This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 19, 2024. It is now read-only.
Replies: 1 comment
|
This could lead to a mess with custom/obscure prices. We could quantize prices to be at $50 increments to make it look neater! |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We can make pricing more competitive/accurate based on how high the market is. We all know that in a bull market its harder to convince devs to work on your crypto project.
https://github.com/ubiquity/bounty-bot/blob/e743239e69b7bbdc9a91eef20ccf8c3a166ab223/src/configs/price.ts#L4
We have a base rate here which could be a proxy for the current price of Ether. If ETH is at $2000, then our smallest bounties (as of writing this, currently looking to introduce an even smaller bounty size) can go up from $100 -> $200 for example.
I think its important to make sure that each project can configure what pricing strategy/formula/algorithm they deploy for each repo, as perhaps some projects would be less keen on being as competitive. I think our current strategy of set prices is simple to comprehend for most projects, but I would love to enable this "market price/dynamic pricing" as sort of an "opt-in" feature.
The price of Ether is a generic/simple/top-of-mind quantity I'm using here, but I believe that perhaps we could consider including the entire crypto market cap as well. I think for the foreseeable future, using the price of Ether as an oracle is sufficient.
All reactions