Skip to content

Conversation

@JWDT
Copy link
Contributor

@JWDT JWDT commented May 1, 2019

Really minor issue, I know.

Really minor issue, I know.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6695dc0 on JWDT:patch-1 into 569d3b8 on vimalloc:master.

4 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6695dc0 on JWDT:patch-1 into 569d3b8 on vimalloc:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6695dc0 on JWDT:patch-1 into 569d3b8 on vimalloc:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6695dc0 on JWDT:patch-1 into 569d3b8 on vimalloc:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6695dc0 on JWDT:patch-1 into 569d3b8 on vimalloc:master.

@vimalloc vimalloc merged commit f79c982 into vimalloc:master May 1, 2019
@vimalloc
Copy link
Owner

vimalloc commented May 1, 2019

Thanks!

@JWDT JWDT deleted the patch-1 branch May 1, 2019 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants