Quick Access to Deleted Records from the View Header

[n2ojim]

Scope & Context

Users need a quick and intuitive way to access records they have deleted, directly from the view they are currently working on. Navigating to a separate settings page or trash bin is disruptive to the workflow.

Current behavior

Currently, there is no quick link or button on the table view headers to see records that have been soft-deleted for that specific object. Users cannot easily see how many records have been deleted or restore them without complex navigation.

Expected behavior

Next to the total record count at the top of a view (e.g., "120 properties"), there should be a button or link displaying the number of deleted records (e.g., "Deleted (5)").
Clicking this button should immediately filter the current view (or open a specific system view) to show only the soft-deleted records for that object, allowing users to review, restore, or permanently delete them.

Technical inputs

• Modify the View Header component to fetch the count of soft-deleted records for the current object (e.g., query where deletedAt is not null).
• Add a UI element (button/badge) next to the total count displaying "Deleted (count)". Hide it if the count is 0 to reduce clutter.
• On click, update the view's query parameters to show soft-deleted records (e.g., applying a filter deletedAt != null or toggling a showDeleted state in the view context).

[Abiral-2724]

Hi , can you assign the issue to me . I would like to work on this .

[Manibharadwaj]

I'm already working on this issue and have opened PR #21299 which fixes the underlying navigation menu item comparison bug that was causing issues with the favorites feature. The PR is ready for review.

[thomtrp]

I'm already working on this issue and have opened PR #21299 which fixes the underlying navigation menu item comparison bug that was causing issues with the favorites feature. The PR is ready for review.

the PR does not seem related with this feature request

[thomtrp]

Hi @n2ojim, for feature requests like this, please go through discussions first. Thank you!