What's the modest behavior for .ss and .sps extensions?

[ufo5260987423]

For extensions SS, and SCM, most programmers suppose their codes are writing for a running environment and don't provide any library information. Although with Akku and Snow, SLS and SLD files can base a project on a stable library framework, load, load-program and many other procedures which maintain dynamic library linkages make static code analysis telling less.

However, many famous programmers still coding in extensions SS, and SCM, what will the community think, for the modest behavior that scheme-langserver do?

[ufo5260987423]

I've just released 1.0.12 version and it added ss/scm-import-rnrs option, so that all files with ss/scm extension defaultly import chezscheme library (instead of rnrs because chez-scheme's rnrs seems don't have "import" procedure. That really puzzles me.)

And, after such long time, it seems that no one has any better idea so I'll close this discussion