Skip to content

Conversation

@k4leg
Copy link
Contributor

@k4leg k4leg commented Sep 26, 2019

As we know in Void Linux, there are two packages: gnupg & gnupg2. So, although the first time you launch kgpg, it gives you the opportunity to indicate where it is (gpg), but does not apply your actions, although it also indicates by default the correct path to gpg2.
Why not just add gnupg to the dependency, as it refers to /usr/bin/gpg? Because for some reason he does not want to work with him, he wants gnupg2.

@Hoshpak
Copy link
Member

Hoshpak commented Sep 26, 2019

I don't quite understand what the issue here is. I just launched kgpg and specifically selected gpg which is version 1.4.23 on my system. kgpg detected the version correctly, launched and worked fine.

@k4leg
Copy link
Contributor Author

k4leg commented Sep 26, 2019

Hmm, strange... I don’t have a choice of algorithms when trying to create keys, and if I try to create them, it will either give an error or create the illusion that it is being created, but actually does nothing.
In addition, if I’m not mistaken, as you said, it sets gpgme as a transistor dependence, and gpgme, in turn, depends on gnupg2, so, as for me, it’s better not to add this dependence (gnupg), but fix it in compilation time. As I said, for example, for some reason, he does not apply the actions that I told him during the first run (use /usr/bin/gpg2, and not /usr/bin/gpg) (maybe this is due to that by default it shows the correct path to gpg2 and believes that it has already set the place gpg -> gpg2).

@Hoshpak
Copy link
Member

Hoshpak commented Sep 30, 2019

I can reproduce the missing algorithms while generating the key. This is a bug that should be reported upstream. Usually if a package can work with several other packages, we let the user decide and don't create a hard dependency.

@k4leg
Copy link
Contributor Author

k4leg commented Oct 2, 2019

@Hoshpak Thank you, I didn’t even think about it. I reported a bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412511

@k4leg k4leg closed this Nov 27, 2019
@k4leg k4leg deleted the patch-4 branch November 27, 2019 15:32
@k4leg k4leg restored the patch-4 branch November 27, 2019 15:38
@k4leg k4leg deleted the patch-4 branch November 27, 2019 15:38
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 25, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants