refactor: remove unused models and comments from Prisma schema files … #221
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive refactoring of the application's architecture, focusing on session management, database models, and organizational context. The changes span multiple components and actions across the application, transitioning from a user-based to a session-based approach for managing organization identifiers. Key modifications include updating database queries from Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Session
participant Database
participant Components
User->>Session: Authenticate
Session-->>User: Return activeOrganizationId
User->>Database: Query with activeOrganizationId
Database-->>User: Return organization-specific data
User->>Components: Render with organization context
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/db/prisma/schema/policy.prisma (1)
1-23: 💡 Verification agent🧩 Analysis chain
Review OrganizationPolicy Model Structure
TheOrganizationPolicymodel appears to retain relationships (e.g. withOrganizationControlRequirement) and various policy-related fields. Since this PR’s objective is to streamline models by removing unused ones (likePolicy,PolicyComments, etc.), please verify if all the remaining relations and fields in this model are still required and consistent with the new design.
Below is a shell script that checks whether the related models referenced in the
OrganizationPolicymodel (namely,OrganizationControlRequirement,Organization,User, andDepartments) are still defined in the Prisma schema. This information will help verify that all remaining relations and fields in the model are in use and consistent with the new design.Once these queries execute, please review the results to confirm whether:
- The
OrganizationControlRequirementmodel still exists and is actively used.- The related models (
Organization,User, andDepartments) are present and consistent with the new streamlined design.After verifying these findings, we can update our review comment accordingly.
If the related models are confirmed in the codebase and their usage is justified by the new design, the review comment can be resolved. Otherwise, adjustments or additional refactoring may be required.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash echo "Verifying related models in the Prisma schema..." echo "Searching for model OrganizationControlRequirement:" rg "model OrganizationControlRequirement" -n . echo "Searching for model Organization:" rg "model Organization" -n . echo "Searching for model User:" rg "model User" -n . echo "Searching for model Departments:" rg "model Departments" -n .Length of output: 1750
Review OrganizationPolicy Model Structure – Action Required
Upon verifying the relations in the schema:
- OrganizationControlRequirement, Organization, and User models are present and used.
- Departments is referenced by the
departmentfield in theOrganizationPolicymodel, but no correspondingDepartmentsmodel was found in the codebase.Please verify whether the
departmentfield is still necessary and if it should reference an existing model (potentially renamed to, for example,Department) or be removed to achieve consistency with the new design. Adjust the model accordingly based on the intended streamlined architecture.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/db/prisma/schema/framework.prisma (1)
3-15: Confirm Use offrameworkIdin OrganizationFramework
With the removal of theFrameworkmodel, theOrganizationFrameworkmodel now holdsframeworkIdas a plain string. Verify that this field is still needed (for historical reference or for linkage via an alternate mechanism) and that any application logic relying on an actual relation is updated accordingly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
packages/db/prisma/schema/cloud.prisma(0 hunks)packages/db/prisma/schema/employee.prisma(0 hunks)packages/db/prisma/schema/framework.prisma(1 hunks)packages/db/prisma/schema/policy.prisma(1 hunks)packages/db/prisma/schema/portal.prisma(0 hunks)packages/db/prisma/schema/risk.prisma(0 hunks)packages/db/prisma/schema/schema.prisma(0 hunks)packages/db/prisma/schema/vendor.prisma(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
- packages/db/prisma/schema/cloud.prisma
- packages/db/prisma/schema/vendor.prisma
- packages/db/prisma/schema/employee.prisma
- packages/db/prisma/schema/risk.prisma
- packages/db/prisma/schema/portal.prisma
- packages/db/prisma/schema/schema.prisma
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/db/prisma/schema/policy.prisma (1)
27-35: Validate PolicyFile Model Consistency
ThePolicyFilemodel is introduced cleanly with standard timestamp default values. Please ensure this model’s structure and field naming align with your overall refactoring of policy management.packages/db/prisma/schema/framework.prisma (5)
28-45: Review OrganizationControl Model Integrity
TheOrganizationControlmodel is intact and preserves crucial relationships and indexes. However, since theControlmodel (which it once referenced) has been removed, please double-check that thecontrolIdfield and associated indices are still valid for your current data requirements.
49-68: Examine OrganizationControlRequirement Relationships
This model retains relations toOrganizationPolicy,OrganizationEvidence, andOrganizationControl. Ensure that these relationships are still meaningful after the refactor—especially considering the adjustments in policy-related models.
84-109:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Review
frameworkIdPresence in OrganizationEvidence
Similar to other models,OrganizationEvidenceincludes aframeworkIdfield. Since there is no correspondingFrameworkmodel anymore, please check if retaining this field is intentional—is it used for external reference or historical data? If not, consider removing it for clarity.
Action Required: Verify the purpose of
frameworkIdin OrganizationEvidenceIt appears that the
OrganizationEvidencemodel still includes aframeworkIdfield even though the correspondingFrameworkmodel is no longer in the codebase. Please verify if this field is retained intentionally for external references or historical data. If it doesn’t serve a necessary purpose, consider removing it to improve schema clarity.
- Location:
packages/db/prisma/schema/framework.prisma(Lines 84-109)
17-25:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Assess
FrameworkCategoryModel Fields
TheFrameworkCategorymodel contains aframeworkIdfield that no longer functions as a foreign key, given the removal of theFrameworkmodel. Confirm whether this field should be repurposed as a simple identifier or removed entirely to avoid potential confusion.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of "frameworkId" across the repository to determine its usage context. rg "frameworkId" -n .Length of output: 19179
ACTION: Confirm and Update the Usage of the
frameworkIdFieldThe
FrameworkCategorymodel now defines theframeworkIdfield as a plainStringwithout a relation attribute. Our repository-wide search confirms that this field is still actively used (for instance, in seed scripts and various query files) purely as an identifier. However, note that legacy migration files (e.g., inmigrations/0_init/migration.sqlat line 900) still include a foreign key constraint referencing the removedFrameworkmodel, which could lead to confusion or inconsistency.
- Verify that the intent is to have
frameworkIdserve solely as an identifier.- If so, update or remove any outdated migration constraints that reference the old
Frameworkmodel.- Alternatively, if a relational link is still desired, consider how to reinstate it given the current code usage.
Please confirm the intended design so that we can adjust the schema and migrations accordingly.
70-82:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Reevaluate
frameworkIdin OrganizationCategory
TheOrganizationCategorymodel still contains aframeworkIdfield. Given that the actualFrameworkmodel has been removed, determine if this field is necessary (perhaps as a legacy identifier) or if it should be eliminated to further simplify the schema and avoid misleading data associations.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the Framework model has indeed been removed from the Prisma schema. echo "Searching for 'model Framework' definitions in Prisma schema files..." rg "model Framework" packages/db/prisma/schema # Check for any references to 'frameworkId' in the codebase. echo "Searching for usage of 'frameworkId' across the repository..." rg "frameworkId" .Length of output: 19025
Action Required: Verify the necessity and consistency of the
frameworkIdfield in the OrganizationCategory modelIt appears that while the explicit
Frameworkmodel has been removed from the Prisma schema, theframeworkIdfield inOrganizationCategoryis still widely referenced throughout the codebase—in migrations, seeds, and multiple application files. In particular:
- Migration files (e.g.,
20250212210730_add_framework_id_to_org_cat/migration.sql) set up a foreign key onframeworkIdreferencing a non-existentFrameworkmodel.- Seed scripts and various components (e.g., files under
packages/db/prisma/seed.tsand the organization creation logic) continue to utilizeframeworkIdas an identifier.Please verify whether this field is meant to serve as a legacy identifier—or if it should be updated (for example, to reference the new
FrameworkCategorymodel or another appropriate entity) and its associated foreign key constraints adjusted accordingly. Careful review is needed to ensure data integrity and avoid misleading associations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/app/src/data/frameworks.ts (1)
1-35:⚠️ Potential issueDuplicate file detected - consider removing this one
This file appears to be a duplicate of
packages/data/src/frameworks.ts. Since you're setting up the@bubba/datapackage to provide this data, this local copy is unnecessary and could lead to maintenance issues. Consider removing this file and importing from@bubba/datainstead.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/db/prisma/migrations/20250328174401_drop_unused_tables/migration.sql (3)
1-25: Warning Section Clarity and Risk MitigationThe warning block clearly articulates the data loss risks associated with dropping each table. To further enhance safety, consider adding a reminder to back up data before execution and note that wrapping these operations in a transaction can help avoid partial failures.
26-169: Foreign Key Constraints Removal: Increase RobustnessThe script methodically removes foreign key constraints before dropping tables, which is essential to avoid dependency issues. To further improve robustness:
- Use
IF EXISTS: IncorporateIF EXISTSin eachDROP CONSTRAINTstatement to prevent errors in case the constraint has already been removed.- Consider Transaction Wrapping: Wrapping these commands in a transaction can ensure atomicity, preventing the schema from ending in an inconsistent state if one command fails.
For example:
-ALTER TABLE "Artifact" DROP CONSTRAINT "Artifact_organizationId_fkey"; +ALTER TABLE "Artifact" DROP CONSTRAINT IF EXISTS "Artifact_organizationId_fkey";Apply similar modifications to all foreign key drop commands.
170-228: Table Dropping Commands: Enhance Safety MeasuresThe series of
DROP TABLEcommands effectively removes the unused tables. For better safety and idempotence:
- Use
IF EXISTS: Modify eachDROP TABLEcommand to includeIF EXISTSto avoid errors when a table is already absent.- Consider Transaction Wrapping: Enclosing these commands within a transaction ensures that either all tables are dropped or none are, avoiding partial schema changes.
For example:
-DROP TABLE "Artifact"; +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS "Artifact";Apply similar updates to the other
DROP TABLEcommands as needed.packages/data/package.json (1)
16-17: Consider pinning exact dependency versionsUsing caret (^) in version constraints allows for automatic updates to compatible minor and patch versions, which might lead to subtle inconsistencies in builds. For development tooling in particular, consider using exact versions to ensure build reproducibility.
"devDependencies": { - "tsup": "^8.0.1", - "typescript": "^5.7.3" + "tsup": "8.0.1", + "typescript": "5.7.3" }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
bun.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockpackages/data/dist/index.d.mtsis excluded by!**/dist/**packages/data/dist/index.d.tsis excluded by!**/dist/**packages/data/dist/index.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**packages/data/dist/index.mjsis excluded by!**/dist/**yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
apps/app/next.config.ts(1 hunks)apps/app/package.json(1 hunks)apps/app/src/components/sidebar.tsx(1 hunks)apps/app/src/data/frameworks.ts(1 hunks)apps/app/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)packages/data/frameworks.json(0 hunks)packages/data/package.json(1 hunks)packages/data/src/frameworks.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/db/prisma/migrations/20250328174401_drop_unused_tables/migration.sql(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/data/frameworks.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- package.json
- apps/app/tsconfig.json
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/data/src/index.ts (1)
2-3: Looks good - exporting framework data from the data package.The addition of these export statements aligns well with the PR's goal of removing unused models from Prisma schema files. This approach moves framework data from database models to statically defined TypeScript modules.
apps/app/next.config.ts (1)
14-14: Configuration correctly updated for transpiling the new data package.The addition of
"@bubba/data"to the transpilePackages array is necessary when adding a new local package dependency to ensure proper transpilation during the build process.apps/app/package.json (1)
24-24: Proper workspace dependency added for the data package.The addition of
@bubba/dataas a workspace dependency is correctly implemented with theworkspace:*version specifier, which is the standard pattern for local packages in a monorepo.apps/app/src/components/sidebar.tsx (1)
3-3: Good architectural change - moving from database-sourced to statically defined framework data.This change simplifies the code by removing a database query for what appears to be relatively static framework data. It aligns perfectly with the PR's goal of removing unused Prisma models while potentially improving performance.
packages/data/src/frameworks.ts (2)
16-16: Review the version formatUsing "2025" as a version string is unusual. Version strings typically follow semantic versioning (e.g., "1.0.0") or specific release identifiers. If this represents a year-based standard, consider adding a comment to clarify.
Also applies to: 22-22, 28-28
1-36:Details
✅ Verification successful
Update the index.ts file to export the frameworks
Since this file is in the
@bubba/datapackage, ensure that it's properly exported in the package's entry point (src/index.ts) to make it available for importing in other parts of the application.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if frameworks are exported in the index file if [ -f "packages/data/src/index.ts" ]; then echo "Content of index.ts:" cat packages/data/src/index.ts echo "" echo "Checking for frameworks export:" grep -i "framework" packages/data/src/index.ts else echo "Index file does not exist yet" fiLength of output: 463
Index Export Update Verified:
The export offrameworksinpackages/data/src/index.tsis now correctly implemented. The file includes both the default export and a re-export through theexport * from "./frameworks";statement, making the frameworks accessible as intended. No further changes are required.packages/data/package.json (1)
1-19: LGTM! Package configuration looks goodThe package configuration is well structured with:
- Proper entry points for CommonJS, ES modules, and TypeScript declarations
- Comprehensive scripts for building, development, linting, and cleaning
- Essential development dependencies
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.ts (1)
3-22: Consider providing unique descriptions for each framework.All three frameworks currently share the exact same description. Each framework serves different purposes and has unique characteristics that should be reflected in their descriptions.
export const frameworks: Frameworks = { soc2: { name: "SOC 2", version: "2025", description: - "SOC 2 is a framework for assessing the security and reliability of information systems.", + "SOC 2 is a framework focusing on controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of customer data.", }, iso27001: { name: "ISO 27001", version: "2025", description: - "ISO 27001 is a framework for assessing the security and reliability of information systems.", + "ISO 27001 is an international standard for information security management systems (ISMS) that provides a systematic approach to managing sensitive company information.", }, gdpr: { name: "GDPR", version: "2025", description: - "GDPR is a framework for assessing the security and reliability of information systems.", + "GDPR is a regulation that establishes rules for data protection and privacy in the European Union and the European Economic Area, focusing on data subject rights and organizational compliance.", }, };packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
54-55: Consider implementing the commented-out Policies typeThe commented-out
Policiestype would be useful for managing collections of policies. Since you've implemented multiple policy files, it would be beneficial to uncomment and implement this type to create a centralized policies registry.-// Optional: If you plan to have a map of all policies similar to frameworks.ts -// export type Policies = Record<string, Policy>; +/** + * A map of all policies, indexed by their IDs. + */ +export type Policies = Record<string, Policy>; + +/** + * Creates a policies registry from a collection of policy objects. + */ +export function createPoliciesRegistry(policies: Policy[]): Policies { + return policies.reduce((acc, policy) => { + acc[policy.metadata.id] = policy; + return acc; + }, {} as Policies); +}packages/data/src/policies/data/business-continuity.policy.ts (1)
3-163: Well-structured business continuity policy with proper SOC 2 mappingThe business continuity policy implementation follows the same clean structure as the change management policy. It properly maps to relevant SOC 2 controls (
CC7.3,A1.3,CC9.1,CC9.9) which align with disaster recovery requirements.One minor difference to note is the use of
as constat line 163, which isn't present in the change-management.policy.ts file. While this ensures type safety at compile time, you should standardize this approach across all policy files for consistency.Consider standardizing the use of
as constacross all policy files for consistency:-} as const; +};Or add it to all policy files if type safety at this level is preferred.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
bun.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockpackages/data/dist/index.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**packages/data/dist/index.mjsis excluded by!**/dist/**yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
apps/app/src/components/forms/risks/risk-overview.tsx(2 hunks)apps/app/src/components/organization-switcher.tsx(1 hunks)apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/access.json(0 hunks)apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/application.json(0 hunks)apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/availability.json(0 hunks)apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/change.json(0 hunks)apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/classification.json(0 hunks)apps/app/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/data/controls/soc2.json(0 hunks)packages/data/policies/access_control.json(0 hunks)packages/data/policies/application_security.json(0 hunks)packages/data/policies/availability.json(0 hunks)packages/data/policies/business_continuity.json(0 hunks)packages/data/policies/change_management.json(0 hunks)packages/data/src/controls/soc2.json(1 hunks)packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.types.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/access-control.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/application-security.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/availability.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/business-continuity.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/change-management.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts(1 hunks)packages/db/prisma/seed.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (11)
- apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/access.json
- apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/change.json
- packages/data/policies/change_management.json
- packages/data/policies/business_continuity.json
- packages/data/controls/soc2.json
- apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/application.json
- packages/data/policies/application_security.json
- packages/data/policies/availability.json
- apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/classification.json
- apps/app/src/jobs/seed/policies/availability.json
- packages/data/policies/access_control.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md
- packages/db/prisma/seed.ts
- apps/app/src/components/forms/risks/risk-overview.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/app/tsconfig.json
- packages/data/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (7)
packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.ts (1)
packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.types.ts (1)
Frameworks(7-11)
packages/data/src/policies/data/availability.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(39-52)
packages/data/src/policies/data/application-security.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(39-52)
packages/data/src/policies/data/change-management.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(39-52)
packages/data/src/policies/data/business-continuity.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(39-52)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.types.ts (1)
Frameworks(7-11)
packages/data/src/policies/data/access-control.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(39-52)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.types.ts (2)
1-5: Good interface design for Framework type.The interface provides a clear structure with essential properties for defining a framework.
7-11: Clean interface definition for Frameworks collection.The interface properly defines the collection of supported compliance frameworks, making it easy to access specific framework types in a type-safe manner.
packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.ts (2)
1-2: Proper import of types.The type import is correctly structured to maintain separation between types and implementations.
3-8: Verify if "2025" is the correct version for SOC 2.The version "2025" for all frameworks seems unusual. For SOC 2, versions are typically not represented by years. Please verify if this is the intended versioning scheme or if it should be updated to a more conventional format.
apps/app/src/components/organization-switcher.tsx (1)
21-22: Appropriate update of import source for Framework type.The change correctly separates imports, now getting
Frameworkfrom@bubba/datainstead of@bubba/db/types. This aligns with the refactoring effort to remove unused models from Prisma schema files.packages/data/src/policies/data/access-control.policy.ts (3)
3-16: Well-structured policy metadata with proper SOC 2 control mappings.The policy metadata is comprehensive, containing all necessary information including frequency of review, department ownership, and SOC 2 control mappings. This enables proper governance and compliance tracking.
17-155: Content structure follows a consistent document format.The policy content uses a well-organized document structure with appropriate headings, paragraphs, tables, and lists. This maintains consistency with other policy documents and improves readability.
156-156: Good use of 'as const' for type safety.Using
as constensures the policy object is treated as a read-only value with specific literal types, which enhances type safety and prevents accidental modifications.packages/data/src/controls/soc2.json (1)
1-894: Well-structured SOC 2 controls data implementationThis file provides a comprehensive set of SOC 2 controls organized by domain categories. Each control is properly structured with consistent fields including code, name, description, domain, categoryId, and associated artifacts.
The implementation follows good practices for SOC 2 compliance management:
- Clear organization by control domains (Control Environment, Communication, Risk Assessment, etc.)
- Consistent structure for artifacts with proper typing (policy, evidence, training)
- Explicit mapping between controls and policy documents through policyId references
This structured approach will make it easier to maintain compliance documentation and map controls to policies across the application.
packages/data/src/policies/data/change-management.policy.ts (1)
3-156: Clean implementation of the change management policyThe policy is well-structured with appropriate metadata and content organization. The explicit linking to SOC 2 controls (
CC3.4,CC8.1,CC6.7) ensures proper compliance mapping.The policy content follows a logical structure with clear sections for:
- Policy information (with organizational metadata)
- Purpose and scope
- Policy requirements (using ordered lists for clear steps)
- References
This implementation cleanly integrates with the
Policyinterface defined in the types file.packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (4)
3-8: Well-defined TextNode interface for policy contentThe TextNode interface provides a clean structure for representing basic text content within policies. Including the optional
marksproperty allows for future text formatting capabilities.
10-16: Flexible ContentNode interface with recursive structureThe recursive ContentNode interface is well-designed to handle various content types like paragraphs, headings, and lists. The flexibility of the
attrsand optionalcontentfields supports a wide range of document structures.
18-34: Comprehensive PolicyMetadata interface with compliance mappingThe PolicyMetadata interface effectively captures all essential policy attributes and includes a flexible
usedByfield that maps compliance frameworks to control identifiers. This enables proper traceability between policies and controls.
36-52: Clean Policy interface with well-documented propertiesThe Policy interface provides a clear structure for policy documents with appropriate JSDoc comments explaining each property. The separation of metadata from content follows good document structure practices.
packages/data/src/policies/data/availability.policy.ts (4)
1-2: File import is concise and accurate.
No issues found with the import statement.
3-16: Metadata structure validated.
TheavailabilityPolicyobject’s metadata fields (id, slug, name, description, etc.) properly match thePolicyinterface. Everything appears consistent and follows good naming conventions.
60-66: Confirm runtime replacement of placeholders.
These lines reference placeholders, such as{{organization}}and{{date}}. Verify that they are replaced or populated at runtime to avoid displaying raw placeholders to end users.Could you please confirm how these placeholders are dynamically resolved? If needed, I can generate a script or provide a suggestion for a placeholder replacement strategy.
17-706: Overall policy content approved with minor i18n consideration.
This extensive content is well structured, adhering to thePolicyinterface. Consider extracting constant text strings into a separate i18n or configuration layer if future localization or frequent updates are expected.packages/data/src/policies/data/application-security.policy.ts (4)
1-2: Import and type usage confirmed.
The import ofPolicyaligns well with the usage in this file. No syntax or naming issues found.
3-16: Metadata block looks good.
The policy ID, slug, department, and SOC2 references are consistent with the definedPolicyinterface. Everything is spelled out clearly.
60-66: Check placeholder usage.
Similar to the availability policy, the placeholders{{organization}}and{{date}}should be replaced at runtime to ensure the final displayed policy is accurate.Please verify your approach for rendering these placeholders in production.
3-649: Policy content structure appears correct.
The layout is well organized, listing headings, references, and assessment guidelines. The usage ofas constis a good choice to maintain immutability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/data/src/controls/soc2.json (1)
1-895: Overall JSON Structure for SOC2 Controls
This new JSON file introduces a comprehensive and well-organized definition of SOC2 controls across multiple domains. Each control object consistently provides fields such ascode,name,description,domain,requirementId, and anartifactsarray with detailed artifact information. This thorough structure should help downstream consumers (for example, the new TypeScript frameworks in the data package) integrate these controls reliably.Recommendations:
- Schema Validation: Consider defining and applying a JSON Schema to enforce the consistency and validity of the control definitions. This will help catch structural issues early as the list of controls evolves.
- Modular Organization: As the number of controls grows, you might evaluate splitting the file by domain (e.g., Control Environment, Communication, Risk Assessment, etc.) or grouping related controls. This can improve maintainability and clarity without sacrificing the overall structure.
- Field Consistency: Verify that naming conventions in the artifact objects (i.e.,
id,policyId,evidenceId,name, anddescriptionfor training artifacts) are consistent with related files in the codebase to ensure a uniform data contract.Overall, the implementation appears solid and meets the objectives for clarity and standardization.
packages/data/src/policies/data/classification.policy.ts (1)
462-542: Consider expanding the Appendix section with more detailed handling instructionsWhile Appendix A lists the different types of media and formats for classified information, it could benefit from more detailed handling instructions for each classification level and format. This would provide clearer guidance to users on day-to-day implementation.
Consider expanding each bullet point with specific handling instructions by classification level, for example:
- { type: "text", text: "Paper Documents" }, + { type: "text", text: "Paper Documents - For Confidential information: store in locked cabinets, use secure destruction methods, require signed receipt for transfers, etc." },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/data/src/controls/soc2.json(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/classification.policy.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/data/src/policies/data/classification.policy.ts (4)
1-16: Well-structured policy metadata with clear SOC2 mappingsThe policy metadata is well-defined with appropriate fields including id, slug, name, description, review frequency, and department ownership. The explicit mapping to SOC2 controls (CC6.1, CC8.1, CC6.6) provides clear traceability for compliance purposes.
157-350: LGTM: Comprehensive classification levels with clear criteriaThe classification table provides a well-structured framework with four distinct levels (Public, Internal Use, Restricted, and Confidential), each with clear labels, classification criteria, and access restrictions. This follows security best practices for data classification.
357-457: Strong policy rules for handling external informationThe policy appropriately addresses how to handle information received from outside the organization, including provisions for customer data handled as part of business operations. The guidance on determining confidentiality levels based on value, sensitivity, and legal obligations provides a solid framework for classification decisions.
3-544:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify integration with policy rendering components
The policy is structured with a complex nested object containing various content types (headings, tables, paragraphs, lists). Ensure this structure is compatible with the components used to render policies in the UI.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for policy rendering components that will consume this structure grep -r "policy" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.ts" packages/*/src/components/ # Look for similar policy structure patterns to verify consistency find packages/data/src/policies/ -name "*.ts" -not -path "*/classification.policy.ts" | xargs grep -l "type: \"heading\""Length of output: 533
Integration of Classification Policy with UI Components Verified
The classification policy structure in this file is consistent with similar policy files (like access-control, application-security, etc.) and aligns with the patterns rendered by components in both the analytics and UI packages. No discrepancies were found, and the integration appears to be correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
packages/data/package.json (1)
9-14: Build Scripts and Clean Command ReviewThe addition of the
"scripts"section for build (tsupwith dual format support), development (watch mode), linting, and cleaning is a solid improvement. One note: the clean script currently removes thenode_modulesdirectory along with build artifacts. While this may be intentional in some scenarios, it could lead to longer reinstall times during development. Consider whether this aggressive cleanup is necessary or if limiting the cleanup to build-related artifacts (e.g.,rm -rf .turbo && rm -rf dist) might be more appropriate.packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md (1)
41-41: Fix typo in instructions.There's a typo in the last line of instructions.
-Do not add more entried to this file, only check these existing entries. If in doubt scan the directory /policies/data to see what JSONS actually exist. +Do not add more entries to this file, only check these existing entries. If in doubt, scan the directory /policies/data to see what JSONs actually exist.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...nly check these existing entries. If in doubt scan the directory /policies/data to se...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
57-58: Consider implementing the commented-out Policies typeThere's a commented-out type definition for a potential
Policiestype. If you plan to have a centralized collection of all policies, consider implementing this type to provide better structure and type safety.-// Optional: If you plan to have a map of all policies similar to frameworks.ts -// export type Policies = Record<string, Policy>; +/** + * Map of all policies keyed by their ID. + */ +export type Policies = Record<string, Policy>; + +/** + * Function to retrieve a policy by its ID. + */ +export function getPolicy(id: string): Policy | undefined { + // Implementation would go here +}packages/data/src/policies/data/data-center.policy.ts (2)
7-8: Consider consistency in slug namingThere's an inconsistency in the slug naming pattern:
metadata.idis "data_center" (with underscore)metadata.slugis "data-center" (with hyphen)This differs from other policies where the slug usually includes "-policy" suffix (e.g., "corporate-governance-policy", "data-classification-policy").
- slug: "data-center", + slug: "data-center-policy",
21-21: Small inconsistency in heading vs. metadata namingThe main heading uses "Datacenter Policy" while the metadata name is "Data Center Policy". Consider making these consistent for better clarity.
- content: [{ type: "text", text: "Datacenter Policy" }], + content: [{ type: "text", text: "Data Center Policy" }],packages/data/src/videos/trainingVideos.ts (1)
9-45: Improved type safety with readonly array and const assertion.The use of
readonly TrainingVideo[]combined withas constensures that the training videos array and its contents cannot be accidentally modified, which is a good practice for reference data.However, I noticed that the description field for each video contains the same text as the title. Consider adding more descriptive content to improve the user experience.
{ id: "sat-1", title: "Security Awareness Training - Part 1", - description: "Security Awareness Training - Part 1", + description: "An introduction to basic security awareness concepts and best practices.", youtubeId: "N-sBS3uCWB4", url: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-sBS3uCWB4", },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
bun.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
packages/data/package.json(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/code-of-conduct.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/confidentiality.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/corporate-governance.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/cyber-risk.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/data-center.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/data-classification.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/disaster_recovery.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/human_resources.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/incident_response.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/videos/trainingVideos.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (11)
packages/data/src/policies/data/disaster_recovery.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
packages/data/src/policies/data/corporate-governance.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
packages/data/src/policies/data/code-of-conduct.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
packages/data/src/policies/data/human_resources.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
packages/data/src/policies/data/incident_response.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
packages/data/src/frameworks/frameworks.types.ts (1)
Frameworks(7-11)
packages/data/src/policies/data/data-classification.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
packages/data/src/policies/data/confidentiality.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
packages/data/src/policies/data/cyber-risk.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
packages/data/src/videos/trainingVideos.ts (2)
apps/portal/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(home)/types.ts (1)
TrainingVideo(1-7)apps/portal/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(home)/data/videos.ts (1)
trainingVideos(41-41)
packages/data/src/policies/data/data-center.policy.ts (1)
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (1)
Policy(42-55)
🪛 LanguageTool
packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...nly check these existing entries. If in doubt scan the directory /policies/data to se...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (24)
packages/data/package.json (3)
2-4: Meta Fields VerificationThe meta fields for the package—
name,version, andprivate—are correctly defined and follow best practices for internal packages.
5-8: Enhanced Distribution CompatibilityThe entries for
"main","module","types", and"files"ensure that consumers get the correct compiled output, ESM support, and TypeScript type definitions. This change markedly improves the package's usability and distribution.
15-19: DevDependencies ConfigurationThe newly added
"devDependencies"section, with a workspace dependency on@bubba/dband pinned versions fortsupandtypescript, appears to be well-configured for a consistent development and build environment.packages/data/src/policies/data/human_resources.policy.ts (1)
1-156: Well-structured policy implementation.The human resources policy is well-organized and follows the expected Policy interface structure. The implementation provides a comprehensive framework for human resource management that aligns with SOC2 compliance requirements CC1.3 and CC1.4.
packages/data/src/policies/data/disaster_recovery.policy.ts (1)
1-187: Comprehensive disaster recovery policy implementation.The disaster recovery policy is well-structured and provides thorough coverage of disaster recovery requirements. The policy appropriately references other related policies (Business Continuity Policy) and covers critical aspects like RTOs, RPOs, testing, and employee training.
packages/data/src/policies/data/confidentiality.policy.ts (1)
1-351: Thorough confidentiality policy implementation.The confidentiality policy provides comprehensive coverage of confidentiality requirements including information handling, NDAs, access control measures, and incident reporting procedures. The policy structure follows the expected interface and clearly documents responsibilities for maintaining confidentiality of sensitive data.
packages/data/src/policies/data/incident_response.policy.ts (3)
1-156: Well-structured policy implementationThe incident response policy is well-implemented following the Policy interface structure. The policy clearly defines the framework for detecting, responding to, and recovering from security incidents with appropriate metadata and well-organized content sections.
5-16: Good use of metadata for compliance trackingThe metadata section effectively utilizes the SOC2 compliance references (CC7.2, CC7.4, CC7.5) which allows for traceability between the policy and compliance requirements.
59-78:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Template placeholders need runtime replacement
The policy contains placeholders like
{{organization}}and{{date}}that will need to be replaced with actual values at runtime. Ensure there's a mechanism in place to populate these values when the policy is displayed to users.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for placeholder replacement implementation in the codebase echo "Searching for code that handles placeholder replacement in policies..." rg -A 5 "{{organization}}" --type=typescript --type=javascript | grep -v "policies/data" rg -A 5 "{{date}}" --type=typescript --type=javascript | grep -v "policies/data"Length of output: 496
Action Required: Confirm Runtime Replacement for Policy Placeholders
The policy file still contains unpopulated template placeholders (e.g.,
{{organization}}and{{date}}). Our initial attempt to locate any placeholder replacement logic using regex searches encountered parsing errors (likely due to unescaped curly braces), and no valid matches were identified outside the policies directory. Please verify manually that a reliable runtime mechanism exists to replace these placeholders with actual values before the policy is rendered to users. If no such mechanism is in place, it will be necessary to implement one.
- Files to Review:
packages/data/src/policies/data/incident_response.policy.ts(lines 59–78)packages/data/src/policies/data/code-of-conduct.policy.ts (3)
1-364: Comprehensive code of conduct policyThe code of conduct policy is well-structured and covers essential workplace behavior guidelines. The implementation correctly follows the Policy interface with appropriate metadata and content organization.
13-15: SOC2 compliance referencesGood implementation of SOC2 compliance references (CC1.1, CC6.1) in the metadata, which supports compliance tracking and mapping.
323-344: Well-defined disciplinary actions sectionThe policy includes a clearly structured section on disciplinary actions with both ordered and bullet lists, which effectively communicates the consequences of policy violations.
packages/data/src/policies/policies.types.ts (3)
1-55: Well-designed type system for policiesThe type definitions are well-structured with appropriate JSDoc comments that clearly explain each interface's purpose. The Policy interface provides a strong foundation for all policy implementations.
8-19: Flexible JSONContent type implementationThe JSONContent type is appropriately flexible with optional properties, which allows it to accommodate various content structures in the policy documents. This aligns well with ProseMirror/TipTap document structure requirements.
36-36: Strong typing for framework referencesGood use of TypeScript's type system to ensure that framework references in the
usedByproperty are limited to valid framework keys, usingPartial<Record<keyof Frameworks, string[]>>.packages/data/src/policies/data/cyber-risk.policy.ts (3)
1-326: Comprehensive cyber risk assessment policyThe cyber risk assessment policy is well-implemented following the Policy interface structure. It clearly defines the process for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating cybersecurity threats with appropriate sections and structure.
13-15: Multiple SOC2 compliance referencesExcellent implementation of multiple SOC2 compliance references (CC1.1 through CC1.5) which allows for comprehensive compliance mapping and traceability.
59-80: Consistent use of template placeholdersThe policy maintains consistency with other policies by using the same placeholder format (
{{organization}}and{{date}}). This consistency will simplify the implementation of placeholder replacement functionality.packages/data/src/policies/data/corporate-governance.policy.ts (1)
1-239: Implementation looks clean and matches Policy interfaceThe corporate governance policy is well-structured with appropriate metadata and content. The policy follows the expected structure defined in the
Policyinterface, with proper typing for all fields.This implementation supports the PR's objective of removing unused models from Prisma schema files by moving policy data to TypeScript files rather than storing it in database models.
packages/data/src/policies/data/data-classification.policy.ts (2)
14-14: Double-check the SOC2 control referencesThe SOC2 control references (
"C1.1", "C1.2", "C1.3") don't follow the same format as in the corporate-governance policy which uses"CC1.1"format. Verify if these are correct or if they should be prefixed with "CC".
1-156: Implementation is well-structured and follows Policy interfaceThe data classification policy is well-implemented with appropriate metadata and content sections. This static TypeScript implementation supports the PR's goal of removing unused models from Prisma schema by defining policies in code rather than database tables.
packages/data/src/policies/data/data-center.policy.ts (1)
1-367: Comprehensive implementation following Policy interfaceThe data center policy is properly structured with detailed sections for security requirements, environmental controls, access management, and disaster recovery. The implementation aligns with the Policy interface and supports the PR's goal of removing database models in favor of TypeScript definitions.
packages/data/src/videos/trainingVideos.ts (2)
1-7: Good addition of a type definition for training videos.Adding the
TrainingVideointerface improves type safety and provides clear documentation of the expected data structure. This matches the interface already defined inapps/portal/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(home)/types.ts, ensuring consistency across the codebase.
9-45:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify if the training videos are imported correctly in the portal application.
The export structure has changed to a typed constant. Make sure that the import in
apps/portal/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(home)/data/videos.tsis updated to use this new structure if needed.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check how trainingVideos is imported and used in the portal app rg -A 2 -B 2 "trainingVideos" --type ts apps/portal/src/appLength of output: 4138
Action: Verify Training Videos Import Consistency
The data package now exports
trainingVideosas a readonly, typed constant. However, the portal’s data module (apps/portal/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(home)/data/videos.ts) currently reassignstrainingVideosby spreadingsecurityVideosinto a mutable array. Please:
- Confirm whether this conversion from the immutable constant to a mutable array is intentional.
- If not, update the portal’s import to directly consume the new
trainingVideosconstant from the data package.- Verify that downstream components (e.g., in
EmployeeTasksList.tsxandOverview.tsx) handle the updated structure appropriately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/data/src/policies/data/privacy.policy.ts (2)
150-155: References section is emptyThe privacy policy has a "References" heading but no actual references are listed underneath it. This could be an oversight or intentional, but typically a references section would include links to related policies, regulations (like GDPR, CCPA), or standards.
Consider adding relevant references to privacy regulations or related internal policies:
{ type: "heading", attrs: { level: 2 }, content: [{ type: "text", text: "References" }], }, + { + type: "orderedList", + attrs: { tight: true }, + content: [ + { + type: "listItem", + content: [ + { + type: "paragraph", + content: [{ type: "text", text: "Data Protection Policy" }], + }, + ], + }, + { + type: "listItem", + content: [ + { + type: "paragraph", + content: [{ type: "text", text: "Applicable Privacy Laws and Regulations (GDPR, CCPA, etc.)" }], + }, + ], + } + ], + },
103-149: Consider expanding privacy policy requirementsThe current policy includes just three basic privacy requirements. Given the importance of privacy compliance, consider expanding this section to include more comprehensive requirements covering data subject rights, breach notification, and data retention limits.
Consider adding more privacy requirements like:
}, }, ], }, + { + type: "listItem", + content: [ + { + type: "paragraph", + content: [ + { + type: "text", + text: "Honor data subject rights to access, correct, delete, and export their personal data.", + }, + ], + }, + ], + }, + { + type: "listItem", + content: [ + { + type: "paragraph", + content: [ + { + type: "text", + text: "Maintain records of processing activities for all personal data.", + }, + ], + }, + ], + }, + { + type: "listItem", + content: [ + { + type: "paragraph", + content: [ + { + type: "text", + text: "Notify relevant authorities and affected individuals of data breaches within required timeframes.", + }, + ], + }, + ], + },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/information-security.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/password-policy.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/privacy.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/risk-assessment.policy.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/data/src/policies/data/risk-assessment.policy.ts (1)
1-259: Well-structured policy with comprehensive contentThe risk assessment policy is well-organized with clearly defined sections, including policy information, purpose and scope, risk assessment process, and risk mitigation strategies. The content is thorough and follows a consistent structure.
packages/data/src/policies/data/information-security.policy.ts (1)
1-171: Well-structured information security policyThe information security policy provides a solid foundation with essential security requirements and references to related policies. The structure and content follow the established pattern and maintain consistency with other policy files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md (1)
41-41: Typographical and Grammar Suggestions.
There is a typo in "entried" (should be "entries") and the sentence could benefit from improved punctuation and clarity. Consider revising it to:
"Do not add more entries to this file; only check these existing entries. If in doubt, scan the directory/policies/datato see which JSON files actually exist."🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...nly check these existing entries. If in doubt scan the directory /policies/data to se...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
packages/data/src/policies/data/software-development.policy.ts (1)
97-142: Consider adding deployment and maintenance phases to SDLCThe current SDLC policy covers planning, design, development, and testing phases but might benefit from adding sections on deployment/release management and ongoing maintenance/operations.
Standard SDLC typically includes:
- Deployment procedures (including approvals and rollback plans)
- Post-deployment monitoring
- Maintenance and patching processes
- Decommissioning procedures
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/risk-management.policy.ts(1 hunks)packages/data/src/policies/data/software-development.policy.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...nly check these existing entries. If in doubt scan the directory /policies/data to se...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/data/src/policies/POLICY_REFACTOR_TRACKING.md (3)
1-3: Approve File Header and Overview.
The document title and introductory section clearly explain the purpose and intent of the refactor tracking process.
5-12: Clear Explanation of the Conversion Process.
The step-by-step process for converting.jsonfiles to.tsfiles is well-documented, ensuring that contributors can easily follow the procedure.
13-40: Checklist Section is Comprehensive.
The checklist enumerates all the relevant policy JSON files and tracks their conversion status effectively. This section aids in verifying progress and ensuring consistency.packages/data/src/policies/data/risk-management.policy.ts (1)
1-171: Well-structured policy implementation with good organizationThe risk management policy is well-defined with appropriate metadata and structured content. The policy aligns with SOC2 requirements (CC3.1, CC3.2, CC3.3, CC4.2) and follows a clear format with headings, tables, and ordered lists.
A few observations:
- The policy includes placeholders like {{organization}} and {{date}} that will need to be replaced at runtime
- The policy follows a logical structure with sections for policy information, purpose and scope, actual policy points, and references
- The policy content is comprehensive yet concise, covering essential risk management processes
packages/data/src/policies/data/software-development.policy.ts (1)
1-253: Comprehensive SDLC policy with appropriate SOC2 controlsThe software development lifecycle policy is well-structured and covers key phases of software development. The policy correctly references relevant SOC2 controls (CC6.2, CC7.1, CC7.2, CC8.1) and follows a similar format to the risk management policy.
The policy effectively outlines requirements for:
- Planning & Requirements (including risk assessments)
- Design & Architecture (incorporating security principles)
- Development & Implementation (secure coding practices)
- Testing & Validation (security, functional, and performance testing)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
biome.json (1)
32-33: Indentation Configuration – Tab with Custom Width:
The formatter now sets"indentStyle": "tab"alongside an"indentWidth": 2. While using tabs is perfectly valid, the specified indent width may affect how tabs are rendered in different environments. Confirm that all team members’ editors and build tools are configured to display tab widths consistently as intended.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
packages/data/dist/index.d.mtsis excluded by!**/dist/**packages/data/dist/index.d.tsis excluded by!**/dist/**packages/data/dist/index.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**packages/data/dist/index.mjsis excluded by!**/dist/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
biome.json(1 hunks)packages/data/src/index.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/data/src/index.ts (2)
3-3: Expansion of public API with frameworks module.This new export makes all entities from the frameworks module publicly available, including structured information about various compliance frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR. This is a useful addition that aligns with the overall refactoring objective.
5-5: Expansion of public API with policies module.This export makes all policy-related constants (such as accessControlPolicy, applicationSecurityPolicy, etc.) publicly available from the data package. This enhancement supports the schema cleanup by providing direct access to structured policy data rather than requiring database queries.
biome.json (2)
2-5: Schema & Organize Imports Configuration:
The schema version is explicitly set to"https://biomejs.dev/schemas/1.9.4/schema.json", which is useful for ensuring validation consistency. The"organizeImports"option is clearly disabled as per project requirements.
18-21: Linter 'style' Rules – Disabled 'useImportType':
The"useImportType": "off"rule in the linter’s style section is now explicitly disabled. This change is acceptable if your project relies on patterns that would otherwise conflict with stricter import type checking. Just ensure that this aligns with your team’s coding conventions and downstream type safety requirements.
…claudio/db-refactor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/page.tsx (1)
124-130:⚠️ Potential issueAdd
organizationIdcheck in the training videos query.The query currently filters only by
memberId: employeeId. Enforce strict tenant isolation by including a matchingorganizationId.Apply a fix similar to:
const employeeTrainingVideos = await db.employeeTrainingVideoCompletion.findMany({ where: { memberId: employeeId, + organizationId: organizationId, }, orderBy: { videoId: "asc", }, });
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table-action-bar.tsx (2)
38-44: Consider adding an aria-label to the buttonWhile the button has a tooltip, it would be better to also include an aria-label for screen readers, especially since it only contains an icon.
<Button variant="ghost" size="icon" className="size-5 [&>svg]:size-3.5" + aria-label="Clear selection" onClick={() => table.toggleAllRowsSelected(false)} > <X /> </Button>
41-42: Keyboard shortcut handler is missingThe UI shows an Esc keyboard shortcut hint, but there's no keyboard event handler to implement this functionality. Consider adding a keyboard event listener to support the Esc key for clearing selection.
"use client"; import type { Table } from "@tanstack/react-table"; import { X } from "lucide-react"; + import { useEffect } from "react"; import { DataTableActionBar, } from "@/components/data-table/data-table-action-bar"; import { Button } from "@bubba/ui/button"; import { Separator } from "@bubba/ui/separator"; import { Tooltip, TooltipContent, TooltipTrigger, } from "@bubba/ui/tooltip"; import { Policy } from "@bubba/db/types"; interface PoliciesTableActionBarProps { table: Table<Policy>; } export function PoliciesTableActionBar({ table }: PoliciesTableActionBarProps) { const rows = table.getFilteredSelectedRowModel().rows; + useEffect(() => { + const handleKeyDown = (e: KeyboardEvent) => { + if (e.key === "Escape" && rows.length > 0) { + table.toggleAllRowsSelected(false); + } + }; + + document.addEventListener("keydown", handleKeyDown); + return () => document.removeEventListener("keydown", handleKeyDown); + }, [table, rows.length]); return ( <DataTableActionBar table={table} visible={rows.length > 0}>apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/data/queries.ts (1)
48-49: Consider returning or surfacing the error information.
Currently, returning{ data: [], pageCount: 0 }for all errors might mask issues. If feasible, log or rethrow the error so it is easier to diagnose failures.} catch (_err) { - return { data: [], pageCount: 0 }; + // Log or rethrow error details for easier debugging + console.error("getPolicies error:", _err); + return { data: [], pageCount: 0 }; }apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table-columns.tsx (1)
31-49: Display or format thestatus.
The straightforward text rendering is fine. Consider color-coding or a badge component for a better user experience if distinct statuses exist.-<p className="text-sm font-medium"> - {row.getValue("status")} -</p> +<span + className={`font-medium ${ + row.getValue("status") === "ACTIVE" ? "text-green-600" : "text-gray-700" + }`} +> + {row.getValue("status")} +</span>apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/page.tsx (1)
28-33: Avoid lumping multiple async calls in onePromise.allif not truly parallel.
Collecting all tasks in a single array can be beneficial for parallel execution, but ensure you need them in parallel. If any dependencies exist, consider sequential calls or separate promise handling.apps/app/package.json (1)
59-65: UI animation library duplicationThe package includes both
framer-motionandmotionat the same version (^12.6.3). This appears to be a duplication sincemotionis typically just an alias or re-export fromframer-motion.- "motion": "^12.6.3",Having both packages increases bundle size unnecessarily. Consider removing one of them, preferably keeping
framer-motionas it's the canonical package name.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/hooks/useEmployees.ts (1)
40-52: Consider validating the shape ofrawDatamore robustly.Currently, the code checks if
rawDataexists and assumesrawData.employeesis an array andrawData.totalis defined. Consider adding fallback logic or type checks for these fields to guard against unexpected data shapes.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/columns.tsx (1)
15-21: Remove or gate the console log.There's a console.log in line 21 that might not be needed in production. Consider removing it or wrapping it with a debug flag if it's only meant for development.
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/page.tsx (1)
132-132: Remove the console.log statement.Leaking data through console.log in production might be undesirable. Consider removing or restricting it to a debug mode only.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
apps/app/package.json(1 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeesOverview.tsx(1 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/components/EmployeeDetails.tsx(7 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/page.tsx(3 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/actions/get-employees.ts(2 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/EmployeesTable.tsx(2 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/columns.tsx(1 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/hooks/useEmployeesTableContext.tsx(2 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/hooks/useEmployees.ts(3 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/types/index.ts(2 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/actions/get-policies.ts(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/PoliciesList.tsx(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/PoliciesListSkeleton.tsx(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table-action-bar.tsx(1 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table-columns.tsx(1 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table.tsx(1 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/PoliciesTable.tsx(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/columns.tsx(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/components/filterCategories.tsx(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/components/filterConfigs.tsx(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/hooks/usePoliciesTableContext.tsx(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/types.ts(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/utils.ts(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/data/queries.ts(1 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/hooks/usePolicies.ts(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/hooks/usePoliciesTableContext.tsx(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/hooks/usePolicy.ts(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/types/index.ts(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/types/search-params.ts(0 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/tests/all/layout.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (15)
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/utils.ts
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/components/filterConfigs.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/types/search-params.ts
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/PoliciesList.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/actions/get-policies.ts
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/PoliciesListSkeleton.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/columns.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/hooks/usePoliciesTableContext.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/PoliciesTable.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/components/filterCategories.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/hooks/usePoliciesTableContext.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/table/types.ts
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/types/index.ts
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/hooks/usePolicy.ts
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/hooks/usePolicies.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/tests/all/layout.tsx
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/actions/get-employees.ts
- apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeesOverview.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (8)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/hooks/useEmployeesTableContext.tsx (1)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/columns.tsx (1)
EmployeeWithUser(13-13)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/EmployeesTable.tsx (1)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/columns.tsx (1)
employeesColumns(15-63)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/hooks/useEmployees.ts (1)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/columns.tsx (1)
EmployeeWithUser(13-13)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table-columns.tsx (1)
apps/app/src/components/data-table/data-table-column-header.tsx (1)
DataTableColumnHeader(27-107)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/page.tsx (2)
packages/auth/src/auth.ts (1)
auth(11-75)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/components/EmployeeDetails.tsx (1)
EmployeeDetails(65-382)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table.tsx (6)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/data/queries.ts (1)
getPolicies(11-52)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table-columns.tsx (1)
getPolicyColumns(7-51)apps/app/src/hooks/use-data-table.ts (1)
useDataTable(67-296)apps/app/src/components/data-table/data-table.tsx (1)
DataTable(21-101)apps/app/src/components/data-table/data-table-toolbar.tsx (1)
DataTableToolbar(19-69)apps/app/src/components/data-table/data-table-sort-list.tsx (1)
DataTableSortList(52-262)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/data/queries.ts (1)
apps/app/src/lib/validations.ts (1)
GetPolicySchema(34-36)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/components/EmployeeDetails.tsx (2)
packages/auth/src/auth.ts (1)
Member(79-79)packages/auth/src/index.ts (1)
Member(7-7)
🔇 Additional comments (33)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/hooks/useEmployeesTableContext.tsx (4)
3-5: Good improvement to imports for better type safety.Adding the import for
Memberfrom@bubba/db/typesand reorganizing imports shows a commitment to better organization and type safety. This aligns with the PR's refactoring goals.
8-11: Improved React import organization.The inclusion of
useEffectin the imports list and repositioning ofuseStatehelps maintain consistent import organization, making the code more maintainable.
15-15: Enhanced type specificity for employees.Importing the specific
EmployeeWithUsertype from the columns file rather than using a generic type improves type safety and code readability.
27-27: Excellent type safety improvement.Changing
employeesfrom what appears to have beenany[]to the more specificEmployeeWithUser[]significantly improves type safety. This prevents potential runtime errors by enforcing the expected structure at compile time.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table-action-bar.tsx (4)
1-21: Well-structured component interface with proper imports and typingsThe component is properly set up with clear typing using TypeScript interfaces. The imports are organized logically, with external libraries first followed by internal components. The use of the Policy type from @bubba/db/types ensures type safety when working with the table data.
22-24: Clean implementation of row selection handlingThe component efficiently uses the table's
getFilteredSelectedRowModel()method to retrieve only the filtered selected rows, which is the correct approach for displaying accurate selection information to users.
25-34: Good conditional rendering and accessible UI elementsThe component only shows the action bar when rows are selected (
visible={rows.length > 0}), which is a good UX practice. The selected count is clearly displayed, and the use of the Separator creates visual distinction between the count and action buttons.
35-55: Excellent accessibility considerations with keyboard shortcutsThe clear selection button is properly wrapped in a Tooltip that includes both a text description and keyboard shortcut information. The use of semantic HTML elements like
<kbd>and<abbr>enhances accessibility.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/data/queries.ts (4)
17-19: Rethink error handling for absent organization.
Throwing an error here is acceptable, but ensure upstream error boundaries or calling code can properly handle the error scenario.
21-23: Great usage of dynamic sorting.
Theinput.sortmapping to an array oforderByobjects is a clean approach.
25-33: Efficient filtering byname.
UsingcontainswithQueryMode.insensitiveis helpful for case-insensitive searches. No further concerns.
5-5:Details
✅ Verification successful
Use consistent import references.
Double-check thatGetPolicySchemais correctly exported from"@/lib/validations". If this path was recently moved or renamed, ensure it remains valid.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verifying that GetPolicySchema is exported from the validations file rg --context 5 "export.*GetPolicySchema"Length of output: 2028
Verified Correct Export of GetPolicySchema
The verification confirms that
GetPolicySchemais correctly exported from@/lib/validationsas intended. The import inapps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/data/queries.tsis consistent with the export inapps/app/src/lib/validations.ts.No changes are required.
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table-columns.tsx (2)
1-2: Confirm necessity of"use client".
Since this file includes React components and possibly interactions that require client-side rendering,"use client"is correct. No change needed.
7-30: Column definitions look solid.
The first column definition, including the filter config and header renderer, appears correct. Good job leveraging the built-in features ofreact-table.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/page.tsx (4)
4-10: Imports nicely consolidated.
ImportingDataTableSkeleton,PoliciesTable, andgetPoliciesin one place is a clean design.
12-15: Input types are well-defined.
ThePolicyTablePropsinterface clarifies how the route component is invoked, which helps maintain type safety.
36-55: Effective loading fallback.
Providing theDataTableSkeletonfallback ensures a better user experience during data fetch.
59-72: Clear metadata generation for SEO/UX.
Generating localized metadata (title) is a best practice for SEO. Implementation looks good.apps/app/package.json (1)
17-23: Added AI capabilities with GROQThe addition of
@ai-sdk/groqalongside updates to existing OpenAI and provider packages suggests a multi-LLM approach. This is a positive enhancement that provides more flexibility in AI provider selection.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/components/policies-table.tsx (3)
27-32: Good table configuration with appropriate defaultsThe initial state configuration for the data table with sorting by
createdAtin descending order and pinning the actions column to the right follows good UX practices. Users will see the most recent policies first, and actions are always accessible.
36-46:Details
✅ Verification successful
Consider extending DataTable with table pagination controls
The component renders a DataTable but doesn't explicitly include pagination controls in this implementation, despite the
pageCountbeing passed from the fetched data to theuseDataTablehook.Verify if pagination is handled internally by the DataTable component:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if DataTable handles pagination internally cat apps/app/src/components/data-table/data-table.tsx | grep -A 20 "DataTablePagination" || echo "DataTablePagination not found in DataTable component"Length of output: 748
Pagination is handled by DataTable internally.
The verification confirmed that the DataTable component already renders pagination controls via the
<DataTablePagination table={table} />element (found inapps/app/src/components/data-table/data-table.tsx). Therefore, there’s no need to modify the code to add external pagination controls.
18-20:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Consider adding error handling for the Promise
The component directly uses
React.use(promises)to unwrap the Promise result without any explicit error handling. If the Promise rejects, it will bubble up to the nearest error boundary.Consider adding a try-catch block or implementing an error boundary to gracefully handle potential failures in the data fetching process:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are error boundaries in parent components rg -A 3 -B 3 "ErrorBoundary|error boundary|React\.Component.*componentDidCatch" apps/app/src/app/Length of output: 99
Action Required: Enhance Error Handling for Promise Unwrapping
The current implementation of
PoliciesTabledirectly unwraps the promise usingReact.use(promises)without any clear mechanism to handle rejections. Our initial search for error boundaries in the app (using the providedrgcommand) returned no results, implying that there isn’t an explicit error handling wrapper in the parent components.
- Verify whether the component is rendered within a global or higher-level error boundary that can catch rejected promises. If not, consider adding:
- An error boundary around this component (or higher in the component tree).
- Or an inline error handling mechanism (e.g., wrapping the promise resolution with a try-catch-like mechanism, if applicable) to gracefully manage failures.
Please manually verify the presence (or absence) of appropriate error boundaries in the broader app context to ensure robust error handling during data fetching.
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/EmployeesTable.tsx (2)
8-8: Improved import for static columns configurationThe change to import
employeesColumnsdirectly indicates a shift from dynamic column generation to a more maintainable, static approach.
50-50:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Column configuration no longer receives click handler
The column configuration now uses a static import without passing the
handleRowClickfunction. This suggests that either:
- Row click handling is now done differently, or
- The function is no longer needed in the column definitions
Check if the
onRowClickhandler is properly wired up without requiring it in the column definitions:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check how the employeesColumns are defined cat apps/app/src/app/[locale]/\(app\)/\(dashboard\)/\[orgId\]/employees/all/components/table/columns.tsx | grep -A 5 "cell: ({ row })" || echo "No cell render function found in columns"Length of output: 662
Action: Verify Row Click Handling Implementation
The static
employeesColumnsincolumns.tsxno longer includes thehandleRowClickcallback. Please confirm whether row click events are now handled elsewhere—such as at the row level withinEmployeesTable.tsxor via the table component’s own event wiring—or if this change is intentional because row clicks are no longer needed. Clarifying the updated approach will help ensure that the intended user interactions remain intact.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/types/index.ts (3)
2-2: Improved type imports with DB packageThe change to import types directly from
@bubba/db/typesis a good practice. It ensures type consistency with the database schema and reduces duplicate type definitions.
21-24: Enhanced employee data model with joined User informationThe refactored type for
employeesinEmployeesResponsenow combinesMemberwith its relateduserdata. This change:
- Makes the relationship between members and users explicit
- Aligns with a likely database schema change (from Prisma)
- Provides more comprehensive data to the UI
This is a good change that should enable more robust employee data handling.
18-18:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Potential type inconsistency with Employee definition
The
Employeetype is still defined asz.infer<typeof employeeSchema>, but it's no longer being used inEmployeesResponse. This could lead to confusion for developers, as the schema validation expects one shape, but the actual data has a different shape.Consider whether
Employeetype andemployeeSchemashould be updated to match the new data structure, or if they're still needed:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usages of the Employee type rg -l "Employee(?!\w)" --type=typescript apps/app/src/app/Length of output: 286
Action: Verify and reconcile the usage of the
EmployeetypeThe
Employeetype is still defined asz.infer<typeof employeeSchema>in
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/types/index.ts(line 18). However, its usage in the code—especially in relation to theEmployeesResponse—appears to be inconsistent with the current data structure.Next Steps:
- Re-verify usages: The initial regex search using a look-ahead produced a PCRE error. Please re-run the following command to check for any usage of
Employeeacross the codebase with PCRE2 enabled:rg -l --pcre2 "Employee(?!\\w)" --type=typescript apps/app/src/app/- Action Based on Results:
- If no usages are found: Consider removing or updating both the
Employeetype and theemployeeSchemadefinition to avoid confusion regarding the expected data shape.- If usages are found: Ensure that the
Employeetype (and, by extension,employeeSchema) correctly reflects the new data structure used inEmployeesResponse.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/hooks/useEmployees.ts (3)
10-16: All type imports look correct.The added type imports, including
EmployeeWithUser, appear consistent with the rest of the code and serve to keep the hook strongly typed. No issues found.
123-123: Validate casted data.Casting
data?.employeestoEmployeeWithUser[]might hide potential data-shape mismatches at runtime. Consider verifying thatdata?.employeesis actually of typeEmployeeWithUser[]before casting or use a user-defined type guard if strict runtime safety is required.
126-126: RevealingisMutatingis a good addition.Exposing
isMutatinghelps manage loading states in the UI effectively. No issues found.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/columns.tsx (1)
7-13: Type definition is consistent.Defining
EmployeeWithUserby extendingMemberwithuser: Useris clear and aligns with the usage throughout the table. No further issues.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/components/EmployeeDetails.tsx (2)
54-61: Props interface changes enhance clarity.Using a single
employeeprop of typeMember & { user: User }plus the separate arrays forpoliciesandtrainingVideosis a neat, readable approach.
313-313: ConfirmsignedByis always an array.The code calls
policy.signedBy.includes(employee.id). IfsignedBycan be null or undefined, this might throw an error. Verify that this field is always an array or use optional chaining.
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/policies/all/(overview)/data/queries.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/all/components/table/EmployeesTable.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/[employeeId]/page.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…s to include training video data, improving task completion tracking and user experience
…lization and add localization for completed and not completed tasks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeeCompletionChart.tsx (3)
67-91: Optimize calculation of unique training videos.The calculation of unique training video IDs is performed for each employee, but it's the same for all employees. This could be moved outside the mapping function for better performance.
export function EmployeeCompletionChart({ employees, policies, trainingVideos, }: EmployeeCompletionChartProps) { const t = useI18n(); + // Calculate unique training videos once + const uniqueTrainingVideosIds = React.useMemo(() => [ + ...new Set(trainingVideos.map((video) => video.metadata.id)), + ], [trainingVideos]); + + const trainingVideosTotal = uniqueTrainingVideosIds.length; // Calculate completion data for each employee const employeeStats: EmployeeTaskStats[] = React.useMemo(() => { return employees.map((employee) => { // Count policies completed by this employee const policiesCompletedCount = policies.filter((policy) => policy.signedBy.includes(employee.id), ).length; // Calculate policy completion percentage const policyCompletionPercentage = policies.length ? Math.round((policiesCompletedCount / policies.length) * 100) : 0; // Count training videos completed by this employee const employeeTrainingVideos = trainingVideos.filter( (video) => video.memberId === employee.id && video.completedAt !== null, ); const trainingsCompletedCount = employeeTrainingVideos.length; - // Get the total unique training videos available - const uniqueTrainingVideosIds = [ - ...new Set(trainingVideos.map((video) => video.metadata.id)), - ]; - const trainingVideosTotal = uniqueTrainingVideosIds.length; - // Calculate training completion percentage const trainingCompletionPercentage = trainingVideosTotal ? Math.round((trainingsCompletedCount / trainingVideosTotal) * 100) : 0;
145-148: Consider adding pagination or indication of limited results.The chart now only displays the top 5 employees sorted by completion percentage. If there are more than 5 employees, it might be helpful to add a note indicating that only the top performers are shown, or provide a way to see all employees.
// Sort by completion percentage and limit to top 5 const sortedStats = [...employeeStats] .sort((a, b) => b.overallPercentage - a.overallPercentage) .slice(0, 5); + // Determine if we're showing a subset of employees + const showingSubset = employeeStats.length > 5; return ( <Card> <CardHeader> <CardTitle>{t("people.dashboard.employee_task_completion")}</CardTitle> + {showingSubset && ( + <p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> + {t("people.dashboard.showing_top_performers", { count: 5 })} + </p> + )} </CardHeader>
128-129: Inconsistent empty check.The empty check for training videos uses
!trainingVideos.lengthwhile other empty checks in the codebase use the formtrainingVideos.length === 0. Consider standardizing the empty check pattern for consistency.// Check if there are any tasks to complete - if (policies.length === 0 && !trainingVideos.length) { + if (policies.length === 0 && trainingVideos.length === 0) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeeCompletionChart.tsx(4 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeesOverview.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeesOverview.tsx (5)
1-7: Import organization looks good.The imports are well-organized, with clear separation of concerns. Moving to the auth mechanism from a dedicated package improves modularity.
26-48: Good refactoring of the employee retrieval logic.The refactored
getEmployeesfunction properly uses session-based organization identification and directly queries the member table. This is a cleaner approach than the previous implementation and aligns with the PR's objective to remove unused models.
50-69: Simplified policy retrieval implementation.The updated implementation now directly queries the
policytable instead of using theorganizationPolicymodel, which aligns with the PR's goal of removing unused models.
12-13: Clean integration of the training videos functionality.The component now properly integrates the training videos functionality with the updated data retrieval mechanism, providing a comprehensive view of employee task completion.
71-110:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Well-structured training video retrieval function.
The new
getTrainingVideosfunction properly replaces the previous implementation with a more efficient approach that:
- Fetches training videos for specific employees
- Enriches the data with metadata from the static dataset
Note that videos without matching metadata in
trainingVideosDataare filtered out. This appears intentional but could potentially hide data if metadata definitions are incomplete.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if there are any training videos without corresponding metadata echo "Checking for videos that might be missing metadata..." rg -A 3 "videoId.*===.*dbVideo\.videoId.*\)" --type typescriptLength of output: 216
Training Video Retrieval Function — Please Verify Missing Metadata Handling
The updated
getTrainingVideosimplementation is well-structured and effectively:
- Retrieves training videos for the specified employees.
- Enriches each video with its corresponding metadata from the static
trainingVideosDatadataset.- Filters out any video entries that do not have matching metadata, which appears to be an intentional design choice.
Action Items:
- Verify Intentional Filtering: Confirm that filtering out videos without matching metadata is expected—even if it risks hiding data when the metadata definitions are incomplete.
- Manual Check Recommendation: The initial verification script returned an error ("unrecognized file type: typescript") due to an inappropriate file type parameter. Please re-run or manually verify using an updated search (e.g., using the file type
tsx) to ensure no training video records are unintentionally excluded.apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeeCompletionChart.tsx (4)
4-15: Type imports have been properly updated.The component now uses the correct type imports from
@bubba/db/typesand@bubba/data, ensuring type safety and consistency across the application.
17-25: Props interface properly updated with correct typing.The
EmployeeCompletionChartPropsinterface now correctly uses the imported types, improving type safety and making the component more maintainable.
33-45: Good addition of a structured interface for task statistics.The new
EmployeeTaskStatsinterface provides a clear structure for employee completion data, making the code more readable and maintainable.
187-247: Well-implemented visualization component.The new
TaskBarChartcomponent provides a clear visual representation of task completion status with appropriate conditional rendering for empty states. The component is well-structured and efficiently implements the bar chart visualization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeesOverview.tsx (6)
37-37: Fetching employees from db.member.Querying
db.member.findManyis straightforward. Consider pagination if the employee list grows large.
51-53: Session retrieval repeated.You’re consistently retrieving the session. This is fine, though consider extracting a helper if it’s repeated heavily.
72-74: Session retrieval repeated again.As mentioned, consider centralizing session retrieval to reduce duplication.
85-91: Filtering completions by employee IDs.The
in: employees.map((employee) => employee.id)condition is efficient for multiple members. Ensure that this list isn’t overly large; consider chunking if so.
93-93: Creating processedVideos array.Consider using
.map()or an object dictionary if large volumes of data are expected, though current approach is fine for moderate data sizes.
95-107: Metadata lookup in a loop.This approach is correct but can be optimized. Building a dictionary of
trainingVideosDatakeyed byidbefore the loop is more efficient than repeatedfindcalls.const metadataLookup = trainingVideosData.reduce((acc, vid) => { acc[vid.id] = vid; return acc; }, {} as Record<string, TrainingVideo>); for (const dbVideo of employeeTrainingVideos) { const videoMetadata = metadataLookup[dbVideo.videoId]; if (videoMetadata) { processedVideos.push({ ...dbVideo, metadata: videoMetadata, }); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeeCompletionChart.tsx(4 hunks)apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeesOverview.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (60)
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeesOverview.tsx (20)
1-2: Imports look good.These imports introduce React's
cacheAPI and theauthmodule. Ensure your React version supports this API.
5-5: Header extraction is consistent.Using
headersfromnext/headersis appropriate here for server-side requests. No issues.
6-6: New Member type import.The type import from
@bubba/db/typesis aligned with your refactoring.
7-7: Importing static training video data.
trainingVideosDatais referenced later for metadata. Looks consistent.
12-13: Fetching training videos.Invoking
getTrainingVideos(employees)is correct given that it expects aMember[].
26-26: Caching getEmployees function.Using React’s
cachefor an async server function can help with repeated data fetching.
27-30: Retrieving session from auth.Passing
headersintoauth.api.getSessionensures session context. Consider catching errors if session retrieval fails, but it might be optional if your environment guarantees a valid session.
31-31: Extracting orgId.Accessing nested properties with
session?.session.activeOrganizationIdis safe.
40-40: Filtering by role.Filtering members by
role: "employee"is clear and concise.
42-43: Including user relation.Including the related
userensures easy access to name/email. Looks fine.
47-48: Returning employees.The function ends cleanly. No concerns.
50-50: Caching getEmployeePolicies function.Reusing
cachefor another async server function is consistent.
55-55: orgId extraction, repeated logic.Same pattern as getEmployees. Works well.
61-61: Fetching policies from db.policy.Querying required policies by
organizationIdis logical.
69-69: Function ends.Nothing special to note.
71-71: New getTrainingVideos function.This function caches data for employee training videos. Good separation of concerns.
75-78: Early return if missing org or no employees.A good safeguard that avoids unnecessary queries.
83-84: Retrieving completed training videos.Querying
employeeTrainingVideoCompletionbymemberId. Straightforward approach.
92-92: Documentation comment.Helpful note. No issues.
109-110: Returning processed videos.The function wrap-up is clean.
apps/app/src/app/[locale]/(app)/(dashboard)/[orgId]/employees/(overview)/components/EmployeeCompletionChart.tsx (40)
4-6: Adding essential UI imports and React.These imports (
Card,React,CSSProperties) are used properly in the component.
9-15: Importing new data & types.
TrainingVideo,EmployeeTrainingVideoCompletion, etc., align with the updated schema.
18-24: Updated component props for employees, policies, and training videos.Reflects the new Member-based approach. The shape looks correct.
27-29: taskColors mapping.Defines color classes for chart segments. Straightforward solution.
33-45: EmployeeTaskStats interface.Defines stats fields for polices & trainings. This clarifies data structure.
47-48: Memoized stats computation.A good approach to avoid redundant calculations.
55-58: Policy completion check.Filtering policies by
signedBy.includes(employee.id)is presumably correct ifsignedByis an array of member IDs.Are we certain that
policy.signedByis always an array ofstringornumber? Please confirm in the schema or code references.
62-65: Policy completion percentage.Dividing by total policies is logical.
68-72: Counting completed training videos.Filtering by
video.completedAt !== nullis a standard approach for “completed” detection.
74-78: Computing total unique training videos.Using a Set on
video.metadata.idensures no duplicates.
80-83: Training completion percentage.Straightforward calculation.
85-91: Overall completion calculation.Combining policy & training completions into a single percent is a clean approach.
95-97: Deriving display name & email.Using
employee.user.name || <fallback>is a neat fallback strategy.
100-104: Storing aggregated data.Everything lines up with the interface.
112-112: Card for empty employees scenario.UI structure is consistent.
118-118: CardContent styling.Centering no-data message is appropriate.
128-128: No tasks scenario.Checking if both
policies.lengthand!trainingVideos.lengthis correct for an empty tasks state.
130-130: Additional card container.Consistent with the rest of the layout.
136-136: CardContent styling repeated.Same styling approach as above.
145-148: Sorting employees & limiting the display.Selecting top 5 by completion percentage is a good UI decision for clarity.
151-151: Main Card container.Final rendering container for the chart.
155-165: Rendering each employee’s stats.Shows name, completed tasks, and total tasks. This is correct.
167-167: TaskBarChart usage.Renders a bar chart for each employee’s completion. Looks good.
169-176: Completed vs. not completed legend.Shows color coding for each status. This is a nice UI detail.
182-182: Ending the CardContent.All good here.
186-186: TaskBarChart component.Introduced as a separate function for modularity.
187-189: Computing completed vs. incomplete items.Combines policies & trainings. Straightforward approach.
192-195: Empty chart case.Displays a small bar placeholder if totalTasks is 0.
197-201: Wrapper div for bar segmentation.Applies dynamic style for bar height.
202-202: Absolute positioning container.Enables overlaying segments.
204-210: Completed segment logic.Renders a segment with a percentage width = “completed / totalTasks.”
212-212: Title for completed items.Contains a helpful hover tooltip.
213-219: Applying the completed color.The
taskColors.completedclass is mapped here.
224-230: Conditional for incomplete segment.Similar logic for the remainder of the bar.
232-232: Shifting position for incomplete items.Left offset is the completed portion, ensuring correct bar stacking.
233-239: Applying the incomplete color.
taskColors.incompleteis used for the uncompleted portion.
244-244: Closing out the overlay div.Layout structure ends properly.
245-245: Closing bar container.No issues.
246-246: End of return.Nothing further here.
247-247: Function ends.All logic checks out.
…date next.js version to 15.2.4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
apps/app/src/actions/organization/lib/utils.ts (5)
47-51: Consider concurrency optimization.The filter operation for
getRelevantControlsis straightforward, but if the controls array scales significantly, you could consider partitioning or parallelizing the filtering if performance becomes a concern. For typical usage, this is fine.
131-151: Wrap control creation in a transaction (optional).Currently, each control is created with an individual
await db.control.create(...)call. If partial creation is undesirable, consider using Prisma transactions orPromise.allto batch inserts for better performance and atomicity.+await db.$transaction(async (tx) => { + for (const control of frameworkControls) { + const createdControl = await tx.control.create({ ... }); + createdControls.push(createdControl); + } +});
240-256: Consider adding unit tests.These functions create policy records based on control requirements, which can be critical to your compliance logic. Adding tests to validate correct policy creation and error handling would help ensure stability.
328-343: Consider adding unit tests for evidence creation.Similar to policy creation, it would be beneficial to add targeted tests that confirm evidence records are created accurately, especially in scenarios where evidence templates are missing.
473-541: Use transactions for artifact creation to maintain atomicity.Currently, artifact creation for policies and evidence is done in multiple loops. If a failure occurs halfway through, the process might produce partial artifacts. Consider using Prisma transactions or
Promise.allto ensure that either all artifacts are created or none.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/app/package.json(1 hunks)apps/app/src/actions/organization/lib/utils.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/app/src/actions/organization/lib/utils.ts (3)
1-10: Ensure consistent error handling for missing imports or data references.The imported objects from
@bubba/dataand@bubba/dbpresumably exist, but if they are undefined or incorrectly referenced, it would cause runtime errors. You might want to confirm that these imports are valid and throw meaningful errors early for missing references.
17-20: No concerns, logic is clear.
28-31: No concerns, logic is clear.apps/app/package.json (1)
17-100: No further concerns in updated dependencies.All listed package updates and additions appear consistent. Ensure any major version bumps are tested thoroughly.
…employees are retrieved
… in FrameworkRequirements and RequirementControls to use composite IDs for requirement mapping
… into claudio/db-refactor
…to streamline database structure
Summary by CodeRabbit
Based on the comprehensive summary of changes, I'll craft concise release notes for end-users:
Release Notes
🚀 New Features
🔧 Improvements
🔒 Security Enhancements
💡 User Experience
🐞 Bug Fixes
🔄 Refactoring