Skip to content

[docs] Update tweet wall#1708

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 78 commits intomainfrom
karthik/update-tweets
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

[docs] Update tweet wall#1708
karthikscale3 merged 78 commits intomainfrom
karthik/update-tweets

Conversation

@karthikscale3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Changes

Updating tweet wall with 5 additional tweets

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 13, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 918 5 67 990
✅ 💻 Local Development 898 0 182 1080
❌ 📦 Local Production 897 1 182 1080
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 898 0 182 1080
✅ 🪟 Windows 82 0 8 90
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 133 74 24 231
✅ 📋 Other 228 0 42 270
Total 4054 80 687 4821

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (5 failed)

astro (3 failed):

  • outputStreamWorkflow positive startIndex (skips first chunk)
  • outputStreamWorkflow - getTailIndex and getChunks getTailIndex returns correct index after stream completes
  • outputStreamInsideStepWorkflow - getWritable() called inside step functions | wrun_01KP47DAQF7GF92FJ29MPE2VVB | 🔍 observability

sveltekit (2 failed):

  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KP47A6HA7XHDPNF4J682K0X9 | 🔍 observability
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KP47PNN4FWZQ99E10VM428M4 | 🔍 observability
📦 Local Production (1 failed)

express-stable (1 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KP479XT0GZ4B1A7DV2TZ7E35
🌍 Community Worlds (74 failed)

mongodb (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KP479XT0GZ4B1A7DV2TZ7E35
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KP47A6HA7XHDPNF4J682K0X9
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KP47DRM7EW94CNM0F4A4JGB6
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KP47HQR4YXZR8REMJAP0PRRY
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KP47QXP4Z4HC9Z80C93CVRWX

redis (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KP479XT0GZ4B1A7DV2TZ7E35
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KP47A6HA7XHDPNF4J682K0X9
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KP47DRM7EW94CNM0F4A4JGB6
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KP47HQR4YXZR8REMJAP0PRRY
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KP47QXP4Z4HC9Z80C93CVRWX

turso (60 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KP478P75Z049E7FWNJ33EAV5
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KP478P75Z049E7FWNJ33EAV5
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KP47ABRHXTDRD9KWG9PGCQ83
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KP478YV5NZMR1AYX7RPZ76GW
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KP47939MAHKHEQP720KZM0RZ
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KP4795R509A4J3R73FV94WN9
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KP47AP443FAK0VMWK2CBRXQC
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KP479JFAQXYF7GBQE8487KRM
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KP479XT0GZ4B1A7DV2TZ7E35
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KP47A6HA7XHDPNF4J682K0X9
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KP47ADK66JRA2W7JYGQD8ZSQ
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KP47ASH7BVPT78HTE25VTDPM
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KP47AXQZSACTND90RCWJNZW4
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KP47AZMKPB53VN899RTQEWVP
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KP47DRM7EW94CNM0F4A4JGB6
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KP47DVP6KHDD5GN9XG9Y4WRT
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KP47H4WYT2KQJQG9AK5N3Y34
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KP47HQR4YXZR8REMJAP0PRRY
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KP47JAVFD82X51PQ7BWWN9BW
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KP47JY7NHG5ZC908GH3YKKF9
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KP47K5X0FBQ220X9C1Z53XKR
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KP47KAPC98Z3CV5XRXNQ8D57
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KP47KCXRASV2HD7ZVNV844YM
  • runClassSerializationWorkflow - Run instances serialize across workflow/step boundaries | wrun_01KP47KPQVSG3MXAMA89D65P60
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KP47M53DR6EZH3R6604T4EMA
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KP47MA5WZ3DSW2HEWAF1GAFT
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KP47MG0RBZYBJTSXY2K6TX3D
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KP47MP3YG3G6HWHZRGBF3GC7
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KP47MW2M336B673YRM912C0K
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KP47N1V6Y4Z5C06DKSW6A5TY
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KP47N8S97W84JAJA4SCMKS5X
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KP47NKKHP9F7AGR86CFTPHBE
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KP47NV5CWHV0VRHM6QTTWJT4
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KP47P139X2P6FA4KVZE3J3VD
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KP47PAGGJ0JHFV0WQVKG6C3D
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KP47PNN4FWZQ99E10VM428M4
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KP47Q8MKX3HK9EECB6XC2YRH
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KP47QKMM6M9A1MNE4M5YVDHE
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KP47QSWRDP8YY67S2FDSW9NK
  • metadataFromHelperWorkflow - getWorkflowMetadata/getStepMetadata work from module-level helper (#1577) | wrun_01KP47QVSS1AF7G5EATFRFYA58
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KP47QXP4Z4HC9Z80C93CVRWX
  • getterStepWorkflow - getter functions with "use step" directive | wrun_01KP47R0Q6FYF5G6NND1FG2587

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
❌ astro 80 3 7
✅ example 83 0 7
✅ express 83 0 7
✅ fastify 83 0 7
✅ hono 83 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 88 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 88 0 2
✅ nitro 83 0 7
✅ nuxt 83 0 7
❌ sveltekit 81 2 7
✅ vite 83 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
❌ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
❌ express-stable 75 1 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 82 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 6 0 0
❌ mongodb 56 7 8
✅ redis-dev 6 0 0
❌ redis 56 7 8
✅ turso-dev 6 0 0
❌ turso 3 60 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 76 0 14

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: failure
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 13, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.042s (~) 1.006s (~) 0.964s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.044s (+21.8% 🔺) 1.006s (~) 0.962s 10 1.07x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.059s (-12.6% 🟢) 1.011s (~) 0.952s 10 1.41x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.060s (+3.8%) 1.009s (~) 0.950s 10 1.44x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.250s (-4.6%) 1.844s (-18.4% 🟢) 1.595s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 1.132s (+3.2%) 2.006s (~) 0.874s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.133s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.873s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.136s (-1.2%) 2.009s (~) 0.873s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.142s (-0.7%) 2.010s (~) 0.868s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.053s (~) 3.716s (-9.3% 🟢) 1.663s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 10.871s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.151s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.905s (~) 11.021s (~) 0.116s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 10.932s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.091s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Express 10.978s (+3.2%) 11.024s (~) 0.046s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 18.327s (+4.0%) 20.541s (+4.4%) 2.214s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 14.501s (~) 15.022s (~) 0.521s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.541s (~) 15.021s (~) 0.480s 4 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 14.973s (~) 15.029s (~) 0.056s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Express 15.082s (+5.9% 🔺) 16.032s (+6.7% 🔺) 0.950s 4 1.04x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 36.313s (-5.2% 🟢) 38.305s (-4.8%) 1.991s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 13.820s (-2.1%) 14.021s (-4.9%) 0.201s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.060s (+0.8%) 14.879s (+4.0%) 0.820s 7 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 16.679s (~) 17.031s (~) 0.352s 6 1.21x
💻 Local Express 17.044s (+13.3% 🔺) 17.366s (+11.8% 🔺) 0.322s 6 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 63.861s (+7.1% 🔺) 66.568s (+7.8% 🔺) 2.708s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.252s (-1.9%) 2.009s (~) 0.757s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.259s (-1.8%) 2.009s (~) 0.750s 15 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 1.505s (-1.2%) 2.005s (~) 0.500s 15 1.20x
💻 Local Express 1.537s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.006s (~) 0.469s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.788s (+6.7% 🔺) 4.836s (+7.8% 🔺) 2.047s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.303s (-2.3%) 3.009s (~) 0.706s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.353s (~) 3.009s (~) 0.657s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 2.918s (-1.6%) 3.108s (-17.3% 🟢) 0.190s 10 1.27x
💻 Local Express 3.142s (+21.9% 🔺) 4.010s (+33.3% 🔺) 0.868s 8 1.36x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.725s (+6.4% 🔺) 4.550s (+9.2% 🔺) 1.825s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.462s (-0.9%) 4.011s (~) 0.549s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.470s (-0.5%) 4.012s (~) 0.541s 8 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 8.115s (-3.1%) 9.023s (~) 0.908s 4 2.34x
💻 Local Express 9.051s (+34.7% 🔺) 9.525s (+35.8% 🔺) 0.474s 4 2.61x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.307s (+2.7%) 5.475s (+8.3% 🔺) 2.168s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.257s (-0.8%) 2.008s (~) 0.751s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.285s (+1.5%) 2.008s (~) 0.723s 15 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 1.525s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.481s 15 1.21x
💻 Local Express 1.565s (+6.7% 🔺) 2.006s (~) 0.441s 15 1.24x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.190s (-1.8%) 4.053s (+0.8%) 1.864s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.328s (-1.4%) 3.009s (~) 0.681s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.335s (-1.2%) 3.010s (~) 0.675s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 3.050s (-1.5%) 3.884s (-3.1%) 0.834s 8 1.31x
💻 Local Express 3.191s (+7.3% 🔺) 4.010s (+20.0% 🔺) 0.819s 8 1.37x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.718s (-5.8% 🟢) 4.919s (+5.1% 🔺) 2.201s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.445s (-1.8%) 4.011s (~) 0.566s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.479s (-0.5%) 4.011s (~) 0.532s 8 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 8.753s (-6.3% 🟢) 9.021s (-10.0% 🟢) 0.268s 4 2.54x
💻 Local Express 9.659s (+20.1% 🔺) 10.026s (+14.3% 🔺) 0.367s 3 2.80x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.454s (+2.8%) 5.339s (-1.7%) 1.886s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.789s (-5.8% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.217s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.817s (-2.0%) 1.006s (~) 0.189s 60 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 0.984s (-0.6%) 1.113s (-11.3% 🟢) 0.130s 55 1.25x
💻 Local Express 1.034s (+47.6% 🔺) 2.006s (+99.8% 🔺) 0.973s 30 1.31x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 9.700s (-10.4% 🟢) 11.595s (-8.5% 🟢) 1.895s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.880s (-3.0%) 2.053s (-8.8% 🟢) 0.173s 44 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.929s (-1.8%) 2.150s (-3.5%) 0.221s 42 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 3.019s (~) 3.649s (+1.8%) 0.630s 25 1.61x
💻 Local Express 3.308s (+35.5% 🔺) 4.054s (+27.5% 🔺) 0.746s 23 1.76x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 28.609s (-3.1%) 30.811s (-2.4%) 2.202s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.825s (-1.7%) 4.009s (-3.3%) 0.184s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.919s (-2.6%) 4.148s (-6.9% 🟢) 0.229s 29 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 9.188s (-0.6%) 9.865s (-1.5%) 0.677s 13 2.40x
💻 Local Express 9.459s (+29.5% 🔺) 10.020s (+26.0% 🔺) 0.561s 12 2.47x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 84.737s (+10.5% 🔺) 87.069s (+9.7% 🔺) 2.332s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.281s (~) 1.007s (~) 0.725s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.283s (+2.9%) 1.007s (~) 0.723s 60 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 0.590s (+1.6%) 1.004s (~) 0.414s 60 2.10x
💻 Local Express 0.619s (+6.2% 🔺) 1.022s (+1.7%) 0.403s 59 2.20x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.772s (+9.7% 🔺) 3.600s (+4.0%) 1.828s 17 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.485s (-3.6%) 1.006s (~) 0.521s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.485s (-2.9%) 1.006s (~) 0.521s 90 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 2.512s (+1.5%) 3.009s (~) 0.497s 30 5.18x
💻 Local Express 2.618s (+9.3% 🔺) 3.009s (~) 0.391s 30 5.40x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.138s (-0.6%) 5.097s (+4.4%) 1.959s 18 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.767s (-2.9%) 1.007s (~) 0.240s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.777s (-0.8%) 1.015s (+0.8%) 0.239s 119 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 11.183s (+0.7%) 11.845s (~) 0.662s 11 14.58x
💻 Local Express 11.401s (+13.9% 🔺) 12.029s (+12.5% 🔺) 0.628s 10 14.86x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 7.192s (+23.2% 🔺) 9.046s (+16.1% 🔺) 1.854s 14 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.198s (-7.2% 🟢) 0.996s (~) 0.001s (-7.7% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.812s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.203s (~) 1.004s (~) 0.012s (+0.8%) 1.018s (~) 0.815s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Express 0.207s (+48.1% 🔺) 1.004s (~) 0.012s (+30.9% 🔺) 1.019s (~) 0.812s 10 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.215s (+4.3%) 0.996s (~) 0.001s (~) 1.010s (~) 0.794s 10 1.09x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.646s (-9.5% 🟢) 3.157s (-7.2% 🟢) 0.621s (+134.2% 🔺) 4.293s (+2.0%) 2.647s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.594s (-3.3%) 1.004s (~) 0.004s (+3.2%) 1.021s (~) 0.428s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.615s (+1.2%) 1.004s (~) 0.005s (-5.9% 🟢) 1.023s (~) 0.407s 59 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 0.726s (~) 1.012s (~) 0.010s (-0.5%) 1.023s (~) 0.297s 59 1.22x
💻 Local Express 0.752s (+34.8% 🔺) 1.013s (~) 0.010s (+15.3% 🔺) 1.024s (~) 0.272s 59 1.27x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 4.277s (-6.2% 🟢) 5.922s (-8.3% 🟢) 0.770s (+160.4% 🔺) 7.180s (-3.3%) 2.903s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.939s (-0.7%) 1.102s (-5.8% 🟢) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 1.116s (-5.7% 🟢) 0.177s 55 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.945s (-3.6%) 1.101s (-7.7% 🟢) 0.000s (-53.6% 🟢) 1.116s (-8.3% 🟢) 0.172s 55 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.312s (+15.1% 🔺) 2.021s (~) 0.000s (+75.0% 🔺) 2.023s (~) 0.711s 30 1.40x
💻 Local Nitro 1.418s (+14.5% 🔺) 2.022s (~) 0.000s (+20.5% 🔺) 2.203s (+8.9% 🔺) 0.785s 28 1.51x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 23.100s (+676.2% 🔺) 24.454s (+424.7% 🔺) 0.002s (~) 25.031s (+381.9% 🔺) 1.932s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.720s (-2.4%) 2.098s (~) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 2.113s (~) 0.393s 29 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.734s (-2.5%) 2.068s (-3.2%) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 2.101s (-2.1%) 0.367s 29 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 3.460s (-1.2%) 4.032s (-1.7%) 0.000s (-71.4% 🟢) 4.035s (-1.7%) 0.575s 15 2.01x
💻 Local Express 3.698s (+12.9% 🔺) 4.102s (+5.0%) 0.000s (-32.1% 🟢) 4.104s (+5.0%) 0.407s 15 2.15x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 4.471s (+6.0% 🔺) 6.474s (+13.4% 🔺) 0.000s (-93.5% 🟢) 6.923s (+11.3% 🔺) 2.452s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Nitro 19/21
🐘 Postgres Nitro 13/21
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 18/21
Next.js (Turbopack) ▲ Vercel 21/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@karthikscale3 karthikscale3 merged commit 3f4870c into main Apr 13, 2026
71 of 87 checks passed
@karthikscale3 karthikscale3 deleted the karthik/update-tweets branch April 13, 2026 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants