Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
This branch is built on top of |
Collaborator
|
Would you mind making a clean branch off main ad cherry picking the one commit there? Then we can merge these separately. |
Collaborator
|
Or for a simple as it is just cherry picking straight to main this time is fine |
5b42629 to
3bff0af
Compare
Replace print statement with row assignment in test.
Collaborator
Author
|
Thanks for sorting out the branches! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per #14, gene-wide dN/dS is currently always reported as 0, which is biologically implausible. Since gene-wide dN/dS isn't a particularly useful metric, I'd rather remove it than try to troubleshoot exactly why it's behaving so strangely.