Skip to content

Add missing changeset for #1872 (trace viewer polish)#1883

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit intomainfrom
add-trace-viewer-polish-changeset
Apr 30, 2026
Merged

Add missing changeset for #1872 (trace viewer polish)#1883
TooTallNate merged 1 commit intomainfrom
add-trace-viewer-polish-changeset

Conversation

@TooTallNate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@TooTallNate TooTallNate commented Apr 30, 2026

Summary

  • The PR [trace viewer] Polish items #1872 ([trace viewer] Polish items) was merged to main in commit aeb495b without a changeset.
  • This adds a patch changeset for @workflow/web-shared and @workflow/web to cover those changes.

Force-pushing the changeset onto the original commit was attempted but blocked by branch protection rules on main, so this follow-up PR is the alternative.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 30, 2026 21:17
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6d30929

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 17 packages
Name Type
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/web Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/ai Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 30, 2026 9:21pm

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •
edited
Loading

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.041s (-8.1% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.964s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.041s (-4.2%) 1.005s (~) 0.963s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.048s 1.005s 0.958s 10 1.17x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.049s (-48.1% 🟢) 1.011s (-3.1%) 0.962s 10 1.21x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.059s (+1.7%) 1.010s (~) 0.951s 10 1.45x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.060s 1.009s 0.950s 10 1.47x
workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.117s (-2.0%) 2.010s (~) 0.893s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.118s 2.006s 0.888s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.125s (-0.5%) 2.006s (~) 0.881s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.129s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.877s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.138s 2.011s 0.873s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.151s (~) 2.009s (~) 0.858s 10 1.03x
workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 10.690s (-1.7%) 11.023s (~) 0.333s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.813s 11.023s 0.209s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.867s (-0.9%) 11.019s (~) 0.152s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 10.889s 11.022s 0.132s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 10.923s (~) 11.024s (~) 0.100s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Express 10.945s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.078s 3 1.02x
workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 14.038s (-3.8%) 15.026s (~) 0.988s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 14.449s 15.021s 0.572s 4 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.476s (-0.7%) 15.024s (~) 0.548s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 14.617s 15.029s 0.412s 4 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 14.953s (-0.7%) 15.030s (-6.2% 🟢) 0.077s 4 1.07x
💻 Local Express 15.014s (~) 15.278s (+1.7%) 0.264s 4 1.07x
workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 12.961s (-7.2% 🟢) 13.166s (-8.0% 🟢) 0.205s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 13.780s 14.020s 0.240s 7 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Express 13.970s (~) 14.310s (-1.9%) 0.341s 7 1.08x
💻 Local Nitro 16.408s (-2.2%) 17.029s (~) 0.621s 6 1.27x
💻 Local Express 16.415s (-1.1%) 17.031s (~) 0.617s 6 1.27x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 16.480s 17.032s 0.552s 6 1.27x
Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.196s (-6.2% 🟢) 2.008s (~) 0.812s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.223s 2.009s 0.786s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.273s (+1.0%) 2.010s (~) 0.737s 15 1.06x
💻 Local Express 1.512s (+1.5%) 2.006s (~) 0.494s 15 1.26x
💻 Local Nitro 1.525s (-6.5% 🟢) 2.005s (-3.3%) 0.480s 15 1.27x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.586s 2.006s 0.420s 15 1.33x
Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.309s (-1.8%) 3.009s (~) 0.700s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.360s (~) 3.008s (~) 0.649s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.393s 3.009s 0.616s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.825s 3.341s 0.517s 9 1.22x
💻 Local Nitro 2.846s (-9.5% 🟢) 3.108s (-20.0% 🟢) 0.263s 10 1.23x
💻 Local Express 2.936s (-0.6%) 3.565s (+3.2%) 0.630s 9 1.27x
Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.382s (-2.8%) 4.010s (~) 0.628s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.467s (-0.6%) 4.012s (~) 0.545s 8 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.628s 4.010s 0.382s 8 1.07x
💻 Local Express 7.426s (-10.9% 🟢) 8.023s (-11.1% 🟢) 0.597s 4 2.20x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.644s 8.019s 0.375s 4 2.26x
💻 Local Nitro 8.071s (-3.3%) 8.771s (-2.8%) 0.699s 4 2.39x
Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.189s (-5.4% 🟢) 2.008s (~) 0.819s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.215s 2.009s 0.794s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.278s (+1.6%) 2.008s (~) 0.730s 15 1.07x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.519s 2.007s 0.488s 15 1.28x
💻 Local Nitro 1.523s (-18.4% 🟢) 2.006s (-14.3% 🟢) 0.484s 15 1.28x
💻 Local Express 1.531s (-19.1% 🟢) 2.005s (-15.2% 🟢) 0.474s 15 1.29x
Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.260s (-3.4%) 3.010s (~) 0.750s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.329s (-0.5%) 3.010s (~) 0.681s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.401s 3.008s 0.607s 10 1.06x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.854s 3.453s 0.599s 9 1.26x
💻 Local Express 2.889s (-7.8% 🟢) 3.308s (-12.1% 🟢) 0.420s 10 1.28x
