Skip to content

Conversation

@day0hero
Copy link
Contributor

@day0hero day0hero commented Jul 1, 2025

  • init for gpfs
  • removing extraneous information from the docs card

@mbaldessari
Copy link
Contributor

This is an automated message:

You can preview this docs PR at http://580.docs-pr.validatedpatterns.io
Note that they get generated every five minutes, so please wait a bit.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M label Jul 1, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@abhatt-rh abhatt-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some nits, rest LGTM!

git: https://github.com/mhjacks
---

This pattern is under development.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
This pattern is under development.
[NOTE]
====
This pattern is under development.
====


This pattern is under development.

Please reference the link:https://github.com/validatedpatterns-sandbox/gpfs-tester[Git Repository] for more information.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Please reference the link:https://github.com/validatedpatterns-sandbox/gpfs-tester[Git Repository] for more information.
For more information, refer to the link:https://github.com/validatedpatterns-sandbox/gpfs-tester[GPFS git repository]

@day0hero
Copy link
Contributor Author

day0hero commented Jul 1, 2025

Thanks @abhatt-rh!

@day0hero day0hero merged commit 01b5935 into validatedpatterns:main Jul 1, 2025
4 checks passed
@day0hero day0hero deleted the gpfs branch July 1, 2025 15:43
@day0hero day0hero restored the gpfs branch July 1, 2025 15:59
@day0hero day0hero deleted the gpfs branch July 1, 2025 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants