Skip to content

docs(retrieval): note intent-analysis model is configurable via query_planner (#2224)#2269

Merged
qin-ctx merged 2 commits into
volcengine:mainfrom
r266-tech:docs-retrieval-query-planner-2224
May 28, 2026
Merged

docs(retrieval): note intent-analysis model is configurable via query_planner (#2224)#2269
qin-ctx merged 2 commits into
volcengine:mainfrom
r266-tech:docs-retrieval-query-planner-2224

Conversation

@r266-tech
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The retrieval concept doc (docs/{en,zh}/concepts/07-retrieval.md) describes the Intent Analysis stage as "IntentAnalyzer uses LLM to analyze query intent", but #2224 (feat(search) Add lightweight query planner config for intent analysis) made the model for this exact stage separately configurable via the new query_planner config (rewiring intent_analyzer.py to call config.get_query_planner(), which falls back to vlm).

#2224 self-documented the knob in guides/01-configuration.md (### query_planner), but the concept doc that explains the intent-analysis mechanism still implies a single fixed LLM. Users reading this doc to understand/tune the stage won't discover they can point it at a cheaper dedicated model.

This adds a one-sentence note + cross-link to the configuration guide, in both EN and ZH (byte-structurally mirrored concept docs). Pure docs, no behavior change.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🏅 Score: 100
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

@qin-ctx qin-ctx merged commit bc3aebb into volcengine:main May 28, 2026
3 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Backlog to Done in OpenViking project May 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants