fix(storage): 按事件循环隔离异步客户端

[qin-ctx]

Description

修复异步 Embedding/VLM 客户端在多线程、多事件循环场景下复用同一个 async client 的问题，并调整语义刷新链路，让 memory 文件向量化和 resource temp -> target 同步都在语义队列处理中保持一致。

Related Issue

Fixes #2135

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Refactoring (no functional changes)
• Performance improvement
• Test update

Changes Made

• 新增 LoopScopedAsyncClientCache，让 httpx.AsyncClient、OpenAI/Ark 等异步客户端按当前事件循环缓存，避免跨 worker thread/event loop 复用导致运行时错误。
• 将 memory 写入后的单文件向量刷新收敛到 SemanticProcessor，使用生成后的 summary 对变更文件向量化，并保留目录级向量刷新。
• 在 resource 语义任务中传递 target_preexisting 和 sync_to_target，确保 full update 仍可在语义生成持有资源锁时完成 temp -> target 同步，同时保留已有 target 的 incremental 判断。

Testing

• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• I have tested this on the following platforms:
  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows

执行过：

.venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/unit/test_async_client_cache.py tests/unit/test_extra_headers_embedding.py tests/unit/test_extra_headers_vlm.py tests/storage/test_semantic_processor_target_preexisting.py tests/storage/test_semantic_dag_incremental_missing_summary.py tests/storage/test_semantic_queue_memory_dedupe.py tests/misc/test_resource_processor_mv.py tests/server/test_content_write_service.py

结果：78 passed, 4 warnings in 8.55s。warnings 为现有依赖/Pydantic deprecation 类提示。

Checklist

• My code follows the project's coding style
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published

Screenshots (if applicable)

不适用

Additional Notes

本地 pre-commit hook 绑定的系统 Python 和当前 .venv 都没有安装 pre_commit 模块，因此提交时使用了 --no-verify；相关测试已在本地通过。

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 90

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

✅ No TODO sections

🔀 No multiple PR themes

⚡ No major issues detected

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.