407a69.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.DeepInfraClient.Usage.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.DeepInfraClient.UsageApiToken.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.IDeepInfraClient.Usage.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.IDeepInfraClient.UsageApiToken.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test / Build, test and publish

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant