Skip to content

refactor(buf_copy): remove unused code#12081

Open
xtqqczze wants to merge 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:buf_copy
Open

refactor(buf_copy): remove unused code#12081
xtqqczze wants to merge 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:buf_copy

Conversation

@xtqqczze
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@xtqqczze xtqqczze marked this pull request as draft April 29, 2026 12:25
@xtqqczze xtqqczze closed this Apr 29, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 311 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing xtqqczze:buf_copy (b178512) with main (5316f58)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@xtqqczze xtqqczze reopened this Apr 29, 2026
@xtqqczze xtqqczze changed the title refactor(buf_copy): remove unused code refactor: error handling in buf_copy Apr 29, 2026
@xtqqczze xtqqczze force-pushed the buf_copy branch 3 times, most recently from c1e0d9e to 9239bde Compare April 29, 2026 14:03
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/symlink (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now passing!
Skip an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (was skipped on 'main', now failing)

@xtqqczze

This comment was marked as outdated.

@xtqqczze xtqqczze changed the title refactor: error handling in buf_copy refactor(buf_copy): remove unused code Apr 29, 2026
@xtqqczze
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@oech3 Do you need this for #11607?

@oech3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

oech3 commented Apr 29, 2026

Maybe, no

@xtqqczze xtqqczze marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2026 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants