Skip to content

Add support for YAML-formatted vocabularies #1089

@wbh1

Description

@wbh1

Check for existing issues

  • Completed

Describe the feature

Related

semi-related to #1068
Continuation of discussion in #993

Summary

This issue is being created to track the outcome of discussion in PR #993, in which it seemed the direction for supporting more vocabulary features is to allow YAML-formatted vocabularies.

Relevant comments:

Yes -- honestly, I'd like to move vocabularies to YAML files as well. This would make them much more robust in many ways (comment handling, feature additions, conditional entries, etc).1

and

I'm going to try to get support for YAML-formatted vocabularies into the next release.2

Footnotes

  1. https://github.com/vale-cli/vale/pull/993#issuecomment-2938809059

  2. https://github.com/vale-cli/vale/pull/993#issuecomment-3790521759

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions