Skip to content

[Question] Reference Feature requests for not (yet) supported features #37

@lechnerc77

Description

@lechnerc77

I have a question: the current overview comparing features of OpenTofu and Terraform is very useful, but I think it would add some value to see if a missing feature is already requested in the corresponding repository, as this provides a bit more context.

To give an example: when it comes to resource identities or actions that are available in Terraform but not yet in OpenTofu, instead of haven the "-" we could add "Requested" linking to the corrsponding GH issue.
For sure if a feature is not requested or is delined, the "-" stays.

What is your opinion on that?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions