Domain-Driven Design (DDD) is a software development approach that emphasizes a deep understanding of the business domain and aligns the software's structure to reflect that understanding. Introduced by Eric Evans in his book Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software, DDD helps developers model complex systems by focusing on the core business logic rather than technical details or infrastructure concerns.
-
Domain:
- The domain refers to the problem space or the area of expertise around which the software is being developed. It includes the business rules, processes, and knowledge that need to be captured in the software. The domain represents what the business does, and the software's job is to solve problems within this domain.
-
Ubiquitous Language:
- DDD promotes the creation of a shared language, called ubiquitous language, that is understood by both developers and domain experts (e.g., business stakeholders). This common language helps ensure that the software design and business concepts remain aligned throughout the development process.
-
Bounded Context:
- A bounded context defines the boundaries within which a particular domain model applies. Within a bounded context, the domain model is consistent and unambiguous. Different parts of the system may have their own bounded contexts, allowing different interpretations of the same terms in different parts of the application.
- For example, the word "Order" might mean different things in the context of order processing versus order shipping.
-
Entities:
- Entities represent objects that have a unique identity and are tracked throughout the system. Their identity is what matters most, rather than their attributes. Examples include users, orders, and products.
-
Value Objects:
- Value objects are objects that have attributes but do not have unique identities. They are immutable and are defined by their values. Examples include monetary amounts, dates, and addresses.
-
Aggregates:
- An aggregate is a cluster of related objects (entities and value objects) that are treated as a single unit. Each aggregate has a root entity, known as the aggregate root, which is responsible for controlling access to the aggregate. Only the aggregate root can be referenced or modified from outside the aggregate.
-
Repositories:
- Repositories provide an abstraction for accessing and storing aggregates. They hide the details of data access and provide methods for retrieving, saving, or deleting aggregates. This allows the domain model to remain decoupled from the underlying database or storage mechanisms.
-
Services:
- Domain services encapsulate domain logic that doesn’t naturally belong within a specific entity or value object. They are often used for operations that involve multiple entities or aggregates. A domain service operates at the level of the business rules.
-
Factories:
- Factories are responsible for creating complex objects, such as aggregates. They ensure that the creation process adheres to domain rules and constraints.
-
Factories:
- Domain events are used to model significant occurrences within the domain that other parts of the system might want to react to. They capture things that have happened in the past (e.g., "OrderPlaced" or "PaymentReceived").
-
Focus on the Core Domain:
- DDD emphasizes identifying the core domain, the part of the domain that is most critical to the business's success. Developers should spend most of their effort refining and improving this core domain while treating other parts of the system as less central.
-
Iterative Modeling:
- Domain models evolve as the understanding of the business evolves. DDD encourages collaboration between developers and domain experts to refine the model continuously through feedback and iteration.
-
Separation of Concerns:
- By using patterns like bounded contexts, entities, value objects, and aggregates, DDD helps in separating different parts of the application based on their responsibilities, thus making the system easier to maintain and evolve.
-
Strategic Design:
- DDD divides design into strategic and tactical components. Strategic design focuses on the high-level architecture, including bounded contexts and how they interact. Tactical design focuses on the detailed modeling within each bounded context using patterns like entities, value objects, and repositories.
Imagine you're building an e-commerce system. The domain is online retail, and the core domain might be order processing.
-
Entities:
Customer,Order,Product.- An
Orderhas a unique identity, and you can track it through its lifecycle.
- An
-
Value Objects:
Address,Money.Addressdoesn’t need an identity. You can replace one address with another, and it doesn’t matter if the actual object changes, as long as the values are correct.
-
Aggregates:
- An
Ordercould be an aggregate, and itsOrderLineitems could be value objects within that aggregate. TheOrderentity serves as the aggregate root.
- An
-
Bounded Contexts:
- You might have a "Shopping" bounded context for handling the customer’s shopping cart and checkout process, and an "Order Management" bounded context for handling the lifecycle of orders.
-
Services:
- A
PaymentServicemight handle payment processing, which involves different parts of the domain likeOrderandPayment.
- A
-
Repositories:
- The
OrderRepositorywould handle saving and retrieving orders from the database, ensuring the aggregate is correctly managed.
- The
-
Alignment with Business: DDD ensures that software closely matches the business’s needs and objectives by involving domain experts in the modeling process.
-
Modularity and Scalability: With concepts like bounded contexts and aggregates, DDD promotes modular designs that scale well and are easier to maintain and refactor.
-
Code Readability: By creating a shared ubiquitous language and organizing code around the domain, the resulting codebase is easier to understand for both developers and domain experts.
-
Encapsulation of Complexity: DDD allows you to handle complex business logic within domain models, ensuring that rules are applied consistently and that different parts of the system are isolated from unnecessary complexity.
Domain-Driven Design (DDD) provides a framework for tackling the complexities of building large, business-critical software by focusing on a deep understanding of the business domain and aligning the software architecture with that understanding. Through its principles, patterns, and practices, DDD helps teams develop software that is flexible, scalable, and maintainable, while staying true to the core business objectives.