Conversation
I hope nobody used this since it got accidentally released to the public. However it's undocumented and prefixed by testLeak, if you depended on something like that 🤷.
There is no longer any difference between development and production code.
Collaborator
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 8.0.3 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was used to test the internals but generally it's better to test the public API and not poke inside like this. Stripping of the code also broke some time ago and the getters leaking internal state in tests got released in some builds. Now it's all gone.
I hope nobody used this since it got accidentally released to the public. However it's undocumented and prefixed by
testLeak, if you depend on something like that 🤷.closes visjs/vis-timeline#1899