[builders][web-shared] Improvements to o11y and fixes to graph generation code path#1031
Merged
karthikscale3 merged 21 commits intomainfrom Feb 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…hanges Rebase the branch intent onto latest main by preserving web-shared UI refactors and builders base-builder updates while taking main for hydration and data-fetching behavior elsewhere. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 6c8b089 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 15 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Contributor
Contributor
📊 Benchmark Results
workflow with no steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack) workflow with 1 step💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack) workflow with 10 sequential steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack) workflow with 25 sequential steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro workflow with 50 sequential steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)workflow with stream💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack) SummaryFastest Framework by WorldWinner determined by most benchmark wins
Fastest World by FrameworkWinner determined by most benchmark wins
Column Definitions
Worlds:
|
Contributor
🧪 E2E Test Results❌ Some tests failed Summary
❌ Failed Tests🌍 Community Worlds (42 failed)turso (42 failed):
Details by Category✅ ▲ Vercel Production
✅ 💻 Local Development
✅ 📦 Local Production
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
✅ 🪟 Windows
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
✅ 📋 Other
|
Revert the hydration reviver delta for URL, URLSearchParams, and Headers so web-shared matches main behavior while keeping the targeted UI/builders-only scope on this branch. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Bring the web-shared trace/detail panel files back in sync with main so PR #1017 behavior is preserved and not regressed on this branch. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
…mprovements-main-sync
…mprovements-main-sync
…mprovements-main-sync
…mprovements-main-sync
TooTallNate
reviewed
Feb 13, 2026
| > = {}; | ||
| if (!workflows) return result; | ||
|
|
||
| // Build a normalized lookup for graphs since the graph extractor uses |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just noting that this probably can go away after #902 is merged.
Member
Code ReviewThe core logic changes (builders graph path normalization, serialization hydration) are solid. The UI rewrite is a large but cohesive redesign. No blockers, but a few items worth flagging. Bugs Worth Fixing1. Stale closure in 2. Inline style vs Tailwind conflict — 3. AbortController signal not wired to fetch — Medium Issues (Non-Blocking)4. Missing CSS variables — 5. 6. Minor / Informational
What Looks Good
Items 1-3 are worth fixing before merge; the rest are fine as follow-ups. |
TooTallNate
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2026
Member
TooTallNate
left a comment
TooTallNate
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All review items from my earlier pass have been addressed in the latest commit. LGTM.
This was referenced Feb 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Test plan