As a user of validated patterns I would like to be able to use non 'route-53' based challenges.
The letsencrypt helm chart provides value in terms of dealing with the guts of integration with OCP' and ensuring route certificates are updated. However, if I am not using route53 but rather using one of the other supported DNS01 challenge providers for cert-manager (https://cert-manager.io/docs/configuration/acme/dns01/) I will effectively have to fork the chart.
Therefore I would suggest that there is a "BYO issuer" where the end user can configure their own DNS01 challenge provider.
As a user of validated patterns I would like to be able to use non 'route-53' based challenges.
The letsencrypt helm chart provides value in terms of dealing with the guts of integration with OCP' and ensuring route certificates are updated. However, if I am not using route53 but rather using one of the other supported DNS01 challenge providers for cert-manager (https://cert-manager.io/docs/configuration/acme/dns01/) I will effectively have to fork the chart.
Therefore I would suggest that there is a "BYO issuer" where the end user can configure their own DNS01 challenge provider.