Fix widget injection order: place relation widgets after FIELDS, Notes after relations #17274
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…et repositioning Co-authored-by: Devessier <29370468+Devessier@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Update usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets function for widget placement
Fix widget injection order: place relation widgets after FIELDS, Notes after relations
Jan 20, 2026
Contributor
|
🚀 Preview Environment Ready! Your preview environment is available at: http://bore.pub:27895 This environment will automatically shut down when the PR is closed or after 5 hours. |
Contributor
Greptile SummaryFixes widget injection order in record page layouts by placing relation widgets directly after the FIELDS widget and repositioning the NOTES widget to appear after all relation widgets. The implementation includes comprehensive test coverage with 6 test cases. Key Changes:
Critical Issue Found:
Confidence Score: 3/5
Important Files Changed
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Hook as usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets
participant Context as LayoutRenderingContext
participant Metadata as useFieldListFieldMetadataItems
participant Inject as injectRelationWidgetsIntoLayout
Hook->>Context: Get targetRecordIdentifier & layoutType
Hook->>Metadata: Get boxedRelationFieldMetadataItems
alt basePageLayout is undefined
Hook-->>Hook: Return undefined
else layoutType is not RECORD_PAGE
Hook-->>Hook: Return unchanged basePageLayout
else Normal flow
Hook->>Inject: Pass layout + relation fields
alt No relation fields
Inject-->>Hook: Return unchanged layout
else Has relation fields
Inject->>Inject: Find first FIELDS widget
alt No FIELDS widget found
Inject->>Inject: Append relation widgets to end
else FIELDS widget found
Inject->>Inject: Find NOTES widget index
Inject->>Inject: Slice widgets: before FIELDS
Inject->>Inject: Slice widgets: after FIELDS (exclude NOTES)
Inject->>Inject: Extract NOTES widget if exists
Inject->>Inject: Build: [before] + [relations] + [NOTES] + [after]
end
Inject-->>Hook: Return modified layout
end
Hook-->>Hook: Return final layout
end
|
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Comment on lines
+89
to
+98
| const widgetsAfterRelation = | ||
| noteWidgetIndex === -1 | ||
| ? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | ||
| : [ | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice( | ||
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | ||
| noteWidgetIndex, | ||
| ), | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1), | ||
| ]; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: Logic bug when noteWidgetIndex < firstFieldsWidgetIndex. If the NOTES widget appears before FIELDS widget, widgetsAfterRelation will incorrectly slice and produce wrong output.
Example: widgets = [NOTES, FIELDS, OTHER]
noteWidgetIndex = 0,firstFieldsWidgetIndex = 1- Line 93-96:
slice(2, 0)returns[], thenslice(1)returns[OTHER] - Result:
widgetsAfterRelation = [OTHER](NOTES is lost)
Suggested change
| const widgetsAfterRelation = | |
| noteWidgetIndex === -1 | |
| ? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | |
| : [ | |
| ...tab.widgets.slice( | |
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | |
| noteWidgetIndex, | |
| ), | |
| ...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1), | |
| ]; | |
| const widgetsAfterRelation = | |
| noteWidgetIndex === -1 || noteWidgetIndex < firstFieldsWidgetIndex | |
| ? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | |
| : [ | |
| ...tab.widgets.slice( | |
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | |
| noteWidgetIndex, | |
| ), | |
| ...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1), | |
| ]; |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts
Line: 89:98
Comment:
**logic:** Logic bug when `noteWidgetIndex < firstFieldsWidgetIndex`. If the NOTES widget appears before FIELDS widget, `widgetsAfterRelation` will incorrectly slice and produce wrong output.
Example: widgets = `[NOTES, FIELDS, OTHER]`
- `noteWidgetIndex = 0`, `firstFieldsWidgetIndex = 1`
- Line 93-96: `slice(2, 0)` returns `[]`, then `slice(1)` returns `[OTHER]`
- Result: `widgetsAfterRelation = [OTHER]` (NOTES is lost)
```suggestion
const widgetsAfterRelation =
noteWidgetIndex === -1 || noteWidgetIndex < firstFieldsWidgetIndex
? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1)
: [
...tab.widgets.slice(
firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1,
noteWidgetIndex,
),
...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1),
];
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
Comment on lines
+100
to
+101
| const noteWidget = | ||
| noteWidgetIndex !== -1 ? [tab.widgets[noteWidgetIndex]] : []; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: This will also extract NOTES widget incorrectly when noteWidgetIndex < firstFieldsWidgetIndex. The NOTES widget should only be repositioned if it appears after the FIELDS widget.
Suggested change
| const noteWidget = | |
| noteWidgetIndex !== -1 ? [tab.widgets[noteWidgetIndex]] : []; | |
| const noteWidget = | |
| noteWidgetIndex !== -1 && noteWidgetIndex > firstFieldsWidgetIndex | |
| ? [tab.widgets[noteWidgetIndex]] | |
| : []; |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts
Line: 100:101
Comment:
**logic:** This will also extract NOTES widget incorrectly when `noteWidgetIndex < firstFieldsWidgetIndex`. The NOTES widget should only be repositioned if it appears after the FIELDS widget.
```suggestion
const noteWidget =
noteWidgetIndex !== -1 && noteWidgetIndex > firstFieldsWidgetIndex
? [tab.widgets[noteWidgetIndex]]
: [];
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
Comment on lines
+289
to
+316
| it('should handle layout without Note widget', () => { | ||
| const layoutWithoutNotes: PageLayout = { | ||
| ...mockBasePageLayout, | ||
| tabs: [ | ||
| { | ||
| ...mockBasePageLayout.tabs[0], | ||
| widgets: [ | ||
| mockBasePageLayout.tabs[0].widgets[0], // FIELDS widget | ||
| mockBasePageLayout.tabs[0].widgets[2], // OTHER widget | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const { result } = renderHook(() => | ||
| usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets(layoutWithoutNotes), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const firstTab = result.current?.tabs[0]; | ||
| const widgets = firstTab?.widgets || []; | ||
|
|
||
| expect(widgets.length).toBe(4); // 1 FIELDS + 2 relation + 1 OTHER | ||
|
|
||
| expect(widgets[0].type).toBe(WidgetType.FIELDS); | ||
| expect(widgets[1].type).toBe(WidgetType.FIELD); | ||
| expect(widgets[2].type).toBe(WidgetType.FIELD); | ||
| expect(widgets[3].type).toBe(WidgetType.GRAPH); | ||
| }); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: Add test case for edge case where NOTES widget appears before FIELDS widget (e.g., [NOTES, FIELDS, OTHER]). Current tests don't cover this scenario, which would expose the logic bug at lines 89-101.
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/__tests__/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.test.tsx
Line: 289:316
Comment:
**style:** Add test case for edge case where NOTES widget appears before FIELDS widget (e.g., `[NOTES, FIELDS, OTHER]`). Current tests don't cover this scenario, which would expose the logic bug at lines 89-101.
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR fixes the widget injection order in page layouts to ensure relation widgets appear immediately after the FIELDS widget, and NOTES widgets are repositioned after all relation widgets. This addresses an issue where relation widgets were previously appended to the end of the widget list.
Changes:
- Modified
injectRelationWidgetsIntoLayoutto insert relation widgets after the first FIELDS widget instead of appending to the end - Added logic to extract and reposition NOTES widgets after relation widgets
- Added comprehensive test suite with 6 test cases covering various scenarios
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts |
Implements new widget injection logic to place relation widgets after FIELDS and NOTES after relations |
packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/__tests__/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.test.tsx |
Adds comprehensive test coverage for the new injection behavior and edge cases |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Comment on lines
+81
to
+83
| const noteWidgetIndex = tab.widgets.findIndex( | ||
| (widget) => widget.type === WidgetType.NOTES, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The implementation uses findIndex to locate the NOTES widget, which only finds the first occurrence. If there are multiple NOTES widgets in the layout, only the first one will be repositioned after the relation widgets, while subsequent NOTES widgets will remain in their original positions. This could lead to inconsistent widget ordering. Consider whether this is the intended behavior or if all NOTES widgets should be repositioned, or if the presence of multiple NOTES widgets should be prevented.
Comment on lines
+81
to
+98
| const noteWidgetIndex = tab.widgets.findIndex( | ||
| (widget) => widget.type === WidgetType.NOTES, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const widgetsBeforeRelation = tab.widgets.slice( | ||
| 0, | ||
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | ||
| ); | ||
| const widgetsAfterRelation = | ||
| noteWidgetIndex === -1 | ||
| ? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | ||
| : [ | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice( | ||
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | ||
| noteWidgetIndex, | ||
| ), | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1), | ||
| ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for extracting widgets after the FIELDS widget has an issue when a NOTES widget exists between FIELDS and the end of the list. When noteWidgetIndex !== -1, the code extracts widgets between FIELDS and NOTES (lines 93-96), then widgets after NOTES (line 97). However, if the NOTES widget is immediately after the FIELDS widget (e.g., at index firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1), the slice on lines 93-96 will have firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1 as start and noteWidgetIndex as end with the same value, resulting in an empty array. This is actually correct behavior, but the logic could be clearer.
More critically, the current implementation doesn't handle the case where NOTES appears BEFORE the FIELDS widget. In that scenario, noteWidgetIndex could be less than firstFieldsWidgetIndex, which would cause the slicing logic to behave incorrectly. The slice from firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1 to noteWidgetIndex would produce an empty array (which is fine), but then the NOTES widget would still be repositioned after relations even though it was originally before FIELDS, changing the intended layout unexpectedly.
Comment on lines
+289
to
+317
| it('should handle layout without Note widget', () => { | ||
| const layoutWithoutNotes: PageLayout = { | ||
| ...mockBasePageLayout, | ||
| tabs: [ | ||
| { | ||
| ...mockBasePageLayout.tabs[0], | ||
| widgets: [ | ||
| mockBasePageLayout.tabs[0].widgets[0], // FIELDS widget | ||
| mockBasePageLayout.tabs[0].widgets[2], // OTHER widget | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const { result } = renderHook(() => | ||
| usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets(layoutWithoutNotes), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const firstTab = result.current?.tabs[0]; | ||
| const widgets = firstTab?.widgets || []; | ||
|
|
||
| expect(widgets.length).toBe(4); // 1 FIELDS + 2 relation + 1 OTHER | ||
|
|
||
| expect(widgets[0].type).toBe(WidgetType.FIELDS); | ||
| expect(widgets[1].type).toBe(WidgetType.FIELD); | ||
| expect(widgets[2].type).toBe(WidgetType.FIELD); | ||
| expect(widgets[3].type).toBe(WidgetType.GRAPH); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing test coverage for the edge case where a NOTES widget appears before the FIELDS widget in the original layout. This scenario would expose a bug in the repositioning logic where the NOTES widget would be incorrectly moved after the relation widgets even though it was originally positioned before FIELDS. A test case should be added to verify this edge case is handled correctly.
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 2 files
Prompt for AI agents (all issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them.
<file name="packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts">
<violation number="1" location="packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts:85">
P2: NOTE widgets that appear before the first FIELDS widget will be duplicated (and FIELDS may be duplicated) because the NOTE is not removed from widgetsBeforeRelation while also being reinserted. Filter NOTE out of both slices so it can be reinserted exactly once after relations regardless of its original position.</violation>
</file>
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.
Comment on lines
+85
to
+101
| const widgetsBeforeRelation = tab.widgets.slice( | ||
| 0, | ||
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | ||
| ); | ||
| const widgetsAfterRelation = | ||
| noteWidgetIndex === -1 | ||
| ? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | ||
| : [ | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice( | ||
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | ||
| noteWidgetIndex, | ||
| ), | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1), | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| const noteWidget = | ||
| noteWidgetIndex !== -1 ? [tab.widgets[noteWidgetIndex]] : []; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: NOTE widgets that appear before the first FIELDS widget will be duplicated (and FIELDS may be duplicated) because the NOTE is not removed from widgetsBeforeRelation while also being reinserted. Filter NOTE out of both slices so it can be reinserted exactly once after relations regardless of its original position.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts, line 85:
<comment>NOTE widgets that appear before the first FIELDS widget will be duplicated (and FIELDS may be duplicated) because the NOTE is not removed from widgetsBeforeRelation while also being reinserted. Filter NOTE out of both slices so it can be reinserted exactly once after relations regardless of its original position.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -67,9 +67,47 @@ const injectRelationWidgetsIntoLayout = (
+ (widget) => widget.type === WidgetType.NOTES,
+ );
+
+ const widgetsBeforeRelation = tab.widgets.slice(
+ 0,
+ firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1,
</file context>
Suggested change
| const widgetsBeforeRelation = tab.widgets.slice( | |
| 0, | |
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | |
| ); | |
| const widgetsAfterRelation = | |
| noteWidgetIndex === -1 | |
| ? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | |
| : [ | |
| ...tab.widgets.slice( | |
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | |
| noteWidgetIndex, | |
| ), | |
| ...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1), | |
| ]; | |
| const noteWidget = | |
| noteWidgetIndex !== -1 ? [tab.widgets[noteWidgetIndex]] : []; | |
| const widgetsBeforeRelation = tab.widgets | |
| .slice(0, firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | |
| .filter((_, index) => index !== noteWidgetIndex); | |
| const widgetsAfterRelation = tab.widgets | |
| .slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | |
| .filter( | |
| (_, index) => | |
| index + firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1 !== noteWidgetIndex, | |
| ); | |
| const noteWidget = | |
| noteWidgetIndex !== -1 ? [tab.widgets[noteWidgetIndex]] : []; |
martmull
reviewed
Jan 20, 2026
Comment on lines
70
to
104
| const firstFieldsWidgetIndex = tab.widgets.findIndex( | ||
| (widget) => widget.type === WidgetType.FIELDS, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| if (firstFieldsWidgetIndex === -1) { | ||
| return { | ||
| ...tab, | ||
| widgets: [...tab.widgets, ...relationWidgets], | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const noteWidgetIndex = tab.widgets.findIndex( | ||
| (widget) => widget.type === WidgetType.NOTES, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const widgetsBeforeRelation = tab.widgets.slice( | ||
| 0, | ||
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | ||
| ); | ||
| const widgetsAfterRelation = | ||
| noteWidgetIndex === -1 | ||
| ? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | ||
| : [ | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice( | ||
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | ||
| noteWidgetIndex, | ||
| ), | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1), | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| const noteWidget = | ||
| noteWidgetIndex !== -1 ? [tab.widgets[noteWidgetIndex]] : []; | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| ...tab, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You need to move that in a unit tested utils
Comment on lines
+81
to
+83
| const noteWidgetIndex = tab.widgets.findIndex( | ||
| (widget) => widget.type === WidgetType.NOTES, | ||
| ); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you seems to assume there is maximum one WidgetType.NOTES is this the case?
Comment on lines
+89
to
+99
| const widgetsAfterRelation = | ||
| noteWidgetIndex === -1 | ||
| ? tab.widgets.slice(firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1) | ||
| : [ | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice( | ||
| firstFieldsWidgetIndex + 1, | ||
| noteWidgetIndex, | ||
| ), | ||
| ...tab.widgets.slice(noteWidgetIndex + 1), | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hard to understand to be honest. if there is no note widget then widget after relation in the next widget after fields? it looks not obvious i think we need at least some comment to explain business hypothesis here
Contributor
LogDetails |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 1 file (changes from recent commits).
Prompt for AI agents (all issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them.
<file name="packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts">
<violation number="1" location="packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts:82">
P3: Misleading comment: Notes are inserted after relation widgets, but the comment says they are displayed before relations. Update the comment to reflect the actual ordering to avoid future regressions.</violation>
</file>
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // TODO: This note widget repositioning logic is temporary and will be deleted soon. | ||
| // We need this to ensure the note editor is displayed before record relations, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: Misleading comment: Notes are inserted after relation widgets, but the comment says they are displayed before relations. Update the comment to reflect the actual ordering to avoid future regressions.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts, line 82:
<comment>Misleading comment: Notes are inserted after relation widgets, but the comment says they are displayed before relations. Update the comment to reflect the actual ordering to avoid future regressions.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ const injectRelationWidgetsIntoLayout = (
}
+ // TODO: This note widget repositioning logic is temporary and will be deleted soon.
+ // We need this to ensure the note editor is displayed before record relations,
+ // matching the behavior of the old show page.
const noteWidgetIndex = tab.widgets.findIndex(
</file context>
Suggested change
| // We need this to ensure the note editor is displayed before record relations, | |
| // We need this to ensure the note editor is displayed after record relations, |
martmull
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2026
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
|
Hey @Devessier! After you've done the QA of your Pull Request, you can mark it as done here. Thank you! |
1 similar comment
|
Hey @Devessier! After you've done the QA of your Pull Request, you can mark it as done here. Thank you! |
lucasbordeau
pushed a commit
to vasu1303/twenty
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2026
…s after relations (twentyhq#17274) > [!NOTE] > This code is temporary. It will be dropped once Record Page Layouts can be fully configured. ## Before https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3f6aed00-2fd5-47d4-bd74-002a68030627 ## After <img width="3456" height="2160" alt="CleanShot 2026-01-20 at 15 17 15@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f9baf0a-e003-4cb6-a023-6e104b097df3" /> The `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` hook was appending relation widgets to the end of the widget list. This resulted in incorrect ordering where relation widgets appeared after Notes and other widgets instead of immediately following the FIELDS widget. ## Changes - **Widget injection logic**: Modified `injectRelationWidgetsIntoLayout` to find the first FIELDS widget and insert relation widgets immediately after it, rather than appending to end - **Notes positioning**: Extract and reposition NOTES widget to appear after all relation widgets, maintaining correct semantic order: `FIELDS → Relations → Notes → Other widgets` - **Fallback behavior**: When no FIELDS widget exists, append relation widgets to end as before - **Test coverage**: Added 6 test cases covering injection order, Notes positioning, and edge cases (missing widgets, empty relations, non-record pages) ## Example Before: ``` [FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH] → [FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH, Relation1, Relation2] ``` After: ``` [FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH] → [FIELDS, Relation1, Relation2, NOTES, GRAPH] ``` > [!WARNING] > > <details> > <summary>Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)</summary> > > #### I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules: > > - `googlechromelabs.github.io` > - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node install.mjs` (dns block) > - `https://storage.googleapis.com/chrome-for-testing-public/127.0.6533.88/linux64/chrome-headless-shell-linux64.zip` > - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node install.mjs` (http block) > - `https://storage.googleapis.com/chrome-for-testing-public/127.0.6533.88/linux64/chrome-linux64.zip` > - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node install.mjs` (http block) > > If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either: > > - Configure [Actions setup steps](https://gh.io/copilot/actions-setup-steps) to set up my environment, which run before the firewall is enabled > - Add the appropriate URLs or hosts to the custom allowlist in this repository's [Copilot coding agent settings](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/settings/copilot/coding_agent) (admins only) > > </details> <!-- START COPILOT ORIGINAL PROMPT --> <details> <summary>Original prompt</summary> Start implementation <analysis> [Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting an update to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function to inject relation widgets after the first FIELDS widget and to position a Note widget after all relation widgets. The user then asked for a plan without comments, followed by a request to start the implementation of the plan.] [Intent Mapping: 1. "Update #sym:usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets. We should inject the relation widgets directly after the first FIELDS widget." 2. "We want the Note widget to be after all the relation widgets we inject." 3. "Prepare a plan. Don't write any comment." 4. "Start implementation."] [Technical Inventory: - Function: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` - Context: This function is part of a page layout management system, likely dealing with dynamic widget placement based on certain conditions.] [Code Archaeology: - File: `/Users/devessier/Web/twenty/packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts` - Function Purpose: To manage the layout of widgets on a page, specifically handling relation widgets and their placement relative to other widgets.] [Progress Assessment: - Completed: User has defined the requirements for widget placement. - Pending: Implementation of the specified changes to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function.] [Context Validation: All necessary context for continuing the implementation of the widget placement logic is captured, including the specific order of widget injection.] [Recent Commands Analysis: - Last Agent Commands: The user requested to "Start implementation." - Tool Results Summary: No specific tool results were generated as the conversation focused on planning and implementation requests. - Pre-Summary State: The agent was actively preparing to implement the changes to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function when the token budget was exceeded. - Operation Context: The commands executed were directly related to the user's goal of modifying the widget layout in the application.] </analysis> <summary> 1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: - "Update #sym:usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets. We should inject the relation widgets directly after the first FIELDS widget." - "We want the Note widget to be after all the relation widgets we inject." - "Prepare a plan. Don't write any comment." - "Start implementation." - Session Context: The user is focused on modifying the widget layout in a page layout management system, specifically the order of relation and Note widgets. - User Intent Evolution: The user transitioned from defining requirements to requesting a plan and then moving directly to implementation. 2. Technical Foundation: - Function: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` - Purpose: To manage the layout of widgets on a page, particularly the placement of relation widgets. 3. Codebase Status: - File Name: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts` - Purpose: To handle the layout of widgets dynamically based on specified rules. - Current State: Awaiting implementation of the user-defined widget placement logic. - Key Code Segments: The function signature is defined, but the implementation details are yet to be added. 4. Problem Resolution: - Issues Encountered: No specific technical problems were reported; the focus was on planning and implementation. - Solutions Implemented: None yet, as the implementation phase has just begun. - Debugging Context: No ongoing troubleshooting efforts were mentioned. - Lessons Learned: The importance of clear widget placement requirements was emphasized. 5. Progress Tracking: - Completed Tasks: User has articulated the requirements for widget placement. - Partially Complete Work: Implementation of the specified changes is pending. - Validated Outcomes: No features have been confirmed working yet as implementation has not started. 6. Active Work State: - Current Focus: The user is preparing to implement the changes to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function. - Recent Context: The user has defined the order of widget placement and is ready to start coding. - Working Code: The function is currently defined but lacks the implementation logic. - Immediate Context: The user is focused on implementing the logic for injecting relation widgets and positioning the Note widget. 7. Recent Operations: - Last Agent Commands: "Start implementation." - Tool Results Summary: No specific results were generated; the focus was on user requests. - Pre-Summary State: The agent was preparing to implement the changes to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function. - Operation Context: The commands executed were directly related to the user's goal of modifying the widget layout. 8. Continuation Plan: - Pending Task 1: Implement the logic to inject relation widgets after the first FIELDS widget. - Pending Task 2: Ensure the Note widget is positioned after all relation widgets... </details> <!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX --> Created from [VS Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/copilot-coding-agent). <!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS --> --- 💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our [2 minute survey](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-survey). --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Devessier <29370468+Devessier@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note
This code is temporary. It will be dropped once Record Page Layouts can be fully configured.
Before
CleanShot.2026-01-20.at.11.15.58.mp4
After
The
usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgetshook was appending relation widgets to the end of the widget list. This resulted in incorrect ordering where relation widgets appeared after Notes and other widgets instead of immediately following the FIELDS widget.Changes
injectRelationWidgetsIntoLayoutto find the first FIELDS widget and insert relation widgets immediately after it, rather than appending to endFIELDS → Relations → Notes → Other widgetsExample
Before:
After:
Warning
Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)
I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
googlechromelabs.github.io/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node install.mjs(dns block)https://storage.googleapis.com/chrome-for-testing-public/127.0.6533.88/linux64/chrome-headless-shell-linux64.zip/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node install.mjs(http block)https://storage.googleapis.com/chrome-for-testing-public/127.0.6533.88/linux64/chrome-linux64.zip/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node install.mjs(http block)If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
Original prompt
Start implementation
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting an update to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function to inject relation widgets after the first FIELDS widget and to position a Note widget after all relation widgets. The user then asked for a plan without comments, followed by a request to start the implementation of the plan.][Intent Mapping:
[Technical Inventory:
usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets[Code Archaeology:
/Users/devessier/Web/twenty/packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts[Progress Assessment:
usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgetsfunction.][Context Validation: All necessary context for continuing the implementation of the widget placement logic is captured, including the specific order of widget injection.]
[Recent Commands Analysis:
usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgetsfunction when the token budget was exceeded.1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: - "Update #sym:usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets. We should inject the relation widgets directly after the first FIELDS widget." - "We want the Note widget to be after all the relation widgets we inject." - "Prepare a plan. Don't write any comment." - "Start implementation." - Session Context: The user is focused on modifying the widget layout in a page layout management system, specifically the order of relation and Note widgets. - User Intent Evolution: The user transitioned from defining requirements to requesting a plan and then moving directly to implementation.- Technical Foundation:
- Function:
- Purpose: To manage the layout of widgets on a page, particularly the placement of relation widgets.
- Codebase Status:
- File Name:
- Purpose: To handle the layout of widgets dynamically based on specified rules.
- Current State: Awaiting implementation of the user-defined widget placement logic.
- Key Code Segments: The function signature is defined, but the implementation details are yet to be added.
- Problem Resolution:
- Issues Encountered: No specific technical problems were reported; the focus was on planning and implementation.
- Solutions Implemented: None yet, as the implementation phase has just begun.
- Debugging Context: No ongoing troubleshooting efforts were mentioned.
- Lessons Learned: The importance of clear widget placement requirements was emphasized.
- Progress Tracking:
- Completed Tasks: User has articulated the requirements for widget placement.
- Partially Complete Work: Implementation of the specified changes is pending.
- Validated Outcomes: No features have been confirmed working yet as implementation has not started.
- Active Work State:
- Current Focus: The user is preparing to implement the changes to the
- Recent Context: The user has defined the order of widget placement and is ready to start coding.
- Working Code: The function is currently defined but lacks the implementation logic.
- Immediate Context: The user is focused on implementing the logic for injecting relation widgets and positioning the Note widget.
- Recent Operations:
- Last Agent Commands: "Start implementation."
- Tool Results Summary: No specific results were generated; the focus was on user requests.
- Pre-Summary State: The agent was preparing to implement the changes to the
- Operation Context: The commands executed were directly related to the user's goal of modifying the widget layout.
- Continuation Plan:
- Pending Task 1: Implement the logic to inject relation widgets after the first FIELDS widget.
- Pending Task 2: Ensure the Note widget is positioned after all relation widgets...
usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgetsusePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.tsusePageLayoutWithRelationWidgetsfunction.usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgetsfunction.Created from VS Code.
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.