💻 Local Nitro 2.971s (-3.1%) 3.565s (-8.3% 🟢) 0.594s 9 1.31x
Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.388s (-2.7%) 4.010s (~) 0.622s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.470s (-0.8%) 4.011s (~) 0.541s 8 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.645s 4.012s 0.367s 8 1.08x
💻 Local Express 8.273s (-6.0% 🟢) 8.773s (-5.4% 🟢) 0.500s 4 2.44x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8.296s 8.774s 0.477s 4 2.45x
💻 Local Nitro 8.604s (-5.9% 🟢) 9.031s (-9.9% 🟢) 0.427s 4 2.54x
workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.614s (-25.1% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.392s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.784s 1.023s 0.239s 59 1.28x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.809s (-3.5%) 1.023s (~) 0.213s 59 1.32x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.862s 1.005s 0.143s 60 1.40x
💻 Local Nitro 0.968s (-1.3%) 1.116s (+2.0%) 0.148s 54 1.57x
💻 Local Express 1.016s (+3.2%) 1.700s (+58.0% 🔺) 0.684s 36 1.65x
workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.495s (-22.4% 🟢) 2.030s (-3.4%) 0.535s 45 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.903s 2.098s 0.195s 44 1.27x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.906s (-3.6%) 2.075s (-8.1% 🟢) 0.169s 44 1.27x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.768s 3.042s 0.274s 30 1.85x
💻 Local Nitro 3.027s (~) 3.609s (-4.0%) 0.582s 25 2.02x
💻 Local Express 3.049s (+1.1%) 3.843s (+7.2% 🔺) 0.793s 24 2.04x
workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.989s (-27.1% 🟢) 3.252s (-29.4% 🟢) 0.263s 37 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.864s 4.043s 0.179s 30 1.29x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.929s (-1.5%) 4.217s (-3.5%) 0.288s 29 1.31x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8.920s 9.249s 0.329s 13 2.98x
💻 Local Express 8.996s (-2.3%) 9.480s (-5.4% 🟢) 0.484s 13 3.01x
💻 Local Nitro 9.455s (+1.7%) 10.019s (~) 0.564s 12 3.16x
workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.223s (-21.3% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.784s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.245s 1.007s 0.762s 60 1.10x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.282s (~) 1.006s (~) 0.725s 60 1.26x
💻 Local Express 0.587s (+4.8%) 1.004s (~) 0.417s 60 2.63x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.590s 1.004s 0.415s 60 2.65x
💻 Local Nitro 0.607s (~) 1.005s (-1.7%) 0.398s 60 2.72x
workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.374s (-24.7% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.632s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.484s 1.007s 0.523s 90 1.30x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.492s (-3.4%) 1.006s (~) 0.514s 90 1.32x
💻 Local Express 2.400s (-4.5%) 3.009s (~) 0.609s 30 6.43x
💻 Local Nitro 2.568s (+1.2%) 3.009s (~) 0.442s 30 6.87x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.668s 3.009s 0.341s 30 7.14x
workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.567s (-28.3% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.440s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.786s 1.007s 0.221s 120 1.39x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.790s (-3.5%) 1.008s (-1.0%) 0.218s 120 1.39x
💻 Local Express 10.249s (-8.4% 🟢) 10.936s (-8.4% 🟢) 0.687s 11 18.09x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.785s 11.391s 0.607s 11 19.03x
💻 Local Nitro 10.932s (-2.3%) 11.573s (-0.8%) 0.641s 11 19.29x
Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.153s (-25.2% 🟢) 1.000s (~) 0.001s (-13.3% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.856s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.175s 1.002s 0.012s 1.019s 0.843s 10 1.14x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.195s 1.002s 0.002s 1.013s 0.818s 10 1.27x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.201s (-2.0%) 0.997s (~) 0.001s (-18.8% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.809s 10 1.31x
💻 Local Nitro 0.206s (-3.5%) 1.004s (~) 0.011s (-8.0% 🟢) 1.018s (~) 0.811s 10 1.34x
💻 Local Express 0.208s (+4.7%) 1.004s (~) 0.010s (-14.9% 🟢) 1.016s (~) 0.808s 10 1.36x
stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.489s (-21.6% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.003s (-16.4% 🟢) 1.020s (~) 0.531s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.614s (-2.6%) 1.005s (~) 0.005s (+39.8% 🔺) 1.024s (~) 0.410s 59 1.25x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.618s 1.009s 0.004s 1.025s 0.407s 59 1.26x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.676s 1.011s 0.010s 1.024s 0.348s 59 1.38x
💻 Local Express 0.862s (+13.8% 🔺) 1.012s (-1.7%) 0.011s (+20.8% 🔺) 1.117s (+7.5% 🔺) 0.256s 54 1.76x
💻 Local Nitro 0.866s (+3.3%) 1.031s (+1.9%) 0.010s (+7.7% 🔺) 1.137s (+1.9%) 0.271s 53 1.77x
10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.897s (-7.4% 🟢) 1.052s (-15.7% 🟢) 0.000s (-57.9% 🟢) 1.060s (-15.7% 🟢) 0.163s 57 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.948s 1.251s 0.000s 1.258s 0.310s 48 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.970s (+0.9%) 1.220s (-4.5%) 0.000s (-52.1% 🟢) 1.251s (-4.2%) 0.281s 48 1.08x
💻 Local Express 1.223s (~) 2.020s (~) 0.001s (+60.0% 🔺) 2.022s (~) 0.799s 30 1.36x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.289s 2.021s 0.000s 2.024s 0.735s 30 1.44x
💻 Local Nitro 1.290s (+5.5% 🔺) 2.022s (~) 0.000s (+100.0% 🔺) 2.024s (~) 0.734s 30 1.44x
fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.707s (-4.7%) 2.143s (~) 0.000s (+300.0% 🔺) 2.152s (-1.0%) 0.445s 28 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.745s (-1.5%) 2.099s (-3.6%) 0.000s (NaN%) 2.112s (-4.0%) 0.367s 29 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.859s 2.182s 0.000s 2.189s 0.330s 28 1.09x
💻 Local Express 3.476s (~) 3.972s (-1.5%) 0.000s (-45.3% 🟢) 3.975s (-1.5%) 0.499s 16 2.04x
💻 Local Nitro 3.522s (+4.0%) 4.100s (+1.7%) 0.000s (-25.0% 🟢) 4.103s (+1.6%) 0.581s 15 2.06x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.809s 4.166s 0.001s 4.170s 0.362s 15 2.23x

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 11/21
🐘 Postgres Nitro 21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 19/21
Next.js (Turbopack) 🐘 Postgres 17/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 20/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •
edited
Loading

🧪 E2E Test Results

❌ Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 988 1 67 1056
✅ 💻 Local Development 1066 0 86 1152
❌ 📦 Local Production 1065 1 86 1152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 1066 0 86 1152
✅ 🪟 Windows 96 0 0 96
✅ 📋 Other 270 0 18 288
Total 4551 2 343 4896

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nuxt (1 failed):

📦 Local Production (1 failed)

nitro-stable (1 failed):

  • distributedAbortController - reconnect to existing controller | wrun_01KQG4QH61GYNTPHFSW5R5GEQM

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 89 0 7
✅ example 89 0 7
✅ express 89 0 7
✅ fastify 89 0 7
✅ hono 89 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 94 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 94 0 2
✅ nitro 89 0 7
❌ nuxt 88 1 7
✅ sveltekit 89 0 7
✅ vite 89 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 90 0 6
✅ express-stable 90 0 6
✅ fastify-stable 90 0 6
✅ hono-stable 90 0 6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 77 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 96 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 77 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 96 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 90 0 6
✅ nuxt-stable 90 0 6
✅ sveltekit-stable 90 0 6
✅ vite-stable 90 0 6
❌ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 90 0 6
✅ express-stable 90 0 6
✅ fastify-stable 90 0 6
✅ hono-stable 90 0 6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 77 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 96 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 77 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 96 0 0
❌ nitro-stable 89 1 6
✅ nuxt-stable 90 0 6
✅ sveltekit-stable 90 0 6
✅ vite-stable 90 0 6
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 90 0 6
✅ express-stable 90 0 6
✅ fastify-stable 90 0 6
✅ hono-stable 90 0 6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 77 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 96 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 77 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 96 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 90 0 6
✅ nuxt-stable 90 0 6
✅ sveltekit-stable 90 0 6
✅ vite-stable 90 0 6
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 96 0 0
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 90 0 6
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 90 0 6
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 90 0 6

📋 View full workflow run

❌ Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: failure
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

Copilot AI reviewed Apr 30, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds the missing Changesets entry for the already-merged trace viewer polish work from #1872, ensuring @workflow/web-shared and @workflow/web receive a patch bump in the next release.

Changes:

  • Add a patch changeset for @workflow/web-shared
  • Add a patch changeset for @workflow/web
  • Summarize the trace viewer polish items in the changeset body

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@TooTallNate TooTallNate merged commit 640a050 into main Apr 30, 2026
95 of 103 checks passed
@TooTallNate TooTallNate deleted the add-trace-viewer-polish-changeset branch April 30, 2026 21:22
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2026
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate