Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis pull request fixes a bounds-checking vulnerability in Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1541 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 88.48% 88.48%
- Complexity 2843 2845 +2
=========================================
Files 103 103
Lines 9490 9491 +1
Branches 1905 1906 +1
=========================================
+ Hits 8397 8398 +1
Misses 531 531
Partials 562 562 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
It seems that in certain cases for annotations on lambda parameters, the
parameter_indexfield of aTypePositioncan be negative on JDK 27. This was causing a crash; fix by checking for a negative index.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests