Skip to content

docs: add link to README of stable version#358

Merged
ctavan merged 1 commit intonextfrom
back-to-trunk-based-development
Jan 28, 2020
Merged

docs: add link to README of stable version#358
ctavan merged 1 commit intonextfrom
back-to-trunk-based-development

Conversation

@ctavan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ctavan ctavan commented Jan 27, 2020

@broofa I would like to merge the next branch into master now and revert to trunk-based development. Having the two diverging branches already starts to cause some headache and I would like to avoid that.

I would therefore add a notice to the Readme that points to the current "stable" readme until we release the next major version of this library and then go ahead and merge the next branch into master.

I would then release the first canary prerelease of the new major version for folks to try out.

I was considering to release it as v6.0.0 instead of v4.0.0 in order to avoid any potential confusion around v3/v4/v5 uuids.

WDYT?

@ctavan ctavan requested a review from broofa January 27, 2020 22:29
@ctavan ctavan force-pushed the back-to-trunk-based-development branch from 3c1f96d to 6cabebf Compare January 28, 2020 10:00
@broofa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

broofa commented Jan 28, 2020

Sounds good. Re: having next release as v4 vs. v6, if you're going to do that, then just go with v7 to avoid possible confusion with the "v6" RFC UUID idea we've been bandying about.

@ctavan ctavan force-pushed the back-to-trunk-based-development branch from 6cabebf to 266bc81 Compare January 28, 2020 21:17
@ctavan ctavan merged commit 0f74f08 into next Jan 28, 2020
@ctavan ctavan deleted the back-to-trunk-based-development branch January 28, 2020 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants