fix: swap schema numbers for positive integers

[sanny-io]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Strengthened cache configuration validation to accept only positive integers for TTL and SWR, preventing fractional or invalid numeric inputs and ensuring consistent cache behavior.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The ttl and swr fields in cacheOptionsSchema were changed from z.number().min(1).optional() to z.int().positive().optional(), enforcing positive integer validation while keeping the fields optional.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Schema Validation Tightening packages/cache/src/schemas.ts	Replaced z.number().min(1).optional() with z.int().positive().optional() for ttl and swr, restricting values to positive integers and updating the public schema API.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: replacing number validation with positive integer validation in the cache schema.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/schema-numbers

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In `@packages/cache/src/schemas.ts`:
- Around line 4-5: The schema fields ttl and swr currently use
z.int().positive().min(1).optional(), which redundantly applies .min(1) after
.positive(); remove the .min(1) call so both fields read
z.int().positive().optional() (leave .optional() intact) to simplify the
validation in the ttl and swr definitions in the schema.