New package: ananicy-cpp-1.2.0

[lretq]

Testing the changes

• I tested the changes in this PR: YES

New package

• This new package conforms to the package requirements: YES

Local build testing

• I built this PR locally for my native architecture, x86_64-glibc

With the cross-build fixes also for: x86_64-musl, aarch64-glibc, aarch64-musl

[lretq]

I will have to look into the musl build

[ahesford]

I'm not sure that the service should be tweaking sysctls. Let people configure their systems to support the daemon if they want to run it. In any case, there is no good reason for using two different approaches to setting sysctls in the run and finish scripts.

[lretq]

I'm not sure that the service should be tweaking sysctls. Let people configure their systems to support the daemon if they want to run it. In any case, there is no good reason for using two different approaches to setting sysctls in the run and finish scripts.

I took that part out. Should I provide some sort of sysctl.d/ananicy.conf example file?

[ahesford]

No, users can be expected to read the upstream documentation regarding sysctls. If it isn't documented upstream, maybe add a note in README.voidlinux.

[lretq]

No, users can be expected to read the upstream documentation regarding sysctls. If it isn't documented upstream, maybe add a note in README.voidlinux.

As I understand it, ananicy-cpp supports autogroups anyway; no need for the sysctls. As for ananicy itself, I've been using it for the past couple weeks now without issues.