Skip to content

yes: reduce lines by cfg#12295

Open
oech3 wants to merge 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
oech3:yes-cfg
Open

yes: reduce lines by cfg#12295
oech3 wants to merge 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
oech3:yes-cfg

Conversation

@oech3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@oech3 oech3 commented May 14, 2026

Reduce lines and nest caused by {}.

@oech3 oech3 changed the title yes: redice lines by cfg yes: reduce lines by cfg May 14, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 14, 2026

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 19.55%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 316 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Memory cp_recursive_deep_tree[(120, 4)] 562.5 KB 699.2 KB -19.55%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing oech3:yes-cfg (cbd31e3) with main (6a942ba)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/expand/bounded-memory is now passing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now passing!

@oech3 oech3 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2026 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants