feat: initial fork of bigframes#2
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
Some high-level thoughts: I don't think we need both Block and ArrayValue. The old version of bigframes has ArrayValue wrap an ibis table expression, so I think that's probably the way to go. I do thing some of the "row joiner" logic is going to be necessary, which is why I don't directly wrap a table expression with DataFrame. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Work in progress: trying to simplify to an older version of bigframes where
ArrayValuewraps an ibis table expression but without any of the indexing/ordering complexity